Factors affecting management uncertainty in U.S. fisheries and methodological solutions

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 71, Issue , 2013, Pages 64-72

  Patrick, Wesley S ^a   Morrison, Wendy ^a   Nelson, Mark ^a   González Marrero, Rosa L ^a  

^a NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERANNUAL; MANAGEMENT REGIME; MARINE FISHERY; REFERENCE POINTS; SCIENTIFIC UNCERTAINTY;

FISHERIES; MANAGERS;

MANAGEMENT;

ANNUAL VARIATION; CATCHABILITY; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84869882245     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Allan C., Curtis A. Nipped in the bud: why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming. Environmental Management 2005, 36(3):414-425.
2. Berkson J., Barbieri L., Cadrin S., Cass-Calay S., Crone P., Dorn M., Friess C., Kobayashi D., Miller T.J., Patrick W.S., Pautzke S., Ralston S., Trianni M. Calculating acceptable biological catch for stocks that have reliable catch data only (Only Reliable Catch Stocks - ORCS). NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC 2011, 616:56.
3. Caddy, J.F., Mahon, R., 1995. Reference points for fisheries management. FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations) Fisheries Technical Paper, 347.
4. Charles A.T. Living with uncertainty in fisheries: analytical methods, management priorities and the Canadian groundfishery experience. Fisheries Research 1998, 37:37-50.
5. Dichmont C.M., Deng A., Punt A.E., Veneables W., Haddon M. Management strategies for short-lived species: the case of Australia's northern prawn fishery 1. Accounting for multiple species, spatial structure and implementation uncertainty when evaluating risk. Fisheries Research 2006, 82:204-220.
6. Essington T.E. Ecological indicators display reduced variation in North American catch share fisheries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010, 107(2):754-759.
7. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). Precautionary Approach to Fisheries Part 2: scientific papers prepared for the technical consultation on the precautionary approach to capture fisheries (including species introductions) Lysekil, Sweden, 6-13 June 1995. FAO Fish Tech Paper 1996; 350 (Part 2). FAO, Rome, p. 210.
8. Francis R.I.C.C., Shotton R. "Risk" in fisheries management: a review. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1997, 54:1699-1715.
9. Fulton E.A., Smith A.D.M., Smith D.C., van Putten I.E. Human behavior: the key source of uncertainty in fisheries management. Fish and Fisheries 2011, 12:2-17.
10. Hilborn R., Maguire J., Parm A.M., Rosenberg A.A. The precautionary approach and risk management: can they increase the probability of successes in fishery management?. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2001, 58:99-107.
11. Holt C.A., Peterman R.M. Missing the target: uncertainties in achieving management goals in fisheries on Fraser River, British Columbia, sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2006, 63:2722-2733.
12. Melnychuk M.C., Essington T.E., Branch T.A., Heppel S.S., Jensen O.P., Link J.S., Martell S.J.D., Parma A.M., Pope J.G., Smith A.D.M. Can catch share fisheries better track management targets?. Fish and Fisheries 2012, early version available at:. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00429.x/pdf.
13. Parma A.M., Amaraseare P., Mange M., Moore J., Murdoch W., Noonburg E., Pascual M.A., Possingham H.P., Shea K., Wilcox C., Yu D. What can adaptive management do for our fish, forests, food and biodiversity?. Integrative Biology 1998, 1:16-26.
14. Prager M.H., Porch C.E., Shertzer K.W., Caddy J.F. Targets and limits for management of fisheries; a simple probability-based approach. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 2003, 23:349-361.
15. Restrepo V.R., Powers J.E. Precautionary control rules in US fisheries management: specification and performance. ICES Journal of Marine Science 1999, 56:846-852.
16. Rosenberg A.A., Brault S. Choosing a management strategy for stock rebuilding when control is uncertain. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1993, vol. 120:243-249. S.J. smith, J.J. Hunt, D. Rivard (Eds.).
17. Rosenberg A.A., Swasey J.H., Bowman M. Rebuilding US fisheries: progress and problems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2006, 4(6):303-308.
18. Ryans N. The Australian government's harvest strategy policy. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2007, 64(4):596-598.
19. Shertzer K.W., Prager M.H., Williams E.H. A probability-based approach to setting annual catch levels. Fishery Bulletin 2008, 106:225-232.
20. Shertzer K.W., Prager M.H., Williams E.H. Probabilistic approaches to setting acceptable biological catch and annual catch targets for multiple years: reconciling methodology with National Standards Guidelines. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science 2010, 2:451-458.
21. Walters C.J. Is adaptive management helping to solve fisheries problems?. Ambio 2007, 36(4):304-307.
22. Williams B.K. Approaches to the management of waterfowl under uncertainty. Wildlife Society Bulletin 1997, 25(3):714-720.