Effect of limited nickel availability on methane emission from EDTA treated soils: Coenzyme M an alternative biomarker for methanogens

Chemosphere

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 873-876

  Pramanik, P ^a   Kim, P J ^a  

^a Gyeongsang National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Coenzyme M; EDTA application; Methanogens; Ni availability

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKERS; CHELATION; COENZYMES; ETHYLENEDIAMINETETRAACETIC ACID; GENES; HEAVY METALS; METHANE; METHANOGENS; NICKEL COMPOUNDS; SOIL MOISTURE;

ANAEROBIC CONDITIONS; CARBON COMPOUNDS; COMPLEX COMPOUNDS; INTRACELLULAR PROCESS; METHANE EMISSIONS; METHYL COENZYMES; NICKEL CONTAINING; REDUCTASE ENZYMES;

SOIL POLLUTION;

EDETIC ACID; HEAVY METAL; MESNA; METHANE; NICKEL; OXIDOREDUCTASE;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOMARKER; CARBON EMISSION; EDTA; EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSION INVENTORY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION; METHANE; METHANOGENESIS; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; NICKEL; SOIL AMENDMENT;

ARTICLE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GENE DOSAGE; METHANOGEN; METHANOGENESIS; SOIL; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL TREATMENT;

EID: 84869878958     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: 18791298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Benitez L.N., Dubois J.P. Evaluation of ammonium oxalate for fractionating metallic trace elements in soils by sequential extractions. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 1999, 75:261-273.
2. Chen H., Cutright T. EDTA and HEDTA effects on Cd, Cr, and Ni uptake by Helianthus annuus. Chemosphere 2001, 45:21-28.
3. 430 in active methyl-coenzyme M reductase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125:4988-4989.
4. Gomez K.A., Gomez A.A. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research 1984, John Wiley and Sons, New York. second ed.
5. Hummel W., Mompean F.J., Illemassene M. Chemical Thermodynamics of Compounds and Complexes of U, Np, Pu, Am, Tc, Se, Ni and Zr with Selected Organic Ligands 2005, Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, The Netherland.
6. Kaster A.K., Moll J., Parey K., Thauer R.K. Coupling of ferredoxin and heterodisulfide reaction via electron bifurcation in hydrogenotrophic methanogensic archaea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108:2981-2986.
7. Luton P.E., Wayne J.M., Sharp R.J., Riley P.W. The mcrA gene as an alternative to 16S rRNA in the phylogenetic analysis of methanogen populations in landfill. Microbiology 2002, 148:3521-3530.
8. Pramanik P., Kim P.J. Quantitative determination of 2-mercaptoethane sulphonate as biomarker for methanogens in soil by high performance liquid chromatography using UV detector. Accepted Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.06.014.
9. Steinberg L.M., Regan J.M. McrA-targeted real-time quantitative PCR method to examine methanogen communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75:4435-4442.
10. Thauer R.K. Biochemistry of methanogenesis a tribute to maejory Stephenson. Microbiology 1998, 144:2377-2406.
11. Thauer R.K., Kaster A.K., Seedorf H., Buckel W., Hedderich R. Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation. Nat. Rev. 2008, 6:579-591.
12. Williams P.E.V., Innes G.M., Brewer A., Magadi J.P. The effects of growth, food intake and rumen volume of including untreated or ammonia-treated barley straw in a complete diet for weaning calves. Anim. Prod. 1985, 41:63-74.
13. Zhou Z., Meng Q., Yu Z. Effects of methanogenic inhibitors on methane production and abundance of methanogens and cellulolytic bacteria in in vitro rumen cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77:2634-2639.