The eastern association of the surgery of trauma approach to practice management guideline development using Grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology

Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

Volumn 73, Issue 5 SUPPL.4, 2012, Pages

  Kerwin, Andrew J ^a   Haut, Elliott R ^b   Burns, J Bracken ^a   Como, John J ^c   Haider, Adil ^b   Stassen, Nicole ^c,d   Dahm, Philipp ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c METROHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

evidence based medicine; GRADE; Guideline; surgery; trauma

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GRADING OF RECOMMENDATIONS ASSESSMENT DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRACTICE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLISHING; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TRAUMATOLOGY; UNITED STATES; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 84869858772     PISSN: 21630755     EISSN: 21630763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827013e9     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Guyatt GH, Akl EA, Crowther M, Gutterman DD, Schuunemann HJ. American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Panel. Executive summary: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(Suppl 2):7SY47S.
2. Rogers FB, Cipolle MD, Velmahos G, Rozycki G, Luchette FA. Practice management guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in trauma patients: the EAST practice management guidelines work group. J Trauma. 2006;53:142-164.
3. Straus S, Shepperd S. Challenges in guideline methodology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:347-348.
4. Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM, Greenfield S, Steinberg E (eds). Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines; Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
5. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924-926.
6. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Schunemann HJ. GRADE: what is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ. 2008;336:995-998.
7. Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et al. GRADE: grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ. 2008;336:1106-1110.
8. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE: incorporating considerations of resource use into grading recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:1170-1173.
9. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE: going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:1049-1051.
10. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P, et al. Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ. 2008;337:744.
11. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knottnerus A. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:380-382.
12. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:383-394.
13. Guyatt GH, D. OA, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important questions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64:395-400.
14. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:401-406.
15. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidenceVstudy limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:407-415.
16. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidenceVpublication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64: 1277-1282.
17. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guideline: 6. Rating the quality of evidenceVimprecision. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1283-1293.
18. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidenceVinconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64: 1294-1302.
19. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidenceVindirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1303-1310.
20. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, et al. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1311-1316.
21. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S, et al. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. Epub. 27 April 2012.
22. Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Ad Hoc Committee on Practice Management Guideline Development. Utilizing evidence based medicine outcome measures to develop practice management guidelines: a primer. EAST; 2000. Available at: www.east.org/content/documents/east-pmg-primer.pdf.
23. Eden J, Levit L, Berg A, Morton S. Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness; Institute of Medicine. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2012.