Unity and diversity in a collaborative research project

Culture and Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 227-252

  Akkerman, Sanne ^a   Admiraal, Wilfried ^b   Simons, Robert Jan ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

boundary crossing; collaboration; diversity; multiple voices; unity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869832508     PISSN: 1354067X     EISSN: 14617056     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X11434835     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Akkerman S,Admiraal W,Simons R J,Niessen T.Considering diversity: Multivoicedness in international academic collaboration.Culture & Psychology. 2006;12 (4): 461-485.
2. Akkerman S,Admiraal W,Brekelmans M,Oost H.Auditing quality of research in social sciences.Quality & Quantity. 2008;42:257-274.
3. Akkerman S. F.,Bakker A.Boundary crossing and boundary objects.Review of Educational Research. 2011;81 (2): 132-169.
4. Akkerman S,Niessen TDialogicality in focus. Challenges to Theory, Method and Application. Märtsin MWagoner BAveling E LKadianaki IWhittaker L, ed. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers; 2011:53-64.
5. Argyris COn organizational learning. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers; 1993:.
6. Bakhtin MThe dialogical imagination. (C. Emerson, M. Holquist Trans.). Holquist M, ed.Austin, TX: University of Texas Press; 1981:259-422.
7. Bakhtin MProblems of Dostoevsky's poetics. (C. Emerson. Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Michigan Press; 1984:.
8. Bakhtin MSpeech genres & other late essays (V. McGee Trans.). Emerson CHolquist M, ed. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press; 1986:60-131.
9. Creswell J WQualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998:.
10. Engeström Y,Engeström R,Kärkkäinen M.Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities.Learning and Instruction. 1995;5:319-336.
11. Geertz CThe interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1973:.
12. Guba E G.Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalisic inquiries.Educational Communication and Technology Journal. 1981;29 (2): 75-91.
13. Guba E G,Lincoln Y SFourth generation evaluation. London: Sage; 1989:.
14. Gurevitch Z D.The other side of dialogue: On making the other strange and the experience of otherness.American Journal of Sociology. 1988;93:1179-1199.
15. Gutiérrez K D,Baquedano-López P,Tejeda C.Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space.Mind, Culture and Activity. 1999;6:286-303.
16. Halpern E SAuditing naturalistic inquiries: The development and application of a model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University; 1983:.
17. Hammersley M,Atkinson PEthnography: Principles in practice. London, UK: Routledge; 1995:.
18. Hermans H J M.The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning.Culture & Psychology. 2001;7 (3): 243-281.
19. Hermans H J M,Kempen H J GThe dialogical self: Meaning as movement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1993:.
20. Kerosuo HManaging clinical processes in the health services. Sorensen RIedema R, ed. Sydney, Australia: Elsevier; 2008:73-85.
21. Knorr Cetina K DEpistemic cultures. how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1999:.
22. Konkola R,Tuomi-Gröhn T,Lambert P,Ludvigsen S.Promoting learning and transfer between school and workplace.Journal of Education and Work. 2007;20 (3): 211-228.
23. Latour B,Woolgar SLaboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage; 1979:.
24. Lave J,Wenger ESituated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991:.
25. Macpherson A,Jones O.Object-mediated learning and strategic renewal in a mature organization.Management Learning. 2008;39 (2): 177-201.
26. Marks M A,Burke C S,Sabella M J,Zaccaro S J.The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002;87 (1): 3-13.
27. Mathieu J E,Heffner T S,Goodwin G F,Salas E,Cannon-Bowers J A.The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2000;85 (2): 273-283.
28. Matusov E.Intersubjectivity without agreement.Mind, Culture and Activity. 1996;3 (1): 25-45.
29. Mohammed S,Ringseis E.Cognitive diversity and consensus in group decision making: The role of inputs, processes and outcomes.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2001;85 (2): 310-335.
30. Paterson G IBoundary infostructures for chronic disease. Halifax, CA: Dalhousie University; 2007:.
31. Roth G,Kleiner ACar launch: The human side of managing change. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1999:.
32. Spradley J PParticipant observation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1980:.
33. Star S LDistributed artificial intelligence. Gasser LHuhns M, ed. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc; 1989:37-54.
34. Star S L,Griesemer J R.Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-1939.Social Studies of Science. 1989;19 (3): 387-420.
35. Valsiner J.Scaffolding within the structure of dialogic self: Hierarchical dynamics of semiotic mediation.New ideas in Psychology. 2005;23:197-206.
36. Weber SIntercultural experience and education. Alred GByram MFleming M, ed. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters; 2001:196-212.
37. Wertsch J VVoices of the mind. A sociocultural approach to mediated action. London, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1991:.
38. Wolcott H FTransforming qualitative data: Description, analysis and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994:.
39. Zomer P.Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 2002:.