Bridging the assimilation gap: A user-centered approach to it adoption in corporate HR processes

Association for Information Systems - 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2005: A Conference on a Human Scale

Volumn 3, Issue , 2005, Pages 1200-1208

  Keim, Tobias ^a   Malinowski, Jochen ^b   Weitzel, Tim ^b  

^a Univentures GmbH   (Germany)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

(E )Recruitment; Applicant management systems; Candidate attraction; Human resources; It adoption; It diffusion

Indexed keywords

(E-)RECRUITMENT; CANDIDATE ATTRACTION; IT ADOPTION; IT DIFFUSION; MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL;

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84869815353     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R. and Todd, P. A. (1992) Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16, pp. 227-247.
2. Argawal, R., Tanniru, M. and Wilemon, D. (1997) Assimilating Information Technology Innovations: Strategies and Moderating Influences, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 347-358.
3. Armstrong, M. (1995) A handbook of personnel management practice, 5th Edition, London, UK, Kogan Page.
4. Attewell, P. (1992) Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing, Organization Science, Volume 3, pp. 1-19.
5. Beck, C. (2002) Professionelles E-Recruiting: Strategien-Instrumente-Beispiele, Neuwied, Kriftel, Luchterhand.
6. Davis, F. D. (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, September, pp. 318-340.
7. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. (1989) User acceptance of information technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35, 8.
8. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) Building Theory from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review, 14, 4, 532-550.
9. Färber, F., Keim, T., König, W., von Westarp, F., Weitzel, T. and Wendt, O. (2003a), Recruiting Trends 2003: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Top-1.000-Unternehmen in Deutschland, Working paper, Frankfurt am Main.
10. Färber, F., Keim, T. and Weitzel, T. (2003b) An Automated Recommendation Approach to Personnel Selection, Proceedings of the 2003 Americas Conference on Information Systems, Tampa, Florida, USA.
11. Fichman, R. G. (1992) Information Technology Diffusion: A Review of Empirical Research, Proceedings International Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, USA, pp. 195-206.
12. Fichman, R.G. and Kernerer, C.F. (1999) The Illusory Diffusion of Innovations: An Analysis of Assimilation Gaps, Information Systems Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 255-275.
13. Gallivan, M. J. (2001), Organizational Adoption and Assimilation of Complex Technological Innovations: Development and Application of a New Framework, The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 51-85
14. Gordon, S. R. and Gordon, J. R. (1993) Factors that Affect the Adoption of Distributed Database Management Systems, Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGCPR Conference, April, St. Louis, USA, pp. 151-167.
15. Hoffer, J. A. and Alexander, M. B. (1992) The diffusion of database machines, Data Base, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 13-19.
16. Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C. (1986) Technology Adoption In the Presence of Network Externalities, Journal of Political Economy, Volume 94, 1986, pp. 822-841.
17. Keim, T., König, W., von Westarp, F., Weitzel, T. and Wendt, O. (2005) Recruiting Trends 2005 - Eine empirische Untersuchung der Top-1.000-Unternehmen in Deutschland und von 1.000 Unternehmen aus dem Mittelstand, Working paper, Frankfurt am Main.
18. Konradt, U. and Sarges, W. (2003) E-Recruitment und E-Assessment, Hogrefe-Verlag GmbH, Germany.
19. Kwon, T. H. and Zmud, R. W. (1987) Unifying the Fragmented Models of Information Systems Implementation, in J. R. Boland, and R. Hirshheim (eds.), Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, New York, John Wiley, 1987, pp. 227-251.
20. Lee, A. S. (1989) A scientific methodology for MIS Case Studies, MIS Quarterly, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp. 33-50.
21. Lee, S.-H. (1999) Taxonomy of HRM Policies of Knowledge-based Firms: a Resources-based Explanation, International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 379-395.
22. Legris, P., Ingham, J. and Collerette, P. (2003) Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model, Information & Management, 40, pp. 191-204.
23. Leonard-Barton, D. and Deschamps, I. (1988) Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology, Management Science, Volume 34, pp. 1252-1265.
24. Mathieson, K., Peacock, E. and Chin, W. W. (2001) Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence of Perceived User Resources, The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 32, No.3, pp. 86-112.
25. Olfert, K. (2003) Personalwirtschaft, 10th Edition, Friedrich Kiel Verlag GmbH, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
26. Prescott, M.B. and Conger, S.A. (1995) Information Technology Innovations: A Classification by IT Locus of Impact and Research. The Data Base, May/August, 26(2-3).
27. Rogers, E. M. (1983) Diffusion of Innovations, New York, USA, The Free Press, 3rd Edition.
28. Schneider, B. (1995), Personalbeschaffung, Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften.
29. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A. (1995) Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models, Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, pp. 144-176.
30. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000) A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186-204.
31. Yin, R. K. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi.