Adoption of biometric technology: Information privacy and TAM

Association for Information Systems - 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2005: A Conference on a Human Scale

Volumn 3, Issue , 2005, Pages 1188-1191

  Elgarah, Wafa ^a   Falaleeva, Natalia ^b  

^a Al Akhawayn University   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Biometrics; Concern for information privacy; TAM

Indexed keywords

BIOMETRIC TECHNOLOGY; INDIVIDUAL-BASED; INFORMATION PRIVACY; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; SCANNING EQUIPMENTS; TAM; WORK IN PROGRESS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY;

BIOMETRICS;

EID: 84869797773     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Agarwal, R. & Prasad, J. (1997) The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies, Decision Science, 28, 3, 557-582.
2. Albrecht, A. (2003) Privacy Best Practices, Biometric Technology Today, 11, 11, 8-9.
3. Bolle, R.M., Connell, J.H., Pankanti, S., Ratha, N., and Senior, A.W. (2004) Guide to Biometrics, New York.
4. Davis, F. D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, 13, 3, 319-340.
5. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. (1989) User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science, 35, 8, 982-1003.
6. Fulcher, J. (2004) The Use of Patient Biometrics in Accessing Electronic Health Records, International Journal of HealthCare Technology and Management, 6, 1, 20-31.
7. Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., and Peralta, M. (1999) Information privacy in the marketspace: Implications for the commercial uses of anonymity on the web, Information Society, 15, 4, 129-139.
8. Gefen, D., and Straub, D. W. (2000) The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease-of-Use in IS Adoption: A Study of Ecommerce Adoption, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1, 8, 1-30.
9. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D. W. (2003) Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model, MIS Quarterly, 27, 1, 51-90.
10. Mathieson, K. (1991) Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior, Information Systems Research, 2, 3, 173-191.
11. Mason, R. O. (1986) Four ethical issues of the information age, MIS Quarterly, 10, 1, 4-12.
12. Moore, G C. and Benbasat, I. (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation, Information Systems Research, 2, 192-222.
13. Reid, P. (2004) Biometrics for Network Security, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
14. Smith, H.J., Milberg, S.J., and Burke, S.J. (1996) Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals' Concerns About Organizational Practicies, MIS Quarterly, 20, 2, 167-196.
15. Stone, E.F., and Stone, D.L. (1990) Privacy in Organizations: Theoretical Issues, Research Findings, and Protection Mechanisms, in: Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, G.R. Ferris and K.M. Rowland (eds.), JAI Press Inc, Greenwich, CT, 349-411.
16. Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A. (1995) Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models, Information Systems Research, 6, 2, 144-176.
17. Tomko, G. (1998) Biometrics as a Privacy-Enhancing Technology: Friend or For of Privacy, Privacy Laws & Business 9th Privacy Commissioners'/Data Protection Authorities Workshop, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
18. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. (2000) A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, 46, 2, 186-204