Evaluation of five screening methods for an early detection of cervical cancer and its precancerous lesions in Zhejiang province

National Medical Journal of China

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 309-312

  Fei, Hua Li ^a   Cheng, Yi Fan ^a   Cheng, Xiao Dong ^a   Chen, Xiao Duan ^a   Ye, Feng ^a   Lü, Wei Guo ^a   Xie, Xing ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Cervical cancer; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Cytology; HPV DNA testing; Visual inspection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRECANCER; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; WART VIRUS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; HISTOLOGY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; STAINING; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR; VIROLOGY;

VIRUS DNA;

ADULT; AGED; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; DNA, VIRAL; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HISTOCYTOLOGICAL PREPARATION TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPHASIC SCREENING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STAINING AND LABELING; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 84869788296     PISSN: 03762491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2011.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cronjé HS, Parham GP, Cooreman BF, et al. A comparison of four screening methods for cervical neoplasia in a developing country. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 188:395-400.
2. Wu S, Meng L, Wang S, et al. A comparison of four screening methods for cervical neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2005, 91: 189-193.
3. Almonte M, Ferreccio C, Winkler JL, et al. Cervical screening by visual inspection, HPV testing, liquid-based and conventional cytology in Amazonian Peru. Int J Cancer, 2007, 121: 796-802.
4. Sankaranarayanan R, Wesley R, Thara S, et al. Test characteristics of visual inspection with 4% acetic acid (VIA) and Lugol's iodine (VILI) in cervical cancer screening in Kerala, India. Int J Cancer, 2003, 106: 404-408.
5. Wright TC. Cervical cancer screening in the 21st century: is it time to retire the PAP smear? Clin Obst Gynecol, 2007, 50: 313-323.
6. Sabuhi Qureshi, Vinta Das, Fatima Zahra. Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid and Lugol's iodine as cervical cancer screening tools in a low-resource setting. Tropical Doctor, 2010, 40: 9-12.
7. Brn Strander, Agneta Andersson-Ellstro, Ian Milsom, et al. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in an organized screening program. Cancer, 2007, 111: 285-291.
8. Davey E, Barratt A, Irwig L, et al. Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review. Lancet, 2006, 367: 122-132.
9. Arbyn M, Bergeron C, Klinkhamer, et al. Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 111: 167-177.
10. Sankaranarayanan R, Esmy PO, Rajkumar R, et al. Effect of visual screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Tamil Nadu, India: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet, 2007, 370: 398-406.
11. Marc Arbyn. Sankaranarayanan R. Pooled analysis of the accuracy of five cervical cancer screening tests assessed in eleven studies in Africa and India. Int J Cancer, 2008, 123: 153-160.
12. Li N, Ma CP, Sun LX, et al. Evaluation on the visual inspection with Lugol's iodine in cervical cancer screening program. Chin J Epidemio, 2006, 27: 15-18.
13. Qiao YL, Zhang WH, Li L, et al. The cross sectional comparative study of cervical cancer screening methods. Acta Acad Med Sin, 2002, 24; 50-53.
14. Arbyn M, Sasieni P, Meijer CJLM, et al. Chapter 9: clinical applications of HPV testing: a summary of meta-analyses. Vaccine, 2006, 24; 78-89.
15. Goldie SJ, Kim JJ, Wright TC. Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in women aged 30 years or more. Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 103: 617-618.