Longevity of posterior dental restorations and reasons for failure

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 120, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 539-548

  Kopperud, Simen E ^a   Tveit, Anne Bjørg ^a   Gaarden, Torunn ^b   Sandvik, Leiv ^a   Espelid, Ivar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b Hordaland County Council   (Norway)

Author keywords

Composite resins; Dental amalgam; Dental caries; Dental restoration

Indexed keywords

DENTAL MATERIAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 84869754777     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: 16000722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/eos.12004     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Mjör IA. Amalgam and composite resin restorations: longevity and reasons for replacement. In: Anusavice K, ed. Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Chicago: Quintessence, 1989; 61-80.
2. Qvist J, Qvist V, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 297-303.
3. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 305-311.
4. Forss H. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults. Acta Odontol Scand 2004; 62: 82-86.
5. Ericson D. The concept of minimally invasive dentistry. Dental update 2007; 34: 9-10, 12-14, 17-18.
6. Elderton RJ. The quality of amalgam restorations. In: Allred H, ed. Assessment of the quality of dental care. London: London Hospital Medical Collage, 1977; 45-81.
7. Brantley CF, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Nesbit SP. Does the cycle of rerestoration lead to larger restorations? J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 1407-1413.
8. Elderton RJ, Nuttall NM. Variation among dentists in planning treatment. Br Dent J 1983; 154: 201-206.
9. Crabb HS. The survival of dental restorations in a teaching hospital. Br Dent J 1981; 150: 315-318.
10. Paterson N. The longevity of restorations. A study of 200 regular attenders in a general dental practice. Br Dent J 1984; 157: 23-25.
11. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitao J, DeRouen TA. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 775-783.
12. Jokstad A, Mjör IA, Qvist V. The age of restorations in situ. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52: 234-242.
13. Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, Hayes C. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 763-772.
14. Bogacki RE, Hunt RJ, del Aguila M, Smith WR. Survival analysis of posterior restorations using an insurance claims database. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 488-492.
15. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 258-269.
16. Eley BM. The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: Possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth. Brit Dent J 1997; 183: 11-14.
17. Mitchell RJ, Koike M, Okabe T. Posterior amalgam restorations-usage, regulation, and longevity. Dental Clin N Am 2007; 51: 573-589.
18. Burke FJ, Shortall AC. Successful restoration of load-bearing cavities in posterior teeth with direct-replacement resin-based composite. Dental update 2001; 28: 388-394, 396, 398.
19. Ben-Gal G, Weiss EI. Trends in material choice for posterior restorations in an israeli dental school: composite resin versus amalgam. J Dent Educ 2011; 75: 1590-1595.
20. Berry TG, Summitt JB, Chung AK, Osborne JW. Amalgam at the new millennium. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 1547-1556.
21. Vidnes-Kopperud S, Tveit AB, Espelid I. Changes in the treatment concept for approximal caries from 1983 to 2009 in Norway. Caries Res 2011; 45: 113-120.
22. Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, van Dijken JW, Funegard U, Lindberg A, Nilsson M. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden. J Dent 2009; 37: 673-678.
23. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 2-8.
24. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 481-508.
25. Black GV. Pathology of the hard tissue of the teeth. In: Operative Dentistry. Vol. 1. Chicago: Medico-Dental Publishing Company, 1908.
26. Peters MC, McLean ME. Minimally invasive operative care. I. Minimal intervention and concepts for minimally invasive cavity preparations. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 7-16.
27. McComb D. Systematic review of conservative operative caries management strategies. J Dent Educ 2001; 65: 1154-1161.
28. Simecek JW, Diefenderfer KE, Cohen ME. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140: 200-209.
29. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent 2003; 31: 395-405.
30. Mjör IA. Long term cost of restorative therapy using different materials. Scand J Dent Res 1992; 100: 60-65.
31. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Cenci MS, Huysmans MC, Wilson NH. Age of failed restorations: a deceptive longevity parameter. J Dent 2011; 39: 225-230.
32. Vahanikkila H, Miettunen J, Tjaderhane L, Larmas M, Nieminen P. The use of time-to-event methods in dental research: a comparison based on five dental journals over a 11-year period. Community Dent Oral 2012; 40: 36-42.
33. Opdam NJ, Loomans BA, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. J Dent 2004; 32: 379-383.
34. Pandis N. The evidence pyramid and introduction to randomized controlled trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 446-447.
35. Mjör IA. Practice-based dental research. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34: 913-920.
36. Hickel R, Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 41D-54D.
37. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig 2007; 11: 5-33.
38. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 45-64.
39. Mackert JR Jr, Wahl MJ. Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam? J Calif Dent Assoc 2004; 32: 601-610.
40. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC. The 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 1063-1067.
41. Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Donassollo TA, Cenci MS, Loguercio AD, Moraes RR, Bronkhorst EM, Opdam NJ, Demarco FF. The 22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 955-963.
42. Kuper NK, Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Huysmans MC. The influence of approximal restoration extension on the development of secondary caries. J Dent 2012; 40: 241-247.
43. Demarco FF, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 87-101.
44. Kidd EA. Diagnosis of secondary caries. J Dent Educ 2001; 65: 997-1000.
45. Mjör IA. Clinical diagnosis of recurrent caries. J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136: 1426-1433.
46. Magalhaes CS, Freitas AB, Moreira AN, Ferreira EF. Validity of staining and marginal ditching as criteria for diagnosis of secondary caries around occlusal amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Braz Dent J 2009; 20: 307-313.
47. Kidd EA, Beighton D. Prediction of secondary caries around tooth-colored restorations: a clinical and microbiological study. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1942-1946.
48. Kidd EA, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D. Marginal ditching and staining as a predictor of secondary caries around amalgam restorations: a clinical and microbiological study. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1206-1211.
49. Espelid I, Tveit AB. Diagnosis of secondary caries and crevices adjacent to amalgam. Int Dent J 1991; 41: 359-364.
50. Vidnes-Kopperud S, Tveit AB, Gaarden T, Sandvik L, Espelid I. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients. Acta Odontol Scand 2009; 67: 74-79.
51. Mejare I, Stenlund H, Zelezny-Holmlund C. Caries incidence and lesion progression from adolescence to young adulthood: a prospective 15-year cohort study in Sweden. Caries Res 2004; 38: 130-141.
52. Hawthorne WS, Smales RJ. Factors influencing long-term restoration survival in three private dental practices in Adelaide. Aust Dent J 1997; 42: 59-63.
53. Shwartz M, Pliskin JS, Grondahl HG, Boffa J. Use of the Kaplan-Meier estimate to reduce biases in estimating the rate of caries progression. Community Dent Oral 1984; 12: 103-108.
54. Carlos JP, Gittelsohn AM. Longitudinal studies of the natural history of caries. II. A life-table study of caries incidence in the permanent teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1965; 10: 739-751.
55. Kidd EA, Nyvad B, Espelid I. Caries control for the individual patient. In: Feierskov O, Kidd EA, eds Dental Caries - The disease and its clinical management, 2nd edn. Vol. 27. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard, 2008; 487-504.
56. Fontana M, Zero DT. Assessing patients' caries risk. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 1231-1239.
57. Zhang Q, van Palenstein Helderman WH. Caries experience variables as indicators in caries risk assessment in 6-7-year-old Chinese children. J Dent 2006; 34: 676-681.
58. Powell LV. Caries prediction: a review of the literature. Community Dent Oral 1998; 26: 361-371.
59. Bjertness E. The importance of oral hygiene on variation in dental caries in adults. Acta Odontol Scand 1991; 49: 97-102.
60. Mascarenhas AK. Oral hygiene as a risk indicator of enamel and dentin caries. Community Dent Oral 1998; 26: 331-339.
61. Stecksen-Blicks C, Gustafsson L. Impact of oral hygiene and use of fluorides on caries increment in children during one year. Community Dent Oral 1986; 14: 185-189.
62. Vehkalahti MM, Vrbic VL, Peric LM, Matvoz ES. Oral hygiene and root caries occurrence in Slovenian adults. Int Dent J 1997; 47: 26-31.
63. Lewis DW, Ismail AI. Periodic health examination, 1995 update: 2. Prevention of dental caries. The Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Can Med Assoc J 1995; 152: 836-846.
64. Kreulen C. Five-year failure and cost-effectiveness of box-only composite restorations. J Dent Res 1998; 787 (Abstract 1244).
65. Lumley PJ, Fisher FJ. Tunnel restorations: a long-term pilot study over a minimum of five years. J Dent 1995; 23: 213-215.
66. Nordbø H, Leirskar J, von der Fehr FR. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int 1998; 29: 5-11.
67. Chung SM, Yap AU, Tsai KT, Yap FL. Elastic modulus of resin-based dental restorative materials: a microindentation approach. J Biomed Mater Res B 2005; 72: 246-253.
68. Kwon W, Kim KH, Son K, Park JK. The Effect of Elastic Moduli of Restorative Materials on the Stress of Non-Carious Cervical Lesion 13th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering. 2009; 23: 2030-2033.
69. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 497-503.
70. Wang NJ, Schiøth JT. Ikke møtt til avtalt time - et problem? Ressursbruk i offentlig tannhelsetjeneste. Nor Tannlegeforen Tid 2000; 110: 874-877.
71. Skaret E, Raadal M, Kvale G, Berg E. Missed and cancelled appointments among 12-18-year-olds in the Norwegian Public Dental Service. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106: 1006-1012.
72. Wang NJ, Aspelund GO. Children who break dental appointments. Eur Arc Paediatr Dent 2009; 10: 11-14.