Evaluation criteria for information systems development methodologies

Association for Information Systems - 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2005: A Conference on a Human Scale

Volumn 7, Issue , 2005, Pages 3487-3492

  Siau, Keng ^a   Tan, Xin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Brainstorming; Content analysis; Evaluation criteria; Information systems development methodologies

Indexed keywords

BRAINSTORMING; CONTENT ANALYSIS; EVALUATION CRITERIA; FIELD STUDIES; INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGIES;

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84869744633     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Avison, D., and Fitzgerald, G. (1995) Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools, (Second ed.) McGraw-Hill International, Glasgow, Great Britain.
2. Avison, D., and Fitzgerald, G. (2003) Where now for development methodologies? Communications of the ACM, 46, 1, 79-82.
3. Dekleva, S.M. (1992) The influence of the information systems development approach on maintenance, MIS Quarterly, 16,3, 355-372.
4. Dennis, A.R., and Valacich, J.S. (1993) Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 4, 531-537.
5. Edwards, H.M., Thompson, J.B., and Smith, P. (1989a) Experiences in use of SSADM: Series of case studies, Information and Software Technology, 31, 8, 411-428.
6. Edwards, H.M., Thompson, J.B., and Smith, P. (1989b) Results of survey of use of SSADM in commercial and government sectors in United Kingdom, Information and Software Technology, 31, 1, 21-28.
7. Gallupe, R.B., Bastianutti, L.M., and Cooper, W.H. (1991) Unblocking brainstorms, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 1, 137-142.
8. Grant, D., and Ngwenyama, O. (2003) A report on the use of action research to evaluate a manufacturing information systems development methodology in a company, Information Systems Journal, 13, 1, 21-35.
9. Jayaratna, N. (1994) Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies: NIMSAD, a Systematic Framework, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead, UK.
10. Klein, H.K., and Hirschheim, R. (1991) Rationality concepts in information systems development methodologies, Accounting, Management & Information Technology, 1, 2, 157-187.
11. Lyytinen, K. (1987) Different perspectives on information systems: problems and solutions, ACM Computing Surveys, 19, 1, 5-46.
12. Miles, M., and Huberman, A.M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: an expanded sourcebook, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
13. Nagasundaram, M., and Dennis, A.R. (1993) When a group is not a group: The cognitive foundation of group idea generation, Small Group Research, 24, 4, 463-489.
14. Nielsen, P.A. (1989) Reflections on development methods for information systems, Office: Technology & People, 5, 2, 81-104.
15. Olle, T.W., Sol, H.G., and Tully, C.J. (1983) Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Feature Analysis, North- Holland, Amsterdam.
16. Olle, T.W., Sol, H.G., and Verrigin-Stuart, A.A. (1982) Information Systems Design Methodologies: A Comparative Review, North Holland, Amsterdam.
17. Olle, T.W., Sol, H.G., and Verrigin-Stuart, A.A. (1986) Information Systems Design Methodologies: Improving the Practice, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
18. Siau, K., and Rossi, M. (1998) Evaluating information modeling methods - A review, Proceedings of Thirty-first Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-31), January 6-9, Big Island, HI, USA, IEEE Computer Society, Big Island, HI, 314-322.