A new in-situ approach for hydromechanical characterization of mesoscale fractures: The High-pulse poroelasticity protocol (HPPP)

42nd U.S. Rock Mechanics - 2nd U.S.-Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Guglielmi, Yves ^a   Cappa, Frédéric ^a   Virieux, Jean ^b   Rutqvist, Jonny ^c   Tsang, Chin Fu ^c   Thoraval, Alain ^d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NICE SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^c LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d INSTITUT NATIONAL DE L ENVIRONNEMENT INDUSTRIEL ET DES RISQUES INERIS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELASTIC MODELS; FLUID PRESSURES; FRACTURE ROUGHNESS; FULLY-COUPLED; HIGH FREQUENCY MEASUREMENTS; IN-SITU; MESOSCALE; MESOSCOPIC SCALE; PORO-ELASTICITY; PRESSURE PULSE TEST; ROCK FRACTURES; SHEAR DISPLACEMENT;

FIBER OPTIC SENSORS; HYDRAULICS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; ROCK MECHANICS; ROCKS; STIFFNESS;

FRACTURE;

EID: 84869697767     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Rutqvist, J. and O. Stephansson. 2003. The role of hydromechanical coupling in fractured rock engineering. Hydrogeology Journal, 11, 7-40.
2. Patton, F.D. 1966. Multiple Modes of Shear of Failure in Rock. In Proc. 1st Cong. Int. Soc. Rock Mech., Lisbon, 509-513.
3. Landanyi, B., and G. Archambault. 1970. Simulation of shear behaviour of a jointed rock mass. In Proc. of the 11th Symp. on Rock Mech. (AIME), 105-125.
4. Barton, N., and V. Choubey. 1977. Shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Int. J. Rock Mech. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr. 10, 1-54.
5. Amadei, B., J. Wobowo, S. Sture, and R.H. Price. 1998. Applicability of existing models to predict the behavior of replicas of natural fractures of welded tuff under different boundary conditions. Geotech. Geo. Eng., 16, 79-128.
6. Saeb, S., and B. Amadei. 1992. Modelling rock joints under shear and normal loading. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., 29, 267-278.
7. Plesha, M.E. 1987. Constitutive models for rock discontinuities with dilatancy and surface degradation. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., 11, 345-362.
8. ISRM. 1978. Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 15, 319-368.
9. Aydin, A., and A. Basu. 2005. The Schmidt hammer in rock material characterization. Engineering Geology, 81, 1-14.
10. Laubscher, D.H. 1990. A geomechanics classification system for rating of rock mass in mine design. J. South African Inst. of Mining and Metallurgy, 90(10), 257-273.
11. Bandis, S.C., A.C. Lumsden, and N.R. Barton. 1983. Fundamentals of Rock Joints Deformation. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 20(6), 249-268.
12. Barton, N. 2002. Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int. J. of Rock Mech. & Min. Sci., 39, 185-216.
13. Barton, N., and S. Bandis. 1990. Review of predictive capabilities of JRC-JCS model in engineering practice. In Rock Joints, Barton & Stephansson (eds). Balkema, Rotterdam. ISBN 90 6191 109 5, 603-610.
14. Hack, H.R.G.K. 1993. Slopes in rock. In Proc. an overview of engineering geology in the Netherlands. Ed. DIG. Technical University Felft, The Netherlands, 111-119.
15. Gentier, S.S., J. Riss, G. Archambault, R. Flamand, and D.L. Hopkins. 2000. Influence of fracture geometry on sheared behaviour. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 37, 161-174.
16. Olsson, W.A., and S.R. Brown. 1993. Hydromechanical response of a fracture undergoing compression and shear. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 30, 845-851.
17. Gentier, S.S., E. Lamontagne, G. Archambault, and J. Riss. 1997. Anisotropy of flow in fracture undergoing shear and its relationship to the direction of shearing and injection pressure. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 34(3-4), paper No. 094.
18. Li, B., Y. Jiang, T. Koyama, L. Jing, and Y. Tanabashi. 2007. Experimental study of the hydro-mechanical behavior of rock joints using a parallel-plate model containing contact areas and artificial fractures. Int. J. of Rock Mech. & Min. Sci., in press.
19. Cappa F, Guglielmi Y, Fénart P, Merrien-Soukatchoff V, Thoraval A. 2005. Hydromechanical interactions in a fractured carbonate reservoir inferred from hydraulic and mechanical measurements. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. 42, pp. 287-306.
20. Cappa, F., Y. Guglielmi, J. Rutqvist, C-F. Tsang, and A. Thoraval. 2006. Hydromechanical modeling of pulse tests that measure both fluid pressure and fracture-normal displacement at Coaraze Laboratory Site, France. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci., 43, 1062-1082.
21. Cooper, H.H., J.D. Bredehoeft, and I.S. Papadopulos. 1967. Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Water Resour. Res., 3, 263-269.
22. Paillet, F.L., 1993, Application of borehole geophysics in the characterization of flow in fractured rocks. In Trends in Geophysical Research, review volume, 127-153: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 93-4214, 36 p.
23. Witherspoon, P.A., J.S.Y. Wang, K. Iwai, and J.E. Gale. 1980. Validity of Cubic Law for Fluid Flow in a Deformable Rock Fracture. Water Resour. Res., 16, 1016-1024.