Towards an accessible personal health record

Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

Volumn 83 LNICST, Issue , 2012, Pages 61-68

  Basdekis, Ioannis ^a   Sakkalis, Vangelis ^a   Stephanidis, Constantine ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Accessible electronic PHR (ePHR); Disabled people; E Accessibility; Personal health record (PHR); WCAG

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBLE ELECTRONIC PHR (EPHR); DISABLED PEOPLE; E-ACCESSIBILITY; PERSONAL HEALTH RECORD; WCAG;

HEALTH CARE; MOBILE DEVICES; WEB SERVICES;

HANDICAPPED PERSONS;

EID: 84869598486     PISSN: 18678211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29734-2_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): ADA standards for accessible design, http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/stdspdf.htm
2. Geven, A., Sefelin, R., Tscheligi, M.: Depth and breadth away from the desktop: the optimal information hierarchy for mobile use. In: Mobile HCI 2006, pp. 157-164 (2006)
3. Basdekis, I., Alexandraki, C., Mourouzis, A., Stephanidis, C.: Incorporating Accessibility in Web-Based Work Environments: Two Alternative Approaches and Issues Involved. In: Proceedings of the 11th HCI International 2005, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (2005)
4. Basdekis, I., Karampelas, P., Doulgeraki, V., Stephanidis, C.: Designing Universally Accessible Networking Services for a Mobile Personal Assistant. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2009, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5615, pp. 279-288. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
5. Basdekis, I., Klironomos, I., Metaxas, I., Stephanidis, C.: An overview of web accessibility in Greece: a comparative study 2004-2008. Universal Access in the Information Society 9(2), 185-190 (2010)
6. Cabinet Office: eAccessibility of public sector services in the European Union (2005), http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20060925031332/ cabinetoffice.gov.uk/e-government/resources/eaccessibility/
7. DeJong, G., Palsbo, S.E., Beatty, P.W., Jones, G.C., Knoll, T., Neri, M.T.: The organization and financing of health services for persons with disabilities. Milbank Quarterly 80, 261-301 (2002)
8. E.U. Communication COM/2004/0356 final, The eHealth action plan, http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52004DC0356:EN:HTML
9. Buchanan, G., Farrant, S., Jones, M., Thimbleby, H., Marsden, G., Pazzani, M.: Improving mobile internet usability. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web, Hong Kong, May 1-5, pp. 673-680 (2001)
10. Government Accessibility Standards and WCAG 2.0, http://blog.powermapper. com/blog/post/Government-Accessibility-Standards.aspx
11. Karampelas, P., Basdekis, I., Stephanidis, C.: Web User Interface Design Strategy: Designing for Device Independence. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5614, pp. 515-524. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
12. Lober, W., Zierler, B., Herbaugh, A., Shinstrom, S., Stolyar, A., Kim, E., Kim, Y.: Barriers to the use of a Personal Health Record by an Elderly Population. In: AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc., pp. 514-518 (2006)
13. Neri, M.T., Kroll, T.: Understanding the Consequences of Access Barriers to Health Care: Experiences of Adults with Disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation 25(2), 85-96 (2003)
14. Nomensa: United Nations global audit of web accessibility (2006), http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/documents/fnomensarep.pdf
15. Stephanidis, C.: User Interfaces for All: New perspectives into Human-Computer Interaction. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) User Interfaces for All - Concepts, Methods, and Tools, pp. 3-17, 760 pages. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2001) ISBN 0-8058-2967-9
16. TAW tool, http://www.tawdis.net/taw3/cms/en
17. Taylor, D., Hoenig, H.: Access to health care services for the disabled elderly. Health Serv. Res. 41 (Pt 1), 743-758 (2006)
18. Total Validator, http://www.totalvalidator.com/
19. Tsiknakis, M., Spanakis, M.: Adoption of innovative eHealth services in prehospital emergency management: a case study. In: 10th IEEE International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine (ITAB), Corfu (November 2010)
20. UN - Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
21. U.S.Rehabilitation Act (1973). Section504 (1973), http://www.dol.gov/ oasam/regs/statutes/sec504.htm
22. U.S.Rehabilitation Act (1973). Section 508 (1973), http://www.section508. gov/index.cfm?fuseAction=stdsdoc
23. W3C-WAI, Shared Web Experiences: Barriers Common to Mobile Device Users and People with Disabilities (2007), http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/experiences
24. W3C-WAI, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, http://www.w3.org/TR/ WCAG20/
25. W3C-WAI, Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0, http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/
26. W3C-ARIA Overview, http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/aria
27. Web Portal of the Hellenic General Secretariat for Research and Technology, Ministry of Education and Lifelong Learning, http://www.gsrt.gr
28. Web portal Universally Accessible eServices for Disabled People, http://www.ameanet.gr
29. West, D.M., Miller, E.A.: The digital divide in public e-health: Barriers to accessibility and privacy in state health department websites. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 17, 652-667 (2006)