A prospective case-control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life

Techniques in Coloproctology

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 355-362

  Vaughan Shaw, P G ^a   Cheung, T ^b   Knight, J S ^a   Nichols, P H ^a   Pilkington, S A ^a   Mirnezami, A H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adenocarcinoma pathology; Adenocarcinoma surgery; Colorectal surgery methods; Perineum surgery; Rectal neoplasms pathology; Rectal neoplasms surgery

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; ANTIEMETIC AGENT; CAPECITABINE;

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADJUVANT THERAPY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CATHETER REMOVAL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; EORTC QLQ-CR29; EORTC QLQ-CR30; EXTRALEVATOR ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH STATUS; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; IMPOTENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERMITTENT CATHETERIZATION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OPERATION DURATION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; RECTUM CANCER; RECTUM RESECTION; REOPERATION; SMALL INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; SURGICAL MESH; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY CATHETER; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ABDOMEN; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; OPERATIVE TIME; PERINEUM; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGICAL MESH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84869502975     PISSN: 11236337     EISSN: 1128045X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0851-4     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, Sexton R, MacFarlane JK (1998) Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997. Arch Surg 133:894-899
2. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23:9257-9264
3. Heald RJ, Smedh RK, Kald A, Sexton R, Moran BJ (1997) Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum-an endangered operation. Norman Nigro Lectureship. Dis Colon Rectum 40:747-751
4. Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Syse A, Haffner J, Wiig JN (2004) Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway. Br J Surg 91:210-216
5. Wibe A, Syse A, Andersen E, Tretli S, Myrvold HE, Soreide O (2004) Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47:48-58
6. Miles WE (1971) A method of performing abdomino-perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon (1908). CA Cancer J Clin 21:361-364
7. Holm T, Ljung A, Haggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J (2007) Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94:232-238
8. West NP, Finan PJ, Anderin C, Lindholm J, Holm T, Quirke P (2008) Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3517-3522
9. Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J et al (2005) The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg 242:74-82
10. King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P et al (2006) The influence of an enhanced recovery programme on clinical outcomes, costs and quality of life after surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 8:506-513
11. ACPGBI (2007) Guidelines for the management of colorectal cancer. http://www.acpgbi.org.uk/assets/documents/COLO-guides.pdf. Accessed 2nd February 2011
12. Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, van de Velde CJ, van Krieken JH (2002) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Am J Surg Pathol 26:350-357
13. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQC30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365-376
14. Whistance RN, Conroy T, Chie W et al (2009) Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 45:3017-3026
15. Gujral S, Conroy T, Fleissner C et al (2007) Assessing quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer: an update of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire. Eur J Cancer 43:1564-1573
16. West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ, Holm T, Quirke P (2010) Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:588-599
17. Nisar PJ, Scott HJ (2009) Myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the pelvis after abdominoperineal excision. Colorectal Dis 11:806-816
18. Han JG, Wang ZJ, Gao ZG, Xu HM, Yang ZH, Jin ML (2010) Pelvic floor reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix after cylindrical abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 53:219-223
19. Boereboom CL, Watson NF, Sivakumar R, Hurst NG, Speake WJ (2009) Biological tissue graft for pelvic floor reconstruction after cylindrical abdominoperineal excision of the rectum and anal canal. Tech Coloproctol 13:257-258
20. Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2011) Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 149:830-840
21. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ (2002) Objective assessment of morbidity and quality of life after surgery for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 4:61-66
22. Ortiz H, Armendariz P (1996) Anterior resection: do the patients perceive any clinical benefit? Int J Colorectal Dis 11:191-195
23. Pachler J, Wille-Jorgensen P (2005) Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD004323
24. Bloemen JG, Visschers RG, Truin W, Beets GL, Konsten JL (2009) Long-term quality of life in patients with rectal cancer: association with severe postoperative complications and presence of a stoma. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1251-1258
25. Gervaz P, Bucher P, Konrad B et al (2008) A Prospective longitudinal evaluation of quality of life after abdominoperineal resection. J Surg Oncol 97:14-19
26. Cornish JA, Tilney HS, Heriot AG, Lavery IC, Fazio VW, Tekkis PP (2007) A meta-analysis of quality of life for abdominoperineal excision of rectum versus anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2056-2068
27. Hendren SK, O'Connor BI, Liu M et al (2005) Prevalence of male and female sexual dysfunction is high following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 242:212-223
28. Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (2002) Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 89:1551-1556
29. Fukunaga Y, Higashino M, Tanimura S et al (2007) Laparoscopic mesorectal excision with preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerves for rectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 54:85-90
30. Schmidt CE, Bestmann B, Kuchler T, Longo WE, Kremer B (2005) Prospective evaluation of quality of life of patients receiving either abdominoperineal resection or sphincter-preserving procedure for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 12:117-123