Benchmarking cow comfort on North American freestall dairies: Lameness, leg injuries, lying time, facility design, and management for high-producing Holstein dairy cows

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 95, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 7399-7408

  Von Keyserlingk, M A G ^a   Barrientos, A ^a   Ito, K ^a,b   Galo, E ^b   Weary, D M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b NOVUS INTERNATIONAL INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal welfare; Hock injury; Lameness; Stall design

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL LAMENESS; ANIMAL WELFARE; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CONSTRUCTION WORK AND ARCHITECTURAL PHENOMENA; DAIRYING; FEMALE; LEG INJURY; METHODOLOGY; NORTH AMERICA; PREVALENCE; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARD;

ANIMAL WELFARE; ANIMALS; BENCHMARKING; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FACILITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HOUSING, ANIMAL; LAMENESS, ANIMAL; LEG INJURIES; NORTH AMERICA; PREVALENCE;

ANIMALIA; BOS;

EID: 84869494451     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-5807     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bernardi F., Fregonosi J., Veira D.M., Winkler C., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. The stall-design paradox: Neck rails increase lameness but improve udder and stall hygiene. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:3074-3080.
2. Bicalho R.C., Vokey F., Erb H.N., Guard C.L. Visual locomotion scoring in the first seventy days in milk: Impact on pregnancy and survival. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:4586-4591.
3. Bicalho R.C., Warnick L.D., Guard C.L. Strategies to analyze milk losses caused by diseases with potential incidence throughout the lactation: A lameness example. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:2653-2661.
4. Byrt T., Bishop J., Carlin J.B. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1993, 46:423-429.
5. Camp R. Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices That Lead to Superior Performance 1989, ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI.
6. CCAC Guidelines on the Care and Use of Farm Animals in Research, Teaching and Testing. Can. Counc. Anim 2009, Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC), Care, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
7. Chapinal N., de Passillé A.M., Weary D.M., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Rushen J. Using gait score, walking speed, and lying behavior to detect hoof lesions in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:4365-4374.
8. Cook N.B. Prevalence of lameness among dairy cattle in Wisconsin as a function of housing type and stall surface. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2003, 223:1324-1328.
9. Cook N.B., Bennett T.B., Nordlund K.V. Monitoring indices of cow comfort in free-stall-housed dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88:3876-3885.
10. Cook N.B., Nordlund K.V. The influence of the environment on dairy cow behaviour, claw health and herd lameness dynamics. Vet. J. 2009, 179:360-369.
11. Dippel S., Dolezal M., Brenninkmeyer C., Brinkmann J., March S., Knierim U., Winckler C. Risk factors for lameness in freestall housed dairy cows across two breeds, farming systems, and countries. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:5476-5486.
12. Drissler M., Gaworski M., Tucker C.B., Weary D.M. Freestall maintenance: Effects on lying behavior on dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88:2381-2387.
13. Espejo L.A., Endres M.I. Herd-level risk factors for lameness in high-producing Holstein cows housed in freestall barns. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:306-314.
14. Espejo L.A., Endres M.I., Salfer J.A. Prevalence of lameness in high-producing Holstein cows housed in freestall barns in Minnesota. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89:3052-3058.
15. Faull W.B., Hughes J.W., Clarkson M.J., Downham D.Y., Manson F.J., Metcalf J.A., Murray R.D., Russell A.M., Sutherst J.E., Ward W.R. Epidemiology of lameness in dairy cattle: The influence of cubicles and indoor and outdoor walking surfaces. Vet. Rec. 1996, 139:130-136.
16. Flower F.C., Weary D.M. Effect of hoof pathologies on subjective assessments of dairy cow gait. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89:139-146.
17. Fregonesi J.A., Tucker C.B., Weary D.M. Overstocking reduces lying time in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:3349-3354. a.
18. Fregonesi J.A., Veira D.M., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Weary D.M. Effects of bedding quality on lying behavior of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:5468-5472. b.
19. Fulwider W.K., Grandin T., Garrick D.J., Engle T.E., Lamm W.D., Dalsted N.L., Rollin B.E. Influence of free-stall base on tarsal joint lesions and hygiene in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:3559-3566.
20. Garbarino E.J., Hernandez J.A., Shearer J.K., Risco C.A., Thatcher W.W. Effect of lameness on ovarian activity in postpartum Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87:4123-4131.
21. Green L.E., Hedges V.J., Schukken Y.H., Blowey R.W., Packington A.J. The impact of clinical lameness on the milk yield of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85:2250-2256.
22. Ito K., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., LeBlanc S.J., Weary D.M. Lying behavior as an indicator of lameness in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:3553-3560.
23. Ito K., Weary D.M., von Keyserlingk M.A.G. Lying behavior: Assessing within- and between-herd variation in free-stall housed dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:4412-4420.
24. Landis R.J., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:159-174.
25. Leach K.A., Whay H.R., Maggs C.M., Barker Z.E., Paul E.S., Bell A.K., Main D.C.J. Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 2. Understanding dairy farmers' motivations. Res. Vet. Sci. 2010, 89:318-323.
26. Ledgerwood D.N., Winckler C., Tucker C.B. Evaluation of data loggers, sampling intervals, and editing techniques for measuring the lying behavior of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:5129-5139.
27. Leonard F.C., O'Connell J.M., O'Ferrell K.J. Effect of different housing conditions on behaviour and foot lesions in Friesian heifers. Vet. Rec. 1994, 134:490-494.
28. Main D.C.J., Barker Z.E., Leach K.A., Bell N.J., Whay H.R., Browne W.J. Sampling strategies for monitoring lameness in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:1970-1978.
29. Rushen J., Haley D., de Passillé A.M. Effect of softer flooring in tie stalls on resting behaviour and leg injuries of lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:3647-3651.
30. Thomsen P.T., Baadsgaard N.P. Intra- and inter-observer agreement of a protocol for clinical examination of dairy cows. Prev. Vet. Med. 2006, 75:133-139.
31. Tucker C.B., Weary D.M., Fraser D. Effects of three types of free-stall surfaces on preferences and stall usage by dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86:521-529.
32. Tucker C.B., Weary D.M., Fraser D. Free-stall dimensions: Effects on preference and stall usage. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87:1208-1216.
33. Tucker C.B., Zdanowicz G., Weary D.M. Brisket boards reduce freestall use. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89:2603-2607.
34. von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Rushen J., de Passillé A.M., Weary D.M. Improving dairy cattle welfare: Key concepts and the role of science. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:4101-4111.
35. Warnick L.D., Janssen D., Guard C.L., Grohn Y.T. The effect of lameness on milk production in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84:1988-1997.
36. Weary D.M., Taszkun I. Hock lesions and free-stall design. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83:697-702.
37. Wechsler B., Schaub J., Friedli K., Hauser R. Behaviour and leg injuries in dairy cows kept in cubicle systems with straw bedding or soft lying mats. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000, 69:189-197.
38. Whay H.R., Main D.C.J., Green L.E., Webster A.J.F. Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: Direct observations and investigation of farm records. Vet. Rec. 2003, 153:197-202.
39. Zurbrigg K., Kelton D., Anderson N., Millman S. Tie-stall design and its relationship to lameness, injury, and cleanliness on 317 Ontario dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88:3201-3210.