THE IMPACT OF CASE ON IS PROFESSIONALS' WORK AND MOTIVATION TO USE CASE

Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 1997

Volumn , Issue , 1997, Pages 89-105

  Iivari, Juhani ^a   Maansaari, Jari ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

CASE; extrinsic motivation; intrinsic motivation; motivation; subjective norm; usage

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; MOTIVATION;

COMPUTER AIDED SYSTEM/SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER-AIDED SYSTEM SOFTWARES; EXTRINSIC MOTIVATION; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; JOB CHARACTERISTICS; PAPER ANALYSIS; SUBJECTIVE NORM; SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; SYSTEM SOFTWARES; USAGE;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84869437540     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Aaen, I.; Siltanen, A.; Sørensen, C.; and Tahvanainen V.-P. “A Tale of Two Countries: CASE Experiences and Expectations,” in The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies on Information Systems Development, K. E. Kendall, K. Lyytinen, and J. I. DeGross (eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992, pp. 61-91.
2. Adams, D. A.; Nelson, R. R.; and Todd, P. A. “Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication,” MIS Quarterly (16:2), 1992, pp. 227-247.
3. Attewell, P., and Rule, J. “Computing and Organizations: What We Know and What We Don't Know,” Communications of the ACM (27:12), 1984, pp. 1184-1192.
4. Banker, R. D., and Kauffman, R. J. “Reuse and Productivity in Integrated Computer-Aided Software Engineering: An Empirical Study,” MIS Quarterly (15:3), 1991, pp. 375-401.
5. Couger, J. D. “Motivators vs. Demotivators in the IS Environment,” Journal of Systems Management (41:6), 1988, pp. 36-41.
6. Couger, J. D., and Zawacki, R. A. Motivating and Managing Computer Personnel, Wiley, New York, 1980.
7. Davis, F. D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly (13:3), 1989, pp. 319-339.
8. Davis, F. D.; Bagozzi, R. P.; and Warshaw, P. R. “User Acceptance of computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science (35:8), 1989, pp. 982-1003.
9. Davis, F. D.; Bagozzi, R. P.; and Warshaw, P. R. “Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology (22), 1992, pp. 1111-1132.
10. Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. Intrinsic Motivation and Self Determination in Human Behavior, Plenum Press, New York, 1985.
11. Doll, W. J., and Torkzadeh, G. “Discrepancy Model of End-User Computing Involvement,” Management Science (35:10), 1989, pp. 1151-1171.
12. Ferratt, T. W., and Short, L. E. “Are Information Systems People Different: An Investigation of Motivational Differences,” MIS Quarterly (10:4), 1986, pp. 377-387.
13. Fichman, R. G. “Information Technology Diffusion: A Review of Empirical Research,” in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems, J. I. DeGross, J. D. Becker, and J. J. Elam (eds.), Dallas, TX, 1992, pp. 195-206.
14. Finlay, P. N., and Mitchell, A. C. “Perceptions of the Benefits From Introduction of CASE: An Empirical Study,” MIS Quarterly (18:4), 1994, pp. 353-370.
15. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
16. Gill, T. G. “Expert System Usage: Task Change and Intrinsic Motivation,” MIS Quarterly (20:3), 1996, pp. 301-329.
17. Ginzberg, M. J. “Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions,” Management Science (27:4), 1981a, pp. 459-478.
18. Ginzberg, M. J. “Key Recurrent Issues in the MIS Implementation Process,” MIS Quarterly, 1981b, pp. 47-59.
19. Guinan, P. J.; Cooprider, J.; and Sawyer, S. “The Effective Use of Automated Application Development Tools,” IBM Systems Journal (36:1), 1997, pp. 124-139.
20. Hackman, J. R., and Lawler, E. E. “Employee Reactions to Job Characteristics,” Journal of Applied Psychology (55), 1971, pp. 259-286.
21. Hackman, J. R., and Oldham, G. R. Work Redesign, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1980.
22. Hartwick, J., and Barki, H. “Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use,” Management Science (40:4), 1994, pp. 440-465.
23. Hofstede, G. Cultures and Organizations: Software for the Mind, McGraw-Hill, London, 1991.
24. Igbaria, M.; Guimaraes, T.; and Davis, G. B. “Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model,” Journal of Management Information Systems (11:4), 1995a, pp. 87-114.
25. Igbaria, M., and Iivari, J. “The Effects of Self-Efficacy on Computer Usage,” Omega (23:6), 1995, pp. 587-605.
26. Igbaria, M.; Iivari, J.; and Maragahh, H. “Why Do Individuals Use Computer Technology? A Finnish Case Study,” Information & Management (29), 1995b, pp. 227-238.
27. Iivari, J. “Factors Affecting Perceptions of CASE Effectiveness,” European Journal of Information Systems (4:4), 1995, pp. 143-158.
28. Iivari, J. “Why Are CASE Tools Not Used?” Communications of the ACM (39:10), 1996, pp. 94-103.
29. Kusters, R. J.; ja Wijers, G. M. “On the Practical Use of CASE-Tools: Results of a Survey,” CASE'93, Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on CASE, Singapore, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1993, pp. 2-10.
30. Lawler III, E. E. Motivation in Work Organizations, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Monterey, CA, 1973.
31. Leonard-Barton, D., and Deschamps, I. “Managerial Influence in the Implementation of New Technology,” Management Science (34:10), 1988, pp. 1252-1265.
32. Mathieson, K. “Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior,” Information Systems Research (2:3), 1991, pp. 173-191.
33. Moore, G. C., and Benbasat, I. “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting Information Technology Innovation,” Information Systems Research (2:3), 1991, pp. 192-222.
34. Norman, R. J., and Nunamaker Jr., J. F. “CASE Productivity Perceptions of Software Engineering Professionals,” Communications of the ACM (32:9), 1989, pp. 1102-1108.
35. Nunally, J. C. Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
36. Orlikowksi, W. “Division Among Ranks: The Social Implications of CASE Tools for Systems Developers,” in Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information Systems, J. I. DeGross, J. C. Henderson, and B. R. Konsynski (eds.), New York, 1989, pp. 199-200.
37. Orlikowski, W. “CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development,” MIS Quarterly (17:3), 1993, pp. 309-340.
38. Premkumar, G., and Potter, M. “Adoption of Computer Aided Software Engineering (CASE) Technology: An Innovation Adoption Perspective,” DataBase (26:2&3), 1995, pp. 105-124.
39. Rai, A. “External Information Source and Channel Effectiveness and the Diffusion of CASE Innovations: An Empirical Study,” European Journal of Information Systems (4), 1995, pp. 93-102.
40. Rai, A., and Howard, G. S. “Propagating CASE Usage for Software Development: An Empirical Investigation of Key Organizational Correlates,” Omega (22:2), 1994, pp. 133-147.
41. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovation, Free Press, New York, 1995.
42. Rubnik-Miklic, E., and Zupancic, J. “Experiences and Expectations with CASE Technology: An Example from Slovenia,” Information & Management (28:6), 1995, pp. 377-391.
43. Selemat, M. H.; Choong, C. Y.; Othman, A. T.; and Rahim, M. M. “Non-Use Phenomenon of CASE Tools: Malaysian Experience,” Information and Software Technology (36:9), 1994, pp. 531-537.
44. Szajna, B. “Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model,” Management Science (42:1), 1996, pp. 85-92.
45. Urwiler, R.; Ramarapu, N. K.; Wilkes, R. B.; and Frolick, M. N. “Computer-Aided Software Engineering: The Determinants of an Effective Implementation Strategy,” Information & Management (29), 1995, pp. 215-225.
46. Webster, J., and Martocchio, J. J. “Microcomputer Playfulness: Development of a Measure with Workplace Implications,” MIS Quarterly (16:2), 1992, pp. 201-224.
47. Wynekoop, J. L.; Senn, J. A.; and Conger, S. A. “The Implementation of CASE Tools: An Innovation Diffusion Approach” in The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies on Information Systems Development, K. E. Kendall, K. Lyytinen, and J. I. DeGross (eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992, pp. 25-41.