Reply to invited comment on "Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade III-IV prolapsing hemorrhoids: A two-year prospective controlled study" by I. Khubchandani

Techniques in Coloproctology

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 347-348

  Ren, D L ^a   Lin, H C ^a  

^a THE SIXTH AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANUS DISEASE; ANUS STENOSIS; ANUS SURGERY; CAUTERIZATION; CIRCULAR STAPLED HEMORRHOIDOPEXY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOID PROLAPSE; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NOTE; PARTIAL STAPLED HEMORRHOIDOPEXY; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTOVAGINAL FISTULA; SURGICAL ERROR; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84869435538     PISSN: 11236337     EISSN: 1128045X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0864-z     Document Type: Note

References (3)

1. Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZH, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 95:147-160
2. Pescatori M, Gagliardi G (2008) Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol 12:7-19
3. Lin HC, Ren DL, He QL et al (2012) Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade III-IV prolapsing hemorrhoids: a two-year prospective controlled study. Tech Coloproctol. doi:10.1007/s10151-012- 0815-8. PMID: 22402919