Concurrent vs. post-task usability test ratings

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 289-290

  Teague, Ross ^a   De Jesus, Katherine ^a   Nunes Ueno, Marcos ^a  

^a INTEL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Concurrent; Post task ratings; Questionnaires; Rating scales; Retrospective; Subjective ratings; Usability testing

Indexed keywords

CONCURRENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; RATING SCALE; RETROSPECTIVE; SUBJECTIVE RATING; USABILITY TESTING;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

SURVEYS;

EID: 84869432438     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/634067.634238     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Dumas, J.S, and Redish, J.C. A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Intellect Books, Portland, OR, 1999.
2. Hands, D., Avons, S., and Davidoff, J. Duration Neglect in Television Picture Quality Evaluation. In Applied Vision Association 97Dundee Abstracts, 1997.
3. Kantowitz, B.H., Roediger, H.L., & Elmes, D.G. (11997). Experimental Psychology: Understanding Psychological Research. International Thomson Publishing.
4. Orne, M.T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychology experiment. American Psychologist, 17, 776-783.
5. Raghavan, S., and Perlman, G. The Difference of Preference Vs. Performance Can Different for Concurrent Vs. Retrospective Ratings. In Proceedings of the lEA 2000/HFES 2000 Conference. 2000.