Evaluation of phase-sensitive versus magnitude reconstructed inversion recovery imaging for the assessment of myocardial infarction in mice with a clinical magnetic resonance scanner

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1372-1382

  Wildgruber, Moritz ^a   Settles, Marcus ^a   Kosanke, Katja ^a   Bielicki, Isabella ^a   Ntziachristos, Vasilis ^b   Rummeny, Ernst J ^a   Botnar, René M ^c   Huber, Armin M ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; myocardial infarction; phase sensitive inversion recovery

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE; MAGNOGRAF; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY LIGATION; FEMALE; HEART FUNCTION; HEART INFARCTION; HEART INFARCTION SIZE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KINETICS; MAGNITUDE RECONSTRUCTED INVERSION RECOVERY IMAGING; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PHASE SENSITIVE INVERSION RECOVERY IMAGING; PHASE SENSITIVE INVERSION RECOVERY LATE GADOLINIUM ENHANCEMENT IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE SLICE; TWO DIMENSIONAL SEGMENTED INVERSION RECOVERY IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; FEMALE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84869416879     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23789     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Libby P, Ridker PM, Hansson GK,. Progress and challenges in translating the biology of atherosclerosis. Nature 2011; 473: 317-325.
2. Carmeliet P, Collen D,. Transgenic mouse models in angiogenesis and cardiovascular disease. J Pathol 2000; 190: 387-405.
3. Botnar RM, Nagel E,. Structural and functional imaging by MRI. Basic Res Cardiol 2008; 103: 152-160.
4. Yang Z, Berr SS, Gilson WD, Toufektsian MC, French BA,. Simultaneous evaluation of infarct size and cardiac function in intact mice by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging reveals contractile dysfunction in noninfarcted regions early after myocardial infarction. Circulation 2004; 109: 1161-1167.
5. Saeed M, Bremerich J, Wendland MF, Wyttenbach R, Weinmann HJ, Higgins CB,. Reperfused myocardial infarction as seen with use of necrosis-specific versus standard extracellular MR contrast media in rats. Radiology 1999; 213: 247-257.
6. Helm PA, Caravan P, French BA, et al. Postinfarction myocardial scarring in mice: molecular MR imaging with use of a collagen-targeting contrast agent. Radiology 2008; 247: 788-796.
7. Nahrendorf M, Sosnovik D, Chen JW, et al. Activatable magnetic resonance imaging agent reports myeloperoxidase activity in healing infarcts and noninvasively detects the antiinflammatory effects of atorvastatin on ischemia-reperfusion injury. Circulation 2008; 117: 1153-1160.
8. Chapon C, Herlihy AH, Bhakoo KK,. Assessment of myocardial infarction in mice by late gadolinium enhancement MR imaging using an inversion recovery pulse sequence at 9.4T. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008; 10: 6.
9. Waller C, Hiller KH, Kahler E, et al. Serial magnetic resonance imaging of microvascular remodeling in the infarcted rat heart. Circulation 2001; 103: 1564-1569.
10. Bohl S, Lygate CA, Barnes H, et al. Advanced methods for quantification of infarct size in mice using three-dimensional high-field late gadolinium enhancement MRI. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009; 296: H1200-1208.
11. Price AN, Cheung KK, Lim SY, Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ, Lythgoe MF,. Rapid assessment of myocardial infarct size in rodents using multi-slice inversion recovery late gadolinium enhancement CMR at 9.4T. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011; 13: 44.
12. Caravan P, Farrar CT, Frullano L, Uppal R,. Influence of molecular parameters and increasing magnetic field strength on relaxivity of gadolinium- and manganese-based T1 contrast agents. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2009; 4: 89-100.
13. Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J, Requardt M, Weinmann HJ,. Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol 2005; 40: 715-724.
14. Rinck PA, Muller RN,. Field strength and dose dependence of contrast enhancement by gadolinium-based MR contrast agents. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 998-1004.
15. Gilson WD, Kraitchman DL,. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in small rodents using clinical 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners. Methods 2007; 43: 35-45.
16. Voelkl JG, Haubner BJ, Kremser C, et al. Cardiac imaging using clinical 1.5 T MRI scanners in a murine ischemia/reperfusion model. J Biomed Biotechnol 2011; 185683.
17. Kellman P, Arai AE, McVeigh ER, Aletras AH,. Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium-delayed hyperenhancement. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 372-383.
18. Kumar D, Hacker TA, Buck J, et al. Distinct mouse coronary anatomy and myocardial infarction consequent to ligation. Coron Artery Dis 2005; 16: 41-44.
19. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999; 100: 1992-2002.
20. Barkhausen J, Ebert W, Debatin JF, Weinmann HJ,. Imaging of myocardial infarction: comparison of magnevist and gadophrin-3 in rabbits. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1392-1398.
21. Protti A, Sirker A, Shah AM, Botnar R,. Late gadolinium enhancement of acute myocardial infarction in mice at 7T: cine-FLASH versus inversion recovery. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 32: 878-886.
22. Franco F, Dubois SK, Peshock RM, Shohet RV,. Magnetic resonance imaging accurately estimates LV mass in a transgenic mouse model of cardiac hypertrophy. Am J Physiol 1998; 274: H679-683.
23. Franco F, Thomas GD, Giroir B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and invasive evaluation of development of heart failure in transgenic mice with myocardial expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Circulation 1999; 99: 448-454.
24. Makowski M, Jansen C, Webb I, et al. First-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI in mice on a 3-T clinical MR scanner. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64: 1592-1598.
25. Arai T, Kofidis T, Bulte JW, et al. Dual in vivo magnetic resonance evaluation of magnetically labeled mouse embryonic stem cells and cardiac function at 1.5 t. Magn Reson Med 2006; 55: 203-209.
26. Gupta A, Lee VS, Chung YC, Babb JS, Simonetti OP,. Myocardial infarction: optimization of inversion times at delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2004; 233: 921-926.
27. Kellman P, Larson AC, Hsu LY, et al. Motion-corrected free-breathing delayed enhancement imaging of myocardial infarction. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 194-200.
28. Oshinski JN, Yang Z, Jones JR, Mata JF, French BA,. Imaging time after Gd-DTPA injection is critical in using delayed enhancement to determine infarct size accurately with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2001; 104: 2838-2842.
29. Nahrendorf M, Wiesmann F, Hiller KH, et al. In vivo assessment of cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction in rats by cine-magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2000; 2: 171-180.
30. Nahrendorf M, Wiesmann F, Hiller KH, et al. Serial cine-magnetic resonance imaging of left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction in rats. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14: 547-555.