On reviewing of results in design research

Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1388-1397

  Järvinen, Pertti ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Design research; Goal function; Research outcomes; Reviewing

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS NEEDS; DESIGN RESEARCH; GOAL FUNCTIONS; RESEARCH APPROACH; RESEARCH OUTCOME; REVIEWING; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES;

DESIGN; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84869406788     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Aulin A. (1989). Foundations of Mathematical System Dynamics: The Fundamental Theory of Causal Recursion and its Application to Social Science and Economics. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
2. Benbasat I. (2003), private communication.
3. Benbasat I. and Zmud R.W. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS Quarterly, 27 (2), 183-194.
4. Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16 (6), 1021-1046.
5. Brooks F.P. (1987). No silver bullet: Essence and accidents of software engineering. IEEE Computer, 20 (4), 10-19.
6. Buchanan D.A. (2003). Getting the story straight: Illusions and delusions in the organizational change process. Tamara Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science, 2 (4), 7-21.
7. Christiaanse E. and Venkatraman N. (2002). Beyond SABRE: An empirical test of expertise exploitation in electronic channels. MIS Quarterly, 26 (1), 15-38.
8. Chua C.E.H., Khoo, H.M., Straub D.W. and Kadiyala S. (2005). The evolution of e-Commerce research: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6 (4), 262-281.
9. Constant D., Kiesler S. and Sproull L. (1994). What's mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research, 5 (4), 400-421.
10. Doherty N.F., Coombs C.R. and Loan-Clarke J. (2006). A re-conceptualization of the interpretive flexibility of information technologies: Redressing the balance between the social and the technical. European Journal of Information Systems, 15 (6), 569-582.
11. Eisenhardt K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532-550.
12. Haythornthwaite C. (2006). Articulating divides in distributed knowledge practice. Information, Communication & Society, 9 (6), 761-780.
13. Henderson J.C. and Venkatraman N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32 (1), 4-16.
14. Hevner A.R., March S.T., Park J. and Ram S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28 (1), 75-105.
15. Hargadon A. and Sutton R.I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (4), 716-749.
16. Iivari J. (2007). A paradigmatic analysis of Information Systems as a design science, forthcoming in Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems. Draft 27p, ask the newest version from the author juhani.iivari@oulu.fi.
17. Järvinen P. (2004). On research methods, Opinpajan kirja, Tampere, Finland.
18. Levitin A.V. and Redman T.C. (1998). Data as resource: Properties, implications, and prescriptions. Sloan Management Review, 40 (1), 89-101.
19. March S.T. and Smith G.F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15 (4), 251-266.
20. Markus M. L., Majchrzak A. and Gasser L. (2002). A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quarterly, 26 (3), 179-212.
21. Parberry I. (1989). A guide for new referees in theoretical computer science. SIGACT News, 20 (4), 92-109.
22. Reeves C.A. and Bednar D.A. (1994). Defining quality: Alternatives and implications. Academy of Management Review, 19 (3), 419-445.
23. Sahay S. and Robey D. (1996). Organizational context, social interpretation, and the implementation and consequences of geographic information systems. Accounting, Management and Information Technology, 6 (4), 255-282.
24. Smith A. J. (1990). The task of the referee. Computer, 23 (4), 65-71.
25. Van Aken J.E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41 (2), 219-246.
26. Van der Heijden H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695-704.