Combining perception, action, intention, and value: A control theoretic approach to driving performance

Handbook of Driving Simulation for Engineering, Medicine, and Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 43-1-43-16

  Flach, John M ^a   Jagacinski, Richard J ^b   Smith, Matthew R H ^c   McKenna, Brian P ^d  

^a WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c DELPHI CORPORATION   (United States)

^d Resilient Cognitive Solutions   (United States)

Author keywords

Abstraction Hierarchy; Control Theory; Observer; Optimal Control Model; Regulator Paradox; Stability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869402733     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
2. Bernstein, N. (1967). Coordination and regulation of movement. New York: Pergamon Press.
3. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
4. Caird, J. K., Chisholm, S. L., Edwards, C. J., & Creaser, J. I. (2007). The effect of yellow light onset time on older and younger drivers’ perception response time (PRT) and intersection behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 10, 383-396.
5. Caird, J. K., Willness, C. R., Steel, P., & Scialfa, C. (2008). A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(4), 1282-1293. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2008.01.009
6. Chisholm, S. L., Caird, J. K., & Lochhart, J. (2007). The effects of practice with MP3 players on driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(2), 704-713. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.09.014
7. Cochran, A., & Stobbs, J. (1968). The search for the perfect swing. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.
8. Denton, G. G. (1980). The influence of pattern on perceived speed. Perception, 9, 393-402.
9. Dingus, T. A., Klauer, S. G., Neale, V. L., Petersen, A., Lee, S. E., Sudweeks, J, Knipling, R. R. (2006). The 100-car naturalistic driving study: Phase II—Results of the 100-car field experiment (NHTSA DTNH22-00-C-07007). US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Retrieved from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/driver-distraction/PDF/100CarMain.pdf
10. Evans, L. (1991). Traffic safety and the driver. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
11. Fajen, B. R. (2005). Calibration, information, and control strategies for braking to avoid collision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 480-501.
12. Flach, J. M., Dekker, S., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Playing twenty questions with nature (The surprise version): Reflections on the dynamics of experience. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 9(2), 125-145.
13. Flach, J. M., Smith, M. R. H., Stanard, T., & Dittman, S. M. (2004). Collisions: Getting them under control. In H. Hecht & G. J. P. Salvelsbergh (Eds.), Time-to-contact. (pp. 67-91). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
14. Flach, J. M., & Warren, R. (1995). Low-altitude flight. In P. Hancock, J. Flach, J. Caird, & K. Vicente (Eds.), Local applications of the ecological approach to human-machine systems (pp. 65-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Gelb, A. (Ed.). (1974). Applied optimal estimation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and develop-ment. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
17. Gibson, J. J. (1958). Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. British Journal of Psychology, 49, 182-194.
18. Reprinted in Reed, E., & Jones, R. (Eds.). (1982). Reasons for Realism (pp. 148-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Gibson, J. J. (1963). The useful dimensions of sensitivity. American Psychologist, 18, 1-15.
20. Gibson, J. J. (1979/1984). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Gibson, J. J., & Crooks, L. E. (1938). A theoretical field-analysis of automobile driving. American Journal of Psychology, 51, 435-471. Reprinted in Reed, E., & Jones, R. (Eds.). (1982). Reasons for Realism (pp. 119-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Gibson, J. J., Olum, P., & Rosenblatt, F. (1955). Parallax and perspective during landings. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 372-385.
23. Hawthorne, C., Weiss, P., & Burks, A. (Eds.). (1931-1966). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. 8 volumes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Hecht, H., & Salvelsbergh, G. J. P. (Eds.). (2004). Time-to-contact. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
25. Jagacinski, R. J., & Flach, J. M. (2003). Control theory for humans. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Jagacinski, R. J., & Miller, R. A. (1978). Describing the human operator’s internal model of a dynamic system. Human Factors, 20, 425-433.
27. Juarrero, A. (2002). Dynamics in action. Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Kirk, D. E. (1970). Optimal control theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29. Kleinman, D. L., Baron, S., & Levison, W. H. (1971). A control theoretic approach to manned-vehicle systems analysis. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, AC-16, 824-832.
30. Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437-459.
31. Loomis, J. M., Da Silva, J. A., Fujita, N., & Fukusima, S. S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 906-921.
32. McKenna, B. P. (2004). Role of optical angle and expansion rate in a braking action. Unpublished Masters thesis. Wright State University, Dayton, OH.
33. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA). (2006). Traffic safety facts (Rep. DOT HS 810 623). Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation. Retrieved from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/810623.pdf
34. National Research Council. (1997). Aviation safety and pilot control: Understanding and preventing unfavorable pilot-vehicle interactions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35. Neisser, U. (1987). From direct perception to conceptual structure. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 11-24). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
36. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
37. Owen, D. H. (1984). Optical flow and texture variables useful in detecting decelerating and accelerating self-motion (AFRHL-TP-84-4, AD-1248 718). Williams Air Force Base, AZ: Operations Training Division, Air Force Research Laboratory.
38. Pew, R. W., & Baron, S. (1978). The components of an information processing theory of skilled performance based on an optimal control perspective. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction: An approach to cognitive engineering. New York: North-Holland.
40. Schmidt, R. A. (1989). Unintended acceleration: A review of human factors contributions. Human Factors, 31(3), 345-364.
41. Senders, J. (1964). The human operator as a monitor and controller of multidegree of freedom systems. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-5, 2-6.
42. Smith, M. R. H. (2002). Automotive collision avoidance system field operational test. Warning cue implementation summary report. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved from: http://www.itsdocs.fhwa.dot.gov//JPODOCS/REPTS_TE/13674.pdf
43. Smith, M. R. H., Bakowski, D. L., & Witt, G. J. (2007). The utilization of different testing venues for the evaluation of safety and acceptance in the SAVE-IT program. Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference North America. Iowa City, IA. Available from: http://www.dsc-na.org/
44. Smith, M. R. H., Flach, J. M., Dittman, S. M., & Stanard, T. (2001). Monocular optical constraints on collision control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception, and Performance, 27, 395-410.
45. Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychological Science, 12(6), 462-466.
46. Vicente, K. J. (1999). Cognitive work analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47. Warren, R. (1982). Optical transformation during movement: Review of the optical concomitants of egomotion (Final Tech. Rep. for Grant N. AFOSR-81-0108). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University. Also appears as Tech. Rep. AFOSR-TR-82-1028, Bolling Air Force Base, DC: Air Force Office of Scientific Research. (NTIS no. AD-A122 275).
48. Warren, R., & McMillan, G. R. (1984). Altitude control using action-demanding interactive displays: Toward an active psychophysics. Proceedings of the 1984 IMAGE III conference (pp. 37-51). Phoenix, AZ: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
49. Warren, R., & Wertheim, A. (Eds.). (1990). Perception & control of self-motion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Weinberg, G. M., & Weinberg, D. (1979). On the design of stable systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
51. Weiner, N. (1948). Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and machine. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.