Effects of augmented reality with functional electric stimulation on muscle strength, balance and gait of stroke patients

Journal of Physical Therapy Science

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 755-762

  Kim, In Chul ^a   Lee, Byoung Hee ^a  

^a Sahmyook University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; FES; Stroke

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869237900     PISSN: 09155287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1589/jpts.24.755     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Tong RK, Ng MF, Li LS: Effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer, with and without functional electric stimulation, in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2006, 87: 1298-1304. [Medline] [CrossRef]
2. Walker C, Brouwer BJ, Culham EG: Use of visual feedback in retraining balance following acute stroke. Phys Ther, 2000, 80: 886-895. [Medline]
3. Laufer Y: The effect of walking aids on balance and weight-bearing patterns of patients with hemiparesis in various stance positions. Phys Ther, 2003, 83: 112-122. [Medline]
4. Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J, et al.: Balance disability after stroke. Phys Ther, 2006, 86: 30-38. [Medline]
5. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, et al.: Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther, 1985, 65: 175-180. [Medline]
6. Daly JJ, Roenigk K, Holcomb J, et al.: A randomized controlled trial of functional neuromuscular stimulation in chronic stroke subjects. Stroke, 2006, 37: 172-178. [Medline] [CrossRef]
7. Kesar TM, Reisman DS, Perumal R, et al.: Combined effects of fast treadmill walking and functional electrical stimulation on post-stroke gait. Gait Posture, 2011, 33: 309-313. [Medline] [CrossRef]
8. Hesse S: Treadmill training with partial body weight support after stroke: A review. NeuroRehabilitation, 2008, 23: 55-65. [Medline]
9. Dunning K, Black K, Harrison A, et al.: Neuroprosthesis peroneal functional electrical stimulation in the acute inpatient rehabilitation setting: a case series. Phys Ther, 2009, 89: 499-506. [Medline] [CrossRef]
10. Mirelman A, Patritti BL, Bonato P, et al.: Effects of virtual reality training on gait biomechanics of individuals post-stroke. Gait Posture, 2010, 31: 433-437. [Medline] [CrossRef]
11. Schmidt H, Werner C, Bernhardt R, et al.: Gait rehabilitation machines based on programmable footplates. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2007, 4: 2 [CrossRef]. [Medline]
12. Teixeira da Cunha Filho I, Lim PA, Qureshy H, et al.: A comparison of regular rehabilitation and regular rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training for acute stroke patients. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2001, 38: 245-255. [Medline]
13. Hesse S, Uhlenbrock D, Sarkodie-Gyan T: Gait pattern of severely disabled hemiparetic subjects on a new controlled gait trainer as compared to assisted treadmill walking with partial body weight support. Clin Rehabil, 1999, 13: 401-410. [Medline] [CrossRef]
14. Yang YR, Tsai MP, Chuang TY, et al.: Virtual reality-based training improves community ambulation in individuals with stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Gait Posture, 2008, 28: 201-206. [Medline] [CrossRef]
15. Kim YW, Weon JH, Chung BI: Effects of functional electrical stimulation on gait patterns in stroke patient. Korean Acad Univ Trained Phys Ther, 2000, 7: 72-80.
16. Liston R, Mickelborough J, Harris B, et al.: Conventional physiotherapy and treadmill re-training for higher-level gait disorders in cerebrovascular disease. Age Ageing, 2000, 29: 311-318. [Medline] [CrossRef]
17. Shetler K, Marcus R, Froelicher VF, et al.: Heart rate recovery: Validation and methodologic issues. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001, 38: 1980-1987. [Medline] [CrossRef]
18. Reese NB: Muscle and Sensory Testing, 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier, 2005, pp535, 543-544.
19. Rydahl SJ, Brouwer BJ: Ankle stiffness and tissue compliance in stroke survivors: A validation of Myotonometer measurements. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2004, 85: 1631-1637. [Medline] [CrossRef]
20. Berg KO, Maki BE, Williams JI, et al.: Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1992, 73: 1073-1080. [Medline]
21. Muir SW, Berg K, Chesworth B, et al.: Use of the Berg Balance Scale for predicting multiple falls in community-dwelling elderly people: a prospective study. Phys Ther, 2008, 88: 449-459. [Medline] [CrossRef]
22. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S: The timed "Up & Go": A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1991, 39: 142-148. [Medline]
23. Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW: The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2005, 86: 1641-1647. [Medline] [CrossRef]
24. Verheyden G, Vereeck L, Truijen S, et al.: Trunk performance after stroke and the relationship with balance, gait and functional ability. Clin Rehabil, 2006, 20: 451-458. [Medline] [CrossRef]
25. Dunning K, Levine P, Schmitt L, et al.: An ankle to computer virtual reality system for improving gait and function in a person 9 months poststroke. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2008, 15: 602-610. [Medline] [CrossRef]
26. Mayer NH: Clinicophysiologic concepts of spasticity and motor dysfunction in adults with an upper motoneuron lesion. Muscle Nerve Suppl, 1997, 20: 1-14. [Medline] [CrossRef]
27. Kim SY: Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the myotonometer in the assessment of biceps brachii and quadriceps. Korean Acad Univ Trained Phys Ther, 2007, 14: 29-36.
28. Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Jensen R, et al.: Measurement of muscle hardness: A methodological study. Cephalalgia, 1998, 18: 106-111. [Medline] [CrossRef]
29. Nyberg L, Gustafson Y: Patient falls in stroke rehabilitation. A challenge to rehabilitation strategies. Stroke, 1995, 26: 838-842. [Medline] [CrossRef]
30. Bobath B: Adult Hemiplegia: Evaluation and Treatment, 3rd ed, London: William Heinemman Medial Books Ltd, 1990.
31. Jiang L, Dou ZL, Wen HM, et al.: Study of lower extremity muscle function in stroke patients by velocity-encoded phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2011, 91: 160-165. [Medline]
32. Walker ML, Ringleb SI, Maihafer GC, et al.: Virtual reality-enhanced partial body weight-supported treadmill training poststroke: Feasibility and effectiveness in 6 subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2010, 91: 115-122. [Medline] [CrossRef]
33. Mirelman A, Bonato P, Deutsch JE: Effects of training with a robot-virtual reality system compared with a robot alone on the gait of individuals after stroke. Stroke, 2009, 40: 169-174. [Medline] [CrossRef]
34. Daly JJ, Ruff RL: Feasibility of combining multi-channel functional neuromuscular stimulation with weight-supported treadmill training. J Neurol Sci, 2004, 225: 105-115. [Medline] [CrossRef]
35. Barbeau H, Visintin M: Optimal outcomes obtained with body-weight support combined with treadmill training in stroke subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2003, 84: 1458-1465. [Medline] [CrossRef]