Implementation of EHR-based strategies to improve outpatient CAD care

American Journal of Managed Care

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 603-610

  Persell, Stephen D ^a,b   Khandekar, Janardan ^c   Gavagan, Thomas ^d   Dolan, Nancy C ^a,b   Levi, Sue ^c   Kaiser, Darren ^b   Friesema, Elisha M ^a   Lee, Ji Young ^a   Baker, David W ^a,b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTHSHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTHSYSTEM   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; ANTILIPEMIC AGENT; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DYSLIPIDEMIA; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTPATIENT CARE; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; REIMBURSEMENT; REMINDER SYSTEM; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

ADRENERGIC BETA-ANTAGONISTS; ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS; ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME INHIBITORS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL-COA REDUCTASE INHIBITORS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; REIMBURSEMENT, INCENTIVE; REMINDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84869211072     PISSN: 10880224     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, Blumenthal D. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(3):464-471.
2. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):742-752. (Pubitemid 46780634)
3. Goldzweig CL, Towfigh A, Maglione M, Shekelle PG. Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2):w282-w293.
4. O'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Rush WA, et al. Impact of electronic health record clinical decision support on diabetes care: a randomized trial. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(1):12-21.
5. Linder JA, Ma J, Bates DW, Middleton B, Stafford RS. Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1400-1405. (Pubitemid 47052439)
6. Crosson JC, Ohman-Strickland PA, Hahn KA, et al. Electronic medical records and diabetes quality of care: results from a sample of family medicine practices. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(3):209-215. (Pubitemid 46889997)
7. Romano MJ, Stafford RS. Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(10):897-903.
8. Persell SD, Kaiser D, Dolan NC, et al. Changes in performance after implementation of a multifaceted electronic-health-record-based quality improvement system. Med Care. 2011;49(2):117-125.
9. American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American Medical Association-Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement. Clinical performance measures: chronic stable coronary artery disease. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2005.
10. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1974;19(6):716-723.
11. Trapletti A, Hornik K. tseries: Time Series Analysis and Computational Finance. R package version 0.10-18, 2009.
12. Jarque CM, Bera AK. Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters.1980;6(3):255- 259.
13. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality(complete samples). Biometrika. 1966;52(3/4):591-611.
14. Wilk MB, Gnanadesikan R. Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data. Biometrika. 1968;55(1):1-17.
15. Tierney WM, Overhage JM, Murray MD, et al. Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(12):967-976. (Pubitemid 38091390)
16. Sequist TD, Gandhi TK, Karson AS, et al. A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(4):431-437. (Pubitemid 40922904)
17. Eccles M, McColl E, Steen N, et al. Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2002;325(7370):941.
18. Demakis JG, Beauchamp C, Cull WL, et al. improving residents' compliance with standards of ambulatory care: results from the VA Cooperative Study on Computerized Reminders. JAMA. 2000;284(11):1411-1416.
19. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O'Brien MA, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006(2):CD000259.
20. Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, Daw C, Sookanan S. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(4):265-272. (Pubitemid 46768610)
21. Doran T, Kontopantelis E, Valderas JM, et al. Effect of financial incentives on incentivised and non-incentivised clinical activities: longitudinal analysis of data from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework. BMJ. 2011;342:d3590.
22. Drozda J Jr, Messer JV, Spertus J, et al. ACCF/AHA/AMA-PCPI 2011 Performance Measures for Adults With Coronary Artery Disease and Hypertension: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and the American Medical Association-Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement. Circulation. 2011;124(2):248-270.
23. Fraker T Jr, Fihn SD, Gibbons RJ, et al. 2007 chronic angina focused update of the ACC/AHA 2002 Guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Group to develop the focused update of the 2002 Guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina. Circulation. 2007;116(23):2762-2772. (Pubitemid 350291248)
24. Kmetik KS, O'Toole MF, Bossley H, et al. Exceptions to outpatient quality measures for coronary artery disease in electronic health records. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(4):227-234.
25. Persell SD, Dolan NC, Friesema EM, Thompson JA, Kaiser D, Baker DW. Frequency of inappropriate medical exceptions to quality measures. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(4):225-231.