Managing the current and future supply of ecosystem services in the Hungarian and Romanian Tisza River Basin

Regional Environmental Change

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 689-700

  Petz, Katalin ^a   Minca, Elena L ^a,b   Werners, Saskia E ^a   Leemans, Rik ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Nektarina Non Profit   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Environmental change; Flood management; Hungary; Romania; Tisza River Basin

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869201309     PISSN: 14363798     EISSN: 1436378X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-012-0284-7     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Badica P (2007) Interview with Roxana Bojariu. National Administration of Meteorology. Romania Libera. http://www. romanialibera. ro/.
2. Bellon T (2004) Living together with nature-farming on the river flats in the valley of the Tisza. Acta Etnographica Hungarica 49: 243-256.
3. Benedek P (2005) Pest-plant relations in the light of possible climate change. 'Agro-21' Brochures 43: 39-44.
4. Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12(12): 1394-1404.
5. Bihari Z, Lakatos M, Szalay S, Szentimrei T (2005) Some characteristics of the climate in Hungary since 1901. Hungarian Meteorological Service, Budapest.
6. Binning C, Cork S, Parry R, Shelton D (2001) Natural assets: an inventory of ecosystem goods and services in the Goulburn Broken catchment. CSIRO, Canberra.
7. Blujdea V (2005) Study regarding the observation of the impact of the climate change on the forests Annals of the Forest Research and Management Institute 48. Institute for Forest Research and Management, Bucharest.
8. Burkhard B, Kroll F, Müller F, Windhorst W (2009) Landscapes'capacities to provide ecosystem services-a concept for land-cover based assessments. Landsc Online 15: 1-22.
9. Chiriac D, Geicu A, Humǎ C, Bleahu A (2005) Socio-economic effects of drought on the quality of life of human communities in Romania. Calitatea vieţii 16: 1-20.
10. Ciulache S, Ionac N (1995) Atmospheric risk phenomena. Editura Ştiinţificǎ, Bucharest.
11. Crişuri Water Directorate (2006) Annual synthesis regarding water quality in the Crişuri watershed (Sinteza anualǎ privind calitatea apelor din bazinul hidrografic Crişuri). Crişuri Water Directorate, Oradea (Romania).
12. Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7(1): 21-28. doi: 10. 1890/080025.
13. De Groot R (2006) Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75(3-4): 175-186.
14. De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41(3): 393-408.
15. De Groot R, Fisher B, Christie M, Aronson J, Braat L, Haines-Young R, Gowdy J, Maltby E, Neuville A, Polasky S, Portela R, Ring I (2010a) Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. In: Kumar P (ed) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. Earthscan, London.
16. De Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L (2010b) Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complexity 7(3): 260-272.
17. Dimache G (2007) General presentation of the wet areas proposed for the sectors Tinca and Sudrigiu on the Crişul Negru River. National Institute of Research and Development for Environment Protection (ICIM), Bucharest.
18. EEA (2007) Climate change on water adaptation issues, vol 2. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen.
19. European INTERREG Neighbourhood Programme of Hungary and Ukraine (2006) Concept study. Development of a complex investment plan for flood control, water management and the revitalization of the "Borzsa and Bereg" river basin. FETIKÖVIZIG, RISSAC, Nyíregyháza-Uzhorod.
20. Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS (2004) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35: 557-581.
21. Government of Hungary (2007a) Environment and Energy Operational Programme, Budapest.
22. Government of Hungary (2007b) New Hungary Rural Development Programme, Budapest.
23. Government of Hungary (2007c) The North Great Plain Operational Programme, Budapest.
24. Government of Romania (2005) Standard form Natura 2000. Ministry of Environment ans Sustainable Development, Bucharest.
25. Government of Romania (2007a) National Rural Development Programme, Bucharest.
26. Government of Romania (2007b) Regional Operational Programme, Bucharest.
27. Government of Romania (2007c) Sectoral Operational Programme for Environment, Bucharest.
28. Groza A, Barbu R, Stanciu E, Hulea D, Banaduc D (2006) Natura 2000 in the new EU member states-one year after accession: status report for new and candidate member states (questionnaire Romania). Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development, WWF-Danube Carpathian Programme, Romanian Ornithological Society, Ecotur Sibiu NGO.
29. Guo ZW, Xiao XM, Li DM (2000) An assessment of ecosystem services: water flow regulation and hydroelectric power production. Ecol Appl 10(3): 925-936.
30. Guo Z, Xiao X, Gan Y, Zheng Y (2001) Ecosystem functions, services and their values-a case study in Xingshan County of China. Ecol Econ 38(1): 141-154.
31. Hein L (2010) Economics and ecosystems. Efficiency, sustainability and equity in ecosystem management. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham.
32. Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot RS, van Ierland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57(2): 209-228.
33. Hungarian Academy of Science (2006a) National effects of global climate change and answers to give-summary report. Ministry of Environment and Water, Budapest.
34. Hungarian Academy of Science (2006b) National effects of global climate change and answers to give-summary report (A globális klímaváltozással összefüggo{double acute} hazai hatások és erre adandó válaszok). Ministry of Environment and Water Budapest.
35. Hungarian Academy of Science (2007) Climate change and biodiversity-assessments for creating a scientific base for the adaptation strategy. Ministry of Environment and Water, Budapest.
36. Hungarian Meteorological Service, Eötvös Loránd University (2006) Climate scenarios for the national climate change strategy. Ministry of Environment and Water, Budapest.
37. Jolánkai G, Gulyás P, Németh J, and Kavrán V (2004) Ecological characterisation of the Tisza River and its oxbows, Annex 9. Water Resources Research Centre (VITUKI), Budapest.
38. Kosoy N, Martinez-Tuna M, Muradian R, Martinez-Alier J (2007) Payments for environmental services in watersheds: Insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America. Ecol Econ 61(2-3): 446-455.
39. Kremen C, Williams NM, Bugg RL, Fay GP, Thorp RW (2004) The area requirements of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California. Ecol Lett 7: 1109-1119.
40. Liu J, Li S, Ouyang Z, Tam C, Chen X (2008) Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(28): 9477-9482. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0706436105.
41. MA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis report. Island Press, Washington.
42. Minca EL, Petz K, Werners S (2008) An ecosystem services approach in the Tisza River Basin. Tiscia 36: 35-40.
43. Ministry of Water and Environment (2008) Hungarian national climate strategy. Ministry of Water and Environment, Hungary.
44. Molnár G, Karakai T, Kajner P (2007) Possible financing sources of the floodplain management between 2007-2013. European INTERREG Neighbourhood Programme of Hungary and Ukraine. Bokartisz, Environmental Management and Landscape Rehabilitation Public Utility Company of the Bodrogköz, Karcsa.
45. Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron D, Chan KMA, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw M (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7(1): 4-11. doi: 10. 1890/080023.
46. Niemeijer D, de Groot RS (2008) A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. Ecol Indic 8(1): 14-25. doi: 10. 1016/j. ecolind. 2006. 11. 012.
47. Peterson GD, Beard TD Jr, Beisner BE, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Cumming G, Dent CL, Havlicek TD (2003) Assessing future ecosystem services: a case study of the Northern Highlands Lake District, Wisconsin. Conserv Ecol 7(3): 1.
48. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(11): 5242-5247. doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0907284107.
49. Schröter D, Cramer W, Leemans R, Prentice IC, Araújo MB, Arnell NW, Bondeau A, Bugmann H, Carter TR, Gracia CA, de la Vega-Leinert AC, Erhard M, Ewert F, Glendining M, House JI, Kankaanpää S, Klein RJT, Lavorel S, Lindner M, Metzger MJ, Meyer J, Mitchell TD, Reginster I, Rounsevell M, Sabaté S, Sitch S, Smith B, Smith J, Smith P, Sykes MT, Thonicke K, Thuiller W, Tuck G, Zaehle S, Zierl B (2005) Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 310(5752): 1333-1337. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1115233.
50. Sheil D, Puri R, Wan M, Basuki I, Heist Mv, Liswanti N, Rukmiyati, Rachmatika I, Samsoedin I (2006) Recognizing Local People's Priorities for Tropical Forest Biodiversity. AMBIO J Hum Environ 35(1): 17-24. doi: 10. 1579/0044-7447-35. 1. 17.
51. Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (2003) The Tisza River Project - real-life scale integrated catchment models for supporting water- and environmental management decisions. Budapest, Hungary. EVK1-CT-2001-00099.
52. Stancioiu PT, Abrudan IV, Dutca I (2010) The Natura 2000 Ecological network and forests in Romania: implications on management and administration. Int For Rev 12(1): 106-113.
53. Szász G (2005) The variability of climate and the yield variation of field crops. 'Agro-21' Brochures 38: 59-77.
54. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo MB, Sykes MT, Prentice IC (2005) Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102(23): 8245-8250.
55. Turner RK, van den Bergh JCJM, Soderqvist T, Barendregt A, van der Straaten J, Maltby E, van Ierlan EC (2000) Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecol Econ 36: 7-21.
56. Upper-Tisza Environment and Water Authority (2007) Gulács-Jánd protected areas report. FETIKOVIZIG, Nyíregyháza.
57. Vermes L (2006) The national drought strategy. 'Agro-21' Brochures 48: 30-33.
58. Werners SE, Flachner Z, Matczak P, Falaleeva M, Leemans R (2009) Exploring earth system governance: a case study of floodplain management along the Tisza river in Hungary. Glob Environ Change 19(4): 503-511.
59. Willemen L, Hein L, Verburg PH (2010) Evaluating the impact of regional development policies on future landscape services. Ecol Econ 69(11): 2244-2254.
60. World Resources Institute, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Environment Programme, World Bank (2000) World resources 2000-2001: people and ecosystems-the fraying web of life. WRI, Washington.