The impact of US biofuel policies on agricultural price levels and volatility

China Agricultural Economic Review

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 407-426

  Babcock, Bruce A ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agricultural commodity price; Agriculture; Biofuel policies; Process; United States of America

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84869178597     PISSN: 1756137X     EISSN: 17561388     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17561371211284786     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Babcock, B.A., Barr, K. and Carriquiry, M. (2010), “Costs and benefits to taxpayers, consumers, and producers from US ethanol policies”, Staff Report 10-SR-106, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
2. FAPRI (2009), “Impacts of selected US ethanol policy options”, FAPRI-MU Report No. 04-09, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
3. Salvo, A. and Huse, C. (2011), “Consumer choice between gasoline and sugarcane ethanol”, working paper, Northwestern University and Stockholm School of Economics, February.
4. Eidman, V. (2007), “Ethanol economics of dry mill plants”, Corn-based Ethanol in Illinois and the US: A Report from the Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Chapter 3, available at: www.farmdoc.illinois.edu.
5. Gardner, B. (2007), “Fuel ethanol subsidies and farm price support”, Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, Vol. 5 No. 2 (article 4 ).