Dictating and editing short texts while driving: Distraction and task completion

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 13-20

  Cuřín, Jan ^a   Labský, Martin ^a   Macek, Tomáš ^a   Kleindienst, Jan ^a   Young, Hoi ^b   Thyme Gobbel, Ann ^b   Quast, Holger ^b   König, Lars ^b  

^a Voice Technologies and Systems   (Czech Republic)

^b NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAR SIMULATOR; CELL PHONE; DRIVER DISTRACTIONS; EYE-GAZE; LANE CHANGE; MULTI-MODAL; SEMANTIC INFORMATION; SUBJECTIVE FEEDBACK; TEXT MESSAGES; TEXT TO SPEECH; TEXTING;

AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; CELLULAR TELEPHONES; MOBILE PHONES; SURVEYS; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT; TELEPHONE SYSTEMS;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 84869175034     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2381416.2381418     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Barón, A., Green, P.: Safety and Usability of Speech Interfaces for In-Vehicle Tasks while Driving: A Brief Literature Review. Technical Report UMTRI-2006-5. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 2006.
2. Brooke, J.: SUS: a "quick and dirty" usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & A. L. McClelland. Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis, 1996.
3. Bruyas, M.P., Brusque, C., Auriault, A., Tattegrain, H., Aillerie, I., Duraz, M.: Impairment of Lane Change Performance due to Distraction: Effect of Experimental Contexts. Proc. European Conf. on Human Centered Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, 2008.
4. Harbluk, J.L., Mitroi, J.S., Burns, P.C.: Three Navigation Systems with Three Tasks: Using the Lane-change test to Assess Distraction Demand. Proc. 5th Intl. Driving Symp. on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 2009.
5. Hart, S., Staveland, L.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload, pp. 139-183. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1988.
6. Hosking, S., Young, K., Regan, M.: The effects of text messaging on young novice driver performance. In: I. J. Faulks et al. (Eds.) Distracted driving, pp. 155-187. NSW: Australasian College of Road Safety, 2007.
7. Jamson, AH., Westerman, SJ., Hockey, GR., Carsten, OM.: Speech-based E-mail and driver behavior: effects of an invehicle message system interface. Hum Factors. 2004 Winter; 46(4): 625-39. (Pubitemid 40179360)
8. Ju, Y.C., Paek, T.: A Voice Search Approach to Replying to SMS Messages in Automobiles. International Speech Communication Association, 2009.
9. Labsky, M., Macek, T., Kleindienst, J., Quast, H., Couvreur, C.: In-car Dictation and Driver's Distraction: a Case Study. In: J. Jacko (Ed.) Human-Computer Interaction. Towards Mobile and Intelligent Interaction Environments, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 6763/2011, pp. 418- 425, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2011.
10. Mattes, S.: The Lane-Change-Task as a Tool for Driver Distraction Evaluation. Proc. Annual Spring Conference of the GFA/ISOES 2003.
11. Medenica, Z., Kun, A.: Comparing the Influence of Two User Interfaces for Mobile Radios on Driving Performance, Proceedings of the 4th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Stevenson, Washington, July 9-12, 2007.
12. Petzoldt, T., Bär, N., Krems, J.F.: Gender Effects on Lane Change Test Performance. Proc. 5th Intl. Driving Symp. on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 2009.
13. Ranney, T.A. et al.: Measuring Distraction Potential of Operating In-Vehicle Devices. Technical Report DOT HS 811 231. U.S. Dept. of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Dec. 2009.
14. Sauro, J.: Measuring Usability with the System Usability Scale, http://www.measuringusability.com/sus.php, 2011.
15. Shelton, L.: Statement before the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, U.S. House of Representatives, May 9, 2001. http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/nhtsa/announce/testimony/ distractiontestimony.html.
16. Stutts, J., Reinfurt, D., Staplin, L., Rodgman, E.: The Role of Driver Distraction in Trafic Crashes, May 2001. http://www.aaafoundation.org/pdf/ distraction.pdf.
17. Suhm, B., Myers, B., Waibel, A.: Multimodal error correction for speech user interfaces. Proc. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 2001.
18. Oviatt, S. et al.: Designing the user interface for multimodal speech and pen-based gesture applications: State-of-the-art systems and future research directions. HCI, Vol. 15 (4), p.263-322, 2000. (Pubitemid 32371462)
19. Vertanen, K.: Speech and Speech Recognition during Dictation Corrections. Proc. Interspeech 2006.
20. Young, K.L., Regan, M., Hammer, M.: Driver Distraction: A Review of the Literature. Monash University Accident Research Centre. Report no. 206, 2003.
21. Wang, Y., Chen, Ch., Cao, J., Zhang W.: Measurement of Degradation Effects of Mobile Phone Use on Driving Performance with Driving Simulation, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Chinese Logistics and Transportation Professionals, 2008.