EPA's drinking water standards and the shaping of sound science

Shaping Science and Technology Policy: The Next Generation of Research

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 102-123

  Franklin, Pamela M ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869158875     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Bazelon, D. L. 1997. Coping with Technology Through the Legal Process. Cornell Law Review 62: 817.
2. Butterworth, B. E., G. L. Kedderis, and R. Conolly. 1998. The Chloroform Cancer Risk Assessment: A Mirror of Scientific Understanding. CIIT Activities 18 (4): 1-9. April.
3. Chubin, D. E., and E. J. Hackett. 1990. Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
4. Coglianese, C. 1996. Litigating within Relationships: Disputes and Disturbance in the Regulatory Process. Law & Society Review 30 (4): 735-65.
5. Cotruvo, J. A., and C. D. Vogt. 1985. Regulatory Aspects of Disinfection. Water Chlorination: Environmental Impact and Health Effects. R. L. Jolley et al., eds. Ann Arbor, MI: Lewis Publishers, 91-96.
6. Dunnick, J. K., and R. L. Melnick. 1993. Assessment of the Carcinogenic Potential of Chlorinated Water: Experimental Studies of Chlorine, Chloramine, and Trihalomethanes. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 85: 817-22.
7. Evans, A. S. 1976. Causation and Disease: The Henle-Koch postulates revisited. Yale Journal of Biology & Medicine 49: 175-95.
8. Foster, K. R., D. E. Bernstein, and P. W. Huber, ed. 1999. Phantom Risk: Scientific Inference and the Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Franklin, P. M. 2002. Is All Research Created Equal? Institutional credibility and technical expertise in environmental policymaking. PhD diss., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Energy and Resources Group.
10. Gieryn, T. F. 1983. Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Interests of Scientists. American Sociological Review 48: 781-95.
11. Gieryn, T. F. 1995. Boundaries of Science. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. S. Jasanoff et al. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 393-43.
12. Gieryn, T. F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
13. Guston, D. H. 1999. Stabilizing the Boundary between U.S. Politics and Science:The Role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a Boundary Organization. Social Studies of Science 29 (1): 87-111.
14. Guston, D. H., and K. Keniston. 1994. Introduction: The Social Contract for Science. The Fragile Contract: University Science and the Federal Government. D. H. Guston and K. Keniston, eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1-41.
15. Herrick, C., and D. Jamieson. 1995. The Social Construction of Acid Rain. Global Environmental Change 5 (2): 105-12.
16. ILSI. 1997. An Evaluation of EPA's Proposed Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment Using Chloroform and Dichloroacetate as Case Studies: Report of an Expert Panel. Washington, DC: International Life Sciences Institute, Health and Environmental Sciences Institute.
17. ILSI. 1998. The Toxicity and Risk Assessment of Complex Mixtures in Drinking Water. Washington, DC: ILSI Risk Science Institute.
18. ILSI. Risk Science Institute and Environmental Protection Agency. 1993. Report of the Panel on Reproductive Effects of Disinfection Byproducts in Drinking Water. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA Health Effects Research Laboratory, ILSI Risk Science Institute.
19. Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
20. Jasanoff, S. 1992. Science, Politics, and the Renegotiation of Expertise at EPA. OSIRIS: 195-217.
21. Jasanoff, S. 1995. Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
22. Kagan, R. A. 2001. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
23. Keller, A. C. 2001. Good Science, Green Policy: The Role of Scientists in Environmental Policy in the United States. PhD diss. Univ. of California, Berkeley, Department of Political Science.
24. Kerwin, C. M. 1994. Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
25. Kerwin, C. M., and S. R. Furlong. 1992. Time and Rulemaking: An Empirical Test of Theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2 (2):113-38.
26. Kyle, A. D., D. Wallinga, and E. D. Olson. 1998. Comments of the Natural Resources Defense Council on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Notice of Data Availability & Request for Comments: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Notice of Data Availability. Natural Resources Defense Council. OW-Docket #MC-4101. Washington, DC. June 9, 1998.
27. Landy, M. K., M. J. Roberts, and S. R. Thomas. 1994. The Environmental Protection Agency: Asking the Wrong Questions from Nixon to Clinton. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
28. Latour, B. 1986. Science in Action. London: Open Univ. Press.
29. Leventhal, H. 1974. Environmental Decisionmaking and the Role of the Courts. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 122: 509-55.
30. McSpadden, L. 1997. Environmental Policy in the Courts. Environmental Policy in the 1990s. N. J. Vig and M. E. Kraft, eds. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 168-85.
31. Melnick, R., National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences. 1998. Letter to EPA Office of Water Docket Commenting on March 1998 NODA. 27 April.
32. Melnick, R., M. Kohn, J. K. Dunnick, and J. R. Leininger. 1998. Regenerative Hyperplasia Is Not Required for Liver Tumor Induction in Female B6C3F1 Mice Exposed to Trihalomethanes. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 148: 137-47.
33. Merton, R. K. 1942. Science and Technology in a Democratic Order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 1: 115-26.
34. Morris, R. D., A.-M. Audet, I. F. Angelillo, T. C. Chalmers, and F. Mosteller. 1992. Chlorination, Chlorination By-Products, and Cancer: A Metaanalysis. American Journal of Public Health 82 (7): 955-63.
35. National Institutes of Health. 1998. Report on Carcinogens, 11th Edition. Chloroform CAS No. 67-66-3. Available at ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/ eleventh/profiles/s038chlo.pdf.
36. Nelkin, D. 1994. The Public Face of Science: What can we learn from disputes? The Fragile Contract: University Science and the Federal Government. D. H. Guston and K. Keniston, eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 101-17.
37. O'Leary, R. 1993. Environmental Change: Federal Courts and the EPA. Philadelphia:Temple Univ. Press.
38. Olson, E. D., D. Wallinga, and G. Solomon. 1998. Comments of the Natural Resources Defense Council on the EPA "Notice of Data Availability" for the "National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts." OW Docket MC-4101. 30 April 1998.
39. Ozawa, C.P. 1996. Science in Environmental Conflicts. Sociological Perspectives 29 (2): 219-30.
40. Ozonoff, D. 1998. The Uses and Misuses of Skepticism: Epidemiology and Its Critics. Public Health Reports 113: 321-23. July-August 1998.
41. Powell, M. R. 1999. Science at EPA: Information in the Regulatory Process. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
42. Sarewitz, D. 1996. Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of Progress. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.
43. Science Advisory Board. 1999. An SAB Report: Review of the Peer Review Program of the Environmental Protection Agency. Research Strategies Advisory Committee of the Science Advisory Board. EPA-SAB-RSAC-00-002. Washington, DC. November.
44. Science Advisory Board. 1999. Review of the Draft Chloroform Risk Assessment and Related Issues in the Proposed Cancer Risk Assessment Guidelines. EPA-SAB-EC-LTR-00-001. Washington DC. 15 December.
45. Science Advisory Board. 2000. Review of the EPA's Draft Chloroform Risk Assessment. EPA-SAB-EC-00-009. Washington, D.C. April.
46. Smith, B. L. R. 1992. The Advisers: Scientists in the Policy Process. Washington, DC:The Brookings Institution.
47. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1986. Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. Federal Register 51 (185): 33992-4003.
48. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1994. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Proposed Rule. Federal Register 59(145): 38668-829. 29 July.
49. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1994. Workshop Report and Recommendations for Conducting Epidemiologic Research on Cancer and Exposure to Chlorinated Drinking Water. Washington, DC. 19-21 July 1994.
50. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1996. Proposed Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. Federal Register 61 (79): 17960-8011.
51. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1997. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Notice of Data Availability. Federal Register 62 (212):59387-484. 3 November.
52. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1997. Research Plan for Microbial Pathogens and Disinfection By-Products in Drinking Water. US EPA, Office of Research and Development. EPA 600-R-97-122. Washington, DC. December.
53. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Final Rule. Federal Register 63 (241): 69390-475. 16 December.
54. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Notice of Data Availability. Federal Register 63 (61):15674-92. 31 March.
55. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. Health Risk Assessment / Characterization of the Drinking Water Disinfection Byproduct Chloroform. Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water. PB99-111346. Washington, DC. 4 November.
56. Woolf, P. 1994. Integrity and Accountability in Research. The Fragile Contract:University Science and the Federal Government. D. H. Guston and K. Keniston, eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 59-81.