Combining rigor and relevance: The open electronic archive option

ACIS 2007 Proceedings - 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 152-162

  Whitworth, Brian ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Electronic archive; Electronic publication; IS future; Knowledge exchange system

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY DESIGN; CUTTING EDGES; ELECTRONIC ARCHIVES; ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION; ERRORS OF COMMISSIONS; GOOD RESEARCH; IS FUTURE; KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE; MULTIPLAYER GAMES; ONLINE AUCTIONS; REPUTATION RATING; RISK AVERSE; TWO-DIMENSION; USER SPACES;

ERRORS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RESEARCH; REVIEWS;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84869134457     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Barnes, S. J. (2005). Assessing the value of IS journals. Communications of the ACM, 48(1), 110-112.
2. Berners-Lee, T. (2000). Weaving The Web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the world wide web. New York: Harper-Collins.
3. Bowman, C. W. (2005). Intangibles Exploring the Full Depth of Issues. Sarnia, Ontario, Canada: Grafiks Marketing & Communication.
4. Brown, I. (2002). Individual and technological factors affecting perceived ease of use of web-based learning technologies in a developing country. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 9(5), 1-15.
5. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 11, 354-366.
6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, Sep.
7. Desouza, K. C., El-Sawy, O. A., Galliers, R. D., Loebbecke, C., & Watson, R. T. (2006). Beyond Rigor and Relevance towards responsibility and reverberation: Information systems research that really matters. Communications of the AIS, 17, 341-353.
8. Gell-mann, M. (1994). The quark and the jaguar. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
9. Golden, L., & Figart, D. M. (Eds.). (2000). Working Time: International Trends, Theory and Policy Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.
10. Grudin, J. (2004). Crossing the divide. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 11(1), 1-25.
11. Grudin, J. (2005). Human Factors, CHI and MIS. In P. Zhang & D. Galletta (Eds.), Advances in Management Information Systems (Vol. 4): M.E. Sharpe.
12. Gutek, B. A. (1990). Work group structure and information technology: A structural contingency approach. In J. Galegher, R. Kraut & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technical Foundations of Cooperative Work (pp. 63-78). Hillsdale NJ: L Erlbaum Assoc.
13. Heijden, H. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in the The Netherlands. Information & Management, 40, 541-549.
14. Horvitz, E. (2004). Lumiere Project: Bayesian Reasoning for Automated Assistance. http://reserach.microsoft.com/~horvitz/lum.htm
15. Hovav, A., & Gray, P. (2004). Managing academic e-journals. Communications of the ACM, 47(4), 79-82.
16. Katerattanakul, P., Han, B., & Hong, S. (2003). Objective qulaity ranking of computing journals. Communications of the ACM, 46(10), 111-114.
17. Kozar, K. A., Larsen, K. R., & Straub, D. W. (2006). Leveling the playing field: A comparative analysis of business school journal productivity. Communications of Association for Information Systems, 17, 524-538.
18. Laughlin, R. B. (2005). A Different Universe: Reinventing physics from the bottom down. New York: Basic Books.
19. Lee, A. S. (1999). Rigor and relevance in MIS research: beyond the approach of positivism alone. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 29-34.
20. Levitt, J. (2001). Internet Zone: Good help is hard to find. 2004, http://www.informatonweek.com/835/35uwjl.htm
21. Mahinda, E., & Whitworth, B. (2005, August 11-14). The Web of System Performance: Extending the TAM Model. Paper presented at AMCIS (Americas Conference on Information Systems) August 11-14, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
22. Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38, 217-230.
23. Mylonopoulos, N. A., & Theoharakis, V. (2001). Global perceptions of IS journals. Comms of the ACM, 44(9), 29-33.
24. Nerur, S., Sikora, R., Magalaraj, G., & Balijepally, V. (2005). Assessing the relative influence of journals in a citation network. Communicatioins of the ACM, 48 November(11), 71-74.
25. Ong, C., Lai, J., & Wang, Y. (2004). Factors affecting engineer's acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Information & Management, 41, 795-804.
26. Paul, R. (2005). Editor's View: an opportunity for editors of IS journals to relate their experiences and offer advice, the Editorial view of Ray J. Paul. First in a series. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 207-212.
27. PC Magazine. (2001). 20th Anniv. of the PC Survey Results. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,57454,00.asp
28. Pratley, C. (2004). Chris Pratley One Note WebLog http://weblogs.asp.net/chris_pratley/archive/2004/05/05/126888.aspx
29. Rainer, R. K., & Miller, M. D. (2005). Examining differences across journal rankings. Communications of the ACM, 48(2), 91-94.
30. Raymond, E. S. (1997). The Cathedral and the Bazaar. http://tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/.
31. Saunders, C. S. (2005). Between a Rock and a Hard Spot. MISQ, 29(4), iii-xii.
32. Schor, J. B. (1991). The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic Books.
33. Shih, H. (2004). An empirical study on predicting user acceptance of e-shopping on the Web. Information & Management, 41, 351-368.
34. Smith, H. A., Kulatilaka, N., & Venkatramen, N. (2002). Developments in IS practice III: Riding the wave: extracting value from mobile technology. Communications of Association of Information Systems, 8, 467-481.
35. Smolin, L. (2001). Three Roads to Quantum Gravity. New York: Basic Books.
36. Snodgrass, R. (2003). Journal Relevance. SIGMOD Record, 32(3), 11-15.
37. Szajna, B. (1994). How much is information systems research addressing key practitioner concerns? Database, May, 49-59.
38. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570.
39. Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave.
40. Valacich, J. S., Fuller, M. A., Schneider, C., & Dennis, A. R. (2006). Publication opportunities in permier business outlets: How level is the playing field? Information Systems Research, 17(2), 107-125.
41. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139.
42. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
43. Whitworth, B. (2005). Polite Computing. Behaviour & Information Technology, (5, September, http://brianwhitworth.com/polite05.pdf), 353-363.
44. Whitworth, B., & deMoor, A. (2003). Legitimate by design: Towards trusted virtual community environments. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(1), 31-51.
45. Yu, J., Ha, I.M.C., & Rho, J. (2005). Extending the TAM for a t-commerce. Information & Management, In Press.