The valuation of biodiversity conservation by the South African Khomani San "bushmen" community

Ecological Economics

Volumn 84, Issue , 2012, Pages 7-14

  Dikgang, Johane ^a   Muchapondwa, Edwin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Contingent valuation; Khomani San; Land restitution

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL WORKER; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; LAND TENURE; VALUATION;

KGALAGADI TRANSFRONTIER PARK;

EID: 84869117493     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.001     Document Type: Short Survey

References (37)

1. Arrow K., Solow R., Portney P.R., Leamer E.E., Radner R., Schuman H. Advance notice of proposed rulemaking, extension of comment period and release of contingent valuation methodology report. Federal Register 1993, 58:4601-4614.
2. Barnard A. Hunters and Herders of Southern Africa: A Comparative Ethnography of the Khoisan Peoples 1992, Cambridge University Press, New York; Cambridge.
3. Bosch D., Hirschfeld E. The !Ae!Hai Heritage Park bundle -including the agreement whereby the land claims of the Khomani San community and the Mier community are finalized and associated documents 2002, Commission on the Restitution of Land Rights, Pretoria.
4. Callicott J.B. On the intrinsic value of nonhuman species. The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity 1986, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. B.G. Norton (Ed.).
5. Capps O., Cramer R.A. Analysis of food stamp participation using qualitative choice models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1985, 67:49-59.
6. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) Introduction. Economics, Trade and Incentive Measures Accessed February 2, 2010. http://www.cbd.int/default.shtml.
7. Clinch J.P., Murphy A. Modelling winners and losers in contingent valuation of public goods: appropriate welfare measures and econometric analysis. The Economic Journal 2001, 111:420-443.
8. Clough P. Encouraging private biodiversity-incentives for biodiversity conservation on private land. Treasury Working Paper 00/25 2000, New Zealand Treasury, Nzier.
9. De Villiers B. Land Claims and National Parks: The Makuleke Experience 1999, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria.
10. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Land degradation Accessed April 18, 2010. http://soer.deat.gov.za/283.html.
11. Emerton, L., 2000. Using Economic Incentives for Biodiversity Conservation, a Mimeograph, the World Conservation Union, Gland.
12. Emerton L. Community-Based Incentives for Nature Conservation. IUCN-The World Conservation Union Eastern Africa Regional Office and Economics Unit Accessed April 29, 2009. http://economics.iucn.org.
13. Hall-Martin A., Carruthers J. South African National Parks: A Celebration 2003, SANParks, Johannesburg.
14. Hanley N., Splash C.L. Valuing Environmental Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method 1993, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Great Britain.
15. Hanley N., Colombo S., Kriström B., Watson F. Accounting for negative, zero and positive willingness to pay for landscape change in a national park. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2008, 60:1-16.
16. Hansen A.J., DeFries R. Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands. Ecological Applications 2007, 17:974-988.
17. Hartley P. Conservation Strategies for New Zealand 1997, New Zealand Business Roundtable, Wellington.
18. Hicks J.R. The foundations of welfare economics. The Economic Journal 1939, 49(196):696-715.
19. Hicks John R. The four consumer's surpluses. Review of Economic Studies 1943, XI:31-41.
20. Kneebone J. Biodiversity and Private Land 2000, Ministry for the Environment, Wellington.
21. Kneebone J., Lindsay J.R., Prime K., Christensen M. Bio-what? 2000, Ministry for the Environment, Wellington.
22. Knowler D. Incentive systems for natural resources management: the role of indirect incentives. FAO Rome. Report No. 99/023 IFAD-RAF 1999.
23. Köhlin G. Contingent valuation in project planning and evaluation: the case of social forestry in Orissa, India. Environment and Development Economics 1995, 6:237-258.
24. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis 2005, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
25. Mitchell R.C., Carson R.T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method 1989, Resources for the Future, Washington DC.
26. Muchapondwa E., Carlsson F., Köhlin G. Wildlife management in Zimbabwe: evidence from a contingent valuation study. South African Journal of Economics December 2008, 76:4.
27. Munro A. When is some number really better than no number? On the optimal choice between non-market valuation methods. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper: 8978 2007, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, Japan.
28. Norton D.A. Conservation biology and private land: shifting the focus. Conservation Biology 2000, 14:1221-1223.
29. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) OECD Environment & Sustainable Development, Handbook of Incentive Measures for Biodiversity: Design and Implementation 1999, OECD Publishing, Paris.
30. Reid H., Fig D., Magome H., Leader-Williams N. Co-management of contractual national parks in South Africa: lessons from Australia. Conservation and Society 2004, 2:377-409.
31. SANParks Where is the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park Accessed January 16, 2012. http://www.sanparks.org/conservation/transfrontier/kgalagadi.php.
32. Seymour C. Kgalagadi xeric savanna. Peer review in process 2001.
33. Shogren J.F., Shin S.Y., Hayes D.J., Kliebenstein J.B. Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept. The American Economic Review 1994, 84(1):255-270.
34. Swatuk L.A. Peace parks in Southern Africa Accessed March 25, 2009. http://wilsoncenter.org/events/docs/swatuk.pdf.
35. Vorhies, F., 2010. Environmental economics explained: how economic valuation can help pay for conservation. Unpublished.
36. WCMC (World Conservation Monitoring Centre) Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth's Living Resources 1992, Chapman and Hall, London.
37. Wynberg R., Kepe T. Land Reform and Conservation Areas in South Africa: Towards a Mutually Beneficial Approach 1999, IUCN, Johannesburg.