Mobile technology and naturalistic study designs in addiction research

Current Drug Abuse Reviews

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 169-171

  Verster, Joris C ^a   Tiplady, Brian ^b   Mckinney, Adele ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COGNITION; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG USE; EDITORIAL; HANGOVER; HUMAN; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; MOBILE PHONE; NATURALISTIC INQUIRY; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STUDY DESIGN; ADDICTION; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC);

CELLULAR PHONE; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTERNET; RESEARCH DESIGN; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 84869097956     PISSN: 18744737     EISSN: 18744745     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/1874473711205030169     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. McKinney A, Coyle K. Next day effects of a normal night's drinking on memory and psychomotor performance. Alcohol Alcohol 2004; 39: 509-13.
2. McKinney A, Coyle K. Alcohol hangover effects on measure of affect the morning after a normal night's drinking. Alcohol Alcohol 2006; 41: 54-60.
3. Prat G, Adan A, Sanchez-Turet M. Neurocognitive effects of alcohol hangover. Addic Behav 2009; 33 (1): 15-23.
4. Verster JC, Stephens R, Penning R, et al. On behalf of the Alcohol Hangover Research Group. The Alcohol Hangover Research Group consensus statement on best practice in alcohol hangover research. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 2010; 3 (2): 116-27.
5. Rohsenow DJ, Howland J, Arned JT, et al. Intoxication with bourbon versus vodka: Effects on hangover, sleep and next-day neurocognitive performance in young adults. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res 2010; 34 (3): 509-18.
6. Tiplady B, Oshinowo B, Thomson J, Drummond GB. Alcohol and cognitive function: assessment in everyday life and laboratory settings using mobile phones, alcoholism. Clin Exp Res 2009; 33: 2094-102.
7. Tiplady B. The use of a mobile phone to administer a cognitive task. Proc Br Psychol Soc 2005; 13: 25.
8. Tiplady B, Amati F, Dunn C, Drummond G. Alcohol and Memory: A selective reminding word-number test administered on a mobile phone. J Psychopharmacol 2009; 23: A72-A72.
9. Kennedy DO, Veasey RC, Watson AW, et al. Vitamins and psychological functioning: a mobile phone assessment of the effects of a B vitamin complex, vitamin C and minerals on cognitive performance and subjective mood and energy. Hum Psychopharmacol 2011; 26: 338-47.
10. Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 2008; 4: 1-32.
11. Waters A, Marhe R, Franken I. Attentional bias to drug cues is elevated before and during temptations to use heroin and cocaine. Psychopharmacology 201; 219: 909-21.
12. Tiplady B, Armstrong TC, Goulbourne MIW, Wright P. A field study of the effects of ethanol on human performance and mood. J Psychopharmacol 2006, 20: A49.
13. Scholey AB, Benson S, Owen L, Tiplady B. Neurocognitive and mood effects of alcohol in a naturalistic setting. Hum Psychopharmacol 201; 27: 514-6.
14. Parrott AC, Lasky J. Ecstasy (MDMA) effects on mood and cognition: before, during and after a Saturday night dance. Psychopharmacology 1998; 139: 261-8.
15. Degia A, Meadows R, Johnsen S, Dixon P, Hindmarch I, Boyle J. Investigation into the suitability of a portable psychometric device to be used in the field: an illicit drugs field investigation. J Clin Forensic Med 2006; 13: 242-6.
16. Cucciare MA, Weingardt KR, Green CJ, Hoffman J. Current trends in using internet and mobile technology to support treatment of substance use disorders. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 2012; 5 (3): 172-7.