On the propagation of statistical model parameter uncertainty in CFD calculations

Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 435-457

  Barth, Timothy ^a  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; Finite volume methods; Uncertainty quantification

Indexed keywords

BURGERS EQUATIONS; CFD CODES; DISCRETIZATIONS; FINITE-VOLUME; HIGH-ORDER; MODEL PARAMETERS; MULTIPLE SOURCE; NONLINEAR CONSERVATION LAW; NUMERICAL RESULTS; REYNOLDS AVERAGED NAVIER-STOKES EQUATION; STATISTICAL MODELS; UNCERTAIN BOUNDARIES; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATIONS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TURBULENCE MODELS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL MODEL; REYNOLDS NUMBER; STOCHASTICITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84869088124     PISSN: 09354964     EISSN: 14322250     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00162-011-0221-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Askey, R., Wilson, J.: Some basic hypergeometric polynomials that generalize Jacobi polynomials. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 54, 1-"55 (1985)
2. Babuska, I., Nobile, F., Tempone, R.: A stochastic collocation method for elliptic partial differential equations with random input data. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 45(2), 1005-"1034 (2007)
3. Babuska, I., Tempone, R., Zouraris, G.: Galerkin finite element approximations of stochastic elliptic partial differential equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 42(2), 800-"825 (2004) (Pubitemid 40645215)
4. Baldwin, B.S., Barth, T.J.: A One-Equation Turbulence Transport Model for High Reynolds NumberWall-Bounded Flows. Technical Report TM-102847, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field (1990)
5. Barth, T., Chan, T., Tang, W.P.: Parallel domain decomposition preconditioning for computational fluid dynamics. In: De Palma et al. (eds.) VEC '98, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1573. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
6. Barth, T.J., Ohlberger, M. : Finite volume methods: Foundation and analysis. In: Stein, E., de Borst, R., Hughes, T. Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, vol. 1, pp. 439-"473. Wiley, Chichester (2004)
7. Deb, M., Babuska, I., Oden, J.: Solution of stochastic partial differential equations using Galerkin finite element techniques. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 190, 6359-"6372 (2001) (Pubitemid 32984202)
8. Ghamen, R., Spanos, P.: Stochastic Finite Elements. Dover, Mineola (1991)
9. Godlewski, E., Raviart, P.A.: Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. Mathematiques & Applications. Ellipses, Paris (1991)
10. Godunov, S.K.: A finite difference method for the numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics. Mat. Sb. 47, 271-"290 (1959)
11. Gottlieb, D., Hesthaven, J.: Spectral methods for hyperbolic problems. J. Comp. Appl. Math. 128, 83-"181 (2001)
12. Harris, C.: Two-Dimensional Aerodynamic Characteristics of the NACA 0012 Airfoil in the Langley 8-Foot Transonic Pressure Tunnel. Technical Report TM-81927, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton (1981)
13. Hosder, S.,Walters, R.W., Perez, R.: A Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos Method. Technical Report 2006-891, AIAA, Reno (2006)
14. Hou, T., Lou,W.,Rozovskii, B., Zhou, H.M.:Wiener chaos expansions and numerical solutions of randomly forced equations of fluid mechanics. J. Comp. Phys. 216, 687-"706 (2006)
15. Hu, S., Shu, C.W.: A technique for treating negative weights in WENO schemes. J. Comp. Phys. 175, 108-"127 (2002)
16. Jiang, G., Shu, C.W.: Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comp. Phys. 126, 202-"228 (1996) (Pubitemid 126162204)
17. Koren, B.: Upwind schemes for the Navier-"Stokes equations. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Hyperbolic Problems. Vieweg, Braunschweig (1988)
18. LeMaitre, O., Knio, O., Najm, H., Ghanem, R.: Uncertainty propagation using Wiener-"Haar expansions. J. Comput. Phys. 28-"57 (2004) (Pubitemid 38739642)
19. LeMaitre, O., Najm, H., Ghanem, R., Knio, O.: Multi-resolution analysis of Wiener-type uncertainty propagation schemes. J. Comp. Phys. 197, 502-"531 (2004) (Pubitemid 38955945)
20. LeVeque, R.: High resolution finite volume methods on arbitrary grids via wave propagation. J. Comp. Phys. 78, 36 (1988)
21. Mathelin, L., Hussaini, M.Y., Zang, T.: Stochastic approaches to uncertainty quantification in CFD simulations. Numer. Algorithms 38, 209-"236 (1988)
22. Metropolis, N., Ulam, S.: The Monte Carlo method. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 44(247), 335-"341 (1949)
23. Reagan,M., Najm, H., Ghanem, R., Knio, O.: Uncertainty quantification in reacting-flow simulations through non-intrusive spectral projection. Flame, pp. 545-"555 (2003) (Pubitemid 36344128)
24. Saad, Y.: Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems. PWS Publishing Company, Boston (1996)
25. Saad,Y., Schultz,M.H.: Gmres: AGeneralized MinimumResidual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comp. 7(3), 856-"869 (1986)
26. Schmidtt, V., Charpin, F.: Pressure Distributions on the ONERA M6 Wing at Transonic Mach Numbers. Technical Report. AGARD AR-138, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (1979)
27. Schwarz, H.A.: Uber einige abbildungensaufgaben. J. Reine Angew. Math. 70, 105-"120 (1869)
28. Shu, C.W.: High order ENO and WENO schemes for computational fluid dynamics. In: Barth, T., Deconinck, H. (eds.) High-Order Discretization Methods in Computational Physics, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 439-"582. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
29. Smith, B., Bjorstad, P., Gropp, W.: Domain Decomposition: Parallel Multilevel Methods for Elliptic Partial Differential Equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)
30. Spekreijse, S.: Multigrid solution of monotone second-order discretizations of hyperbolic conservation laws. Math. Comp. 49, 135-"155 (1987)
31. van Leer, B.: Towards the ultimate conservative difference schemes V. A second order sequel to Godunov's method. J. Comp. Phys. 32, 101-"136 (1979)
32. van Leer, B.: Flux-Vector Splitting for the Euler Equations. Technical Report. ICASE -82-30, Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering (ICASE), NASA Langley (1982)
33. van Leer, B.: Upwind-Difference Schemes for Aerodynamics Problems Governed by the Euler Equations. AMS Pub, Providence (1985)
34. Wan, X., Karniadakis, G.: An adaptive multi-element generalized polynomial chaos method for stochastic differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 209, 617-"642 (2005) (Pubitemid 40919643)
35. Wiener, N.: The homogeneous chaos. Am. J. Math. 60, 897-"936 (1938)
36. Witteveen, J., Bijl, H.: A monomial chaos approach for efficient uncertainty quantification in nonlinear problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 30, 1296-"1317 (2008)
37. Xiu, D., Karniadakis, G.: Modeling uncertainty in flow simulation via generalized polynomial chaos. J. Comp. Phys. 187, 137-"167 (2002)