Protection cost evaluation of WDM-based next generation optical access networks

Optical Switching and Networking

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 89-99

  Mahloo, Mozhgan ^a   Mas MacHuca, Carmen ^b   Chen, Jiajia ^a   Wosinska, Lena ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Next generation optical access networks; Passive optical networks; Wavelength division multiplexing

Indexed keywords

ACCESS NETWORK; ACCESS NETWORK DESIGN; ADVANCED NETWORKS; BACKUP RESOURCES; COST EVALUATIONS; CURRENT TECHNOLOGY; DENSE URBAN AREAS; END USERS; HIGH CAPACITY; IS COSTS; LAYOUT DESIGNS; NETWORK OPERATOR; NETWORK RELIABILITY; NEXT GENERATION ACCESS NETWORKS; OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURES; OPTICAL ACCESS; OPTICAL ACCESS NETWORKS; SPLITTING RATIO; TECHNO-ECONOMIC STUDIES; TRAFFIC DEMANDS; WDM TECHNOLOGY;

ASPECT RATIO; COSTS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; FIBERS; INVESTMENTS; PASSIVE OPTICAL NETWORKS; PROFITABILITY; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER; TIME DIVISION MULTIPLEXING; WAVELENGTH DIVISION MULTIPLEXING;

NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS;

EID: 84869086685     PISSN: 15734277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.osn.2012.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. 249025-ICT OASE Project Deliverable 2.1, Requirements for European Next-Generation Optical Access Networks.
2. R. Huślsermann, C. Lange, Topology analysis of the access/aggregation network structure in future optical access networks, in: Proceedings of the 11th ITG Conference on Photonic Networks, Leipzig, Germany, May 03-04, 2010.
3. 249025-ICT OASE Project Milestone 4.2, Assessment of Next Generation Optical Access System Concepts.
4. M. De Andrade, G. Kramer, L. Wosinska, J. Chen, S. Sallent, and B. Mukherjee Evaluating strategies for evolution of passive optical networks IEEE Communications Magazine 49 7 2011 176 184 (Juliol)
5. J. Prat, J.A. Lázaro, K. Kanonakis, I. Tomkos, New FTTH architectures for NG-PON-2, OSA Access Networks and In-house Communications (ANIC) Topical Meeting, June 21-24 2010, Karlsruhe, Germany.
6. A.M.J. Koonen, N.C. Tran, E. Tangdiongga, The merits of reconfigurability in WDM-TDM optical in-building networks, in: Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2011, 2011, pp. JWA63.
7. D. Breuer, C. Lange, E. Weis, M. Eiselt, M. Roppelt, K. Grobe, J.P. Elbers, S. Dahlfort, F. Cavaliere, D. Hood, Requirements and solutions for next-generation access, ITG Conference on Photonic Networks, May 2011, Leipzig, Germany
8. N.C. Tran, H.D. Jung, C. Okonkwo, E. Tangdiongga, T. Koonen, A 10 Gb/s Passive-Components-based WDM-TDM Reconfigurable, Optical Access Network Architecture, in: Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2011, 2011, pp. OThT1.
9. C. Mas Machuca, J. Chen, L. Wosinska, Impact of protection to capital and operational expenditures of optical access networks, Informations Technische Gesellschaft im VDE (ITG), May 2011, Leipzig, Germany.
10. J.K. Grobe, M. Roppelt, A. Autenrieth, J.P. Elbers, and M. Eiselt Cost and energy consumption analysis of advanced WDM-PONs Communications Magazine, IEEE 49 2011 s25 s32
11. C. Mas Machuca, M. Mahloo, J. Chen, L. Wosinska, Protection cost evaluation of two WDM-based next generation optical access networks, in: Asia Communications and Photonics Conference(ACP), November 2011, Shanghai, China.
12. K. Grobe, M. Roppelt, M. Eiselt, J.P. Elbers, Combined reach, client-count, power-consumption, and cost analysis of WDM-based next-generation PON, ECOC 2011, September 2011, Geneva, Switzerland.
13. Christoforos Kachris, Ioannis Tomkos, Power Consumption Evaluation of Hybrid WDM, PON Networks for Data Centers, Athens Information Technology, Athens, Greece.
14. M.A. Marsan, G. Francese, F. Neri, Manhattan topologies for passive all-optical networks, in: 9th Annual European Fibre Optic Communications and Local Area Network Exposition, June 1991, London, UK.
15. 249025-ICT OASE Project Deliverable 4.2.1, Technical Assessment and Comparison of Next-Generation Optical Access System Concepts.
16. OASE Project Deliverable 5.2, Process Modeling and First Version of TCO Evaluation Tool.