The role of relatedness in structuring the social network of a wild guppy population

Oecologia

Volumn 170, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 955-963

  Croft, Darren P ^a   Hamilton, P B ^a   Darden, S K ^a   Jacoby, D M P ^a,c   James, R ^b   Bettaney, E M ^b   Tyler, C R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

^c THE LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cooperation; Group living; Poecilia reticulata; Social assortment; Social organisation

Indexed keywords

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; KIN RECOGNITION; RELATEDNESS; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIAL ORGANIZATION; TELEOST; WILD POPULATION;

ANIMALIA; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; POECILIA RETICULATA;

EID: 84869086679     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2379-8     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Barson NJ, Cable J, van Oosterhout C (2009) Population genetic analysis of microsatellite variation of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in Trinidad and Tobago: evidence for a dynamic source-sink metapopulation structure, founder events and population bottlenecks. J Evol Biol 22: 485-497.
2. Becher SA, Russell ST, Magurran AE (2002) Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellites in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Mol Ecol Notes 2: 456-458.
3. Brown GE, Brown JA (1993) Social dynamics in salmonid fishes-do kin make better neighbours. Anim Behav 45: 863-871.
4. Brown GE, Brown JA, Wilson WR (1996) The effects of kinship on the growth of juvenile Arctic charr. J Fish Biol 48: 313-320.
5. Chivers DP, Brown GE, Smith RJF (1995) Familiarity and shoal cohesion in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas)-implications for antipredator behaviour. Can J Zool 73: 955-960.
6. Croft DP, Albanese B, Arrowsmith BJ, Botham M, Webster M, Krause J (2003a) Sex biased movement in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Oecologia 137: 62-68.
7. Croft DP et al (2003b) Mechanisms underlying shoal composition in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Oikos 100: 429-438.
8. Croft DP, Arrowsmith BJ, Webster M, Krause J (2004a) Intrasexual preferences for familiar individuals in male guppies (Poecilia reticulata). J Fish Biol 64: 279-283.
9. Croft DP, Darden SK, Ruxton GD (2009a) Predation risk as a driving force for phenotypic assortment: a cross-population comparison. Proc R Soc Lond B 276(1663): 1899-1904.
10. Croft DP, James R, Krause J (2008) Exploring animal social networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
11. Croft DP et al (2006) Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59: 644-650.
12. Croft DP, Krause J, Darden SK, Ramnarine IW, Faria JJ, James R (2009b) Behavioural trait assortment in a social network: patterns and implications. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63: 1495-1503.
13. Croft DP, Krause J, James R (2004b) Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc R Soc Lond B 271: S516-S519.
14. Crowley PH (1992) Resampling methods for computation-intensive data-analysis in ecology and evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23: 405-477.
15. Darden SK, James R, Ramnarine IW, Croft DP (2009) Social implications of the battle of the sexes: sexual harassment disrupts female sociality and social recognition. Proc R Soc Lond B 276: 2651-2656.
16. Dowling TE, Moore WS (1986) Absence of population subdivision in the common shiner, Notropis cornutus (Cyprinidae). Environ Biol Fish 15: 151-155.
17. Dugatkin LA (1988) Do guppies play tit for tat during predator inspection visits? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23: 395-399.
18. Dugatkin LA (1992) Tendency to inspect predators predicts mortality risk in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol 3: 124-127.
19. Estoup A, Largiader CR, Perrot E, Chourrout D (1996) Rapid one-tube DNA extraction for reliable PCR detection of fish polymorphic markers and transgenes. Mol Mar Biol Biotech 5: 295-298.
20. Evans JP, Kelley JL (2008) Implications of multiple mating for offspring relatedness and shoaling behaviour in juvenile guppies. Biol Lett 4: 623-626.
21. Fitzgerald GJ, Morrissette J (1992) Kin recognition and choice of shoal mates by three-spine sticklebacks. Ethol Ecol Evol 4: 273-283.
22. Fletcher JA, Doebeli M (2009) A simple and general explanation for the evolution of altruism. Proc R Soc Lond B 276: 13-19.
23. Gerlach G, Hodgins-Davis A, MacDonald B, Hannah R (2007) Benefits of kin association: related and familiar zebrafish larvae (Danio rerio) show improved growth. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61: 1765-1770.
24. Godin JGJ, Davis SA (1995) Who dares, benefits: predator approach behaviour in the guppy (Poecilia reticualta) deters predator pursuit. Proc R Soc Lond B 259: 193-200.
25. Grether GF, Millie DF, Bryant MJ, Reznick DN, Mayea W (2001) Rain forest canopy cover, resource availability, and life history evolution in guppies. Ecology 82: 1546-1559.
26. Griffiths SW (2003) Learned recognition of conspecifics by fishes. Fish Fish 4: 256-268.
27. Hain TJA, Neff BD (2007) Multiple paternity and kin recognition mechanisms in a guppy population. Mol Ecol 16: 3938-3946.
28. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I J Theor Biol 7: 1-16.
29. Hatchwell BJ (2010) Cryptic kin selection: kin structure in vertebrate populations and opportunities for kin-directed cooperation. Ethology 116: 203-216.
30. Hughes KA, Du L, Rodd FH, Reznick DN (1999) Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim Behav 58: 907-916.
31. Jones OR, Wang J (2009) COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multi locus genotype data. Mol Ecol Resour 10: 551-555.
32. Kalinowski S, Wagner A, Taper M (2006) ML-RELATE: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 576-579.
33. Kelley JL, Graves JA, Magurran AE (1999) Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies. Nature 401: 661-662.
34. Klimley AP, Holloway CF (1999) School fidelity and homing synchronicity of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares. Mar Biol 133: 307-317.
35. Krause J, Croft DP, James R (2007) Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: potential applications. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62: 15-27.
36. Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
37. Landeau L, Terborgh J (1986) Oddity and the confusion effect in predation. Anim Behav 34: 1372-1380.
38. Magurran AE (2005) Evolutionary ecology: the Trinidadian guppy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
39. Magurran AE, Higham A (1988) Information transfer across fish shoals under predator threat. Ethology 78: 153-158.
40. Magurran AE, Seghers BH (1994) Sexual conflict as a consequence of ecology-evidence from guppy, Poecilia reticulata, populations in Trinidad. Proc R Soc Lond B 255: 31-36.
41. Metcalfe NB, Thomson BC (1995) Fish recognise and prefer to shoal with poor competitors. Proc R Soc Lond B 259: 207-210.
42. Milinski M (1987) Tit-for-tat in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation. Nature 325: 433-435.
43. Milinski M, Külling D, Kettler R (1990) Tit for tat: sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) "trusting" a cooperating partner. Behav Ecol 1: 7-11.
44. Milinski M, Luthi JH, Eggler R, Parker GA (1997) Cooperation under predation risk: experiments on costs and benefits. Proc R Soc Lond B 264: 831-837.
45. Milligan B (2003) Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness. Genetics 163: 1153-1167.
46. Naish KA, Carvalho GR, Pitcher TJ (1993) The genetic-structure and microdistribution of shoals of Phoxinus phoxinus, the European minnow. J Fish Biol 43: 75-89.
47. Neill SR, ST J, Cullen JM (1974) Experiments on whether schooling by their prey affects the hunting behaviour of cephalopods and fish predators. J Zool 172: 549-569.
48. Nowak MA, Tarnita CE, Antal T (2010) Evolutionary dynamics in structured populations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 365: 19-30.
49. Ohguchi O (1978) Experiments on the selection against colour oddity of water fleas by three-spined stickelbacks. Z Tierpsychol 47: 254-267.
50. Olsén KH, JäUrvi T (1997) Effects of kinship on aggression and RNA content in juvenile Arctic charr. J Fish Biol 51: 422-435.
51. Paterson IG, Crispo E, Kinnison MT, Hendry AP, Bentzen P (2005) Characterization of tetranucleotide microsatellite markers in guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Mol Ecol Notes 5: 269-271.
52. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) Genalex 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288-295.
53. Peuhkuri N, Seppa P (1998) Do three-spined sticklebacks group with kin? Ann Zool Fenn 35: 21-27.
54. Pitcher TJ, Green DA, Magurran AE (1986) Dicing with death-predator inspection behaviour in minnow shoals. J Fish Biol 28: 439-448.
55. Pitcher TJ, Magurran AE, Allan JR (1983) Shifts of behaviour with shoal size in Cyprinids. In: Proceedings of the 3rd British Freshwater Fish Conference, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, pp 220-228.
56. Piyapong C, Butlin RK, Faria JJ, Scruton KJ, Wang J, Krause J (2011) Kin assortment in juvenile shoals in wild guppy populations. Heredity 106: 749-756.
57. Platt TG, Bever JD (2009) Kin competition and the evolution of cooperation. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 370-377.
58. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1. 2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86: 248-249.
59. Reznick DN, Butler MJ, Rodd FH, Ross P (1996) Life-history evolution in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). 6. Differential mortality as a mechanism for natural selection. Evolution 50: 1651-1660.
60. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225.
61. Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP'007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 103-106.
62. Russell ST, Kelley JL, Graves JA, Magurran AE (2004) Kin structure and shoal composition dynamics in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Oikos 106: 520-526.
63. Schradin C (2000) Confusion effect in a reptilian and a primate predator. Ethology 106: 691-700.
64. Shen X, Yang G, Liao M (2007) Development of 51 genomic microsatellite DNA markers of guppy (Poecilia reticulata) and their application in closely related species. Mol Ecol Notes 7: 302-306.
65. Sih A, Hanser SF, McHugh KA (2009) Social network theory: new insights and issues for behavioural ecologists Behav. Ecol Sociobiol 63: 975-988.
66. Swaney W, Kendal J, Capon H, Brown C, Laland KN (2001) Familiarity facilitates social learning of foraging behaviour in the guppy. Anim Behav 62: 591-598.
67. Theodorakis CW (1989) Size segregation and the effects of oddity on predation risk in minnow schools. Anim Behav 38: 496-502.
68. Utne-Palm AC, Hart PJB (2000) The effects of familiarity on competitive interactions between three-spined sticklebacks. Oikos 91: 225-232.
69. van Havre N, Fitzgerald GJ (1988) Shoaling and kin recognition in the three-spine Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Biol Behav 13: 190-201.
70. van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4: 535-538.
71. Ward AJW et al (2002) Association patterns and shoal fidelity in the three-spined stickleback. Proc R Soc Lond B 269: 2451-2455.
72. Ward AJW, Hart PJB (2003) The effects of kin and familiarity on interactions between fish. Fish Fish 4: 348-358.
73. Watanabe T, Yoshida M, Nakajima M, Taniguchi N (2003) Isolation and characterization of 43 microsatellite DNA markers for guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Mol Ecol Notes 3: 487-490.
74. West SA, Murray MG, Machado CA, Griffin AS, Herre EA (2001) Testing Hamilton's rule with competition between relatives. Nature 409: 510-513.
75. West SA, Pen I, Griffin AS (2002) Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science 296: 72-75.