Structural characterization, mechanical properties, and in vitro cytocompatibility evaluation of fibrous polycarbonate urethane membranes for biomedical applications

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 100 A, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3042-3050

  Arjun, G N ^a   Ramesh, P ^a  

^a SREE CHITRA TIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Electrospinning; Fibroporous membranes; In vitro cytocompatibility; Membrane morphology; Polycarbonate urethane

Indexed keywords

AMIDES; BIODEGRADATION; BIOMECHANICS; CELL CULTURE; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; COBALT; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTROSPINNING; ESTERS; HYDROGEN; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; MORPHOLOGY; ORGANIC SOLVENTS; POLYCARBONATES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

3D ARCHITECTURES; AVERAGE FIBER DIAMETERS; BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS; COBALT CHLORIDES; CORRELATION STUDIES; CYTOCOMPATIBILITY; DYNAMIC MECHANICAL TEST; FIBER DIAMETERS; FIBROBLAST CELLS; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATIONS; MEMBRANE MORPHOLOGY; MICRO COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (MICRO-CT); MIXED SOLVENT; N ,N-DIMETHYLFORMAMIDE; NON-WOVEN MEMBRANES; POLYCARBONATE URETHANE; POROUS ARCHITECTURES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; STATIC MECHANICAL TEST; STRUCTURAL CHARACTERIZATION; STRUCTURAL MORPHOLOGY; TETRA-HYDROFURAN;

FIBROUS MEMBRANES;

BIONATE; CARBOTHANE; CHRONOFLEX; COBALT CHLORIDE; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; N,N DIMETHYLFORMAMIDE; POLYCARBONATE; POLYURETHAN; TETRAHYDROFURAN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; DEGRADATION; ELECTROSPINNING; FIBROBLAST; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MEMBRANE; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MORPHOLOGY; OXIDATION; PERFORMANCE; POROSITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 84869083793     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34255     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Dai TH, Yu H, Zhang K, Zhu MF, Chen YM, Adler HJ. Fabricating novel thermal crosslinked ultrafine fibers via electrospinning. J Appl Polym Sci 2008;107:2142-2149. (Pubitemid 351204628)
2. Formhals A, U. S. Pat.1, 975, 504 (1934).
3. Huang ZM, Zhang YZ, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 2003;63:2223-2225.
4. Stamatialis DF, Papenburg BJ, Girones M, Saiful S, Bettahalli SNM, Schmitmeier S, Wessling M. Medical applications of membranes: Drug delivery, artificial organs and tissue engineering. J Membr Sci 2008;308:1-34. (Pubitemid 350284596)
5. Ye SH, Watanabe J, Iwasaki Y, Ishihara K. In situ modification on cellulose acetate hollow fiber membrane modified with phospholipid polymer for biomedical application. J Membr Sci 2005;249:133-141. (Pubitemid 40187318)
6. Duling RR, Dupaix RB, Katsube N, Lannutti J. Mechanical characterization of electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL): A potential scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomech Eng 2008;130:011006-011006 (13).
7. Yang F, Both SK, Yang X, Walboomers XF, Jansen JA. Development of an electrospun nano-Apatite/PCL composite membrane for GTR/GBR application. Acta Biomater 2009;5:3295-3304.
8. Lelah MD, Cooper SL. Polyurethanes in Medicine. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1986.
9. Fare S, Petrini P, Motta A, Cigada A, Tanzi M. Synergistic effects of oxidative environments and mechanical stress on in vitro stability of polyetherurethanes and polycarbonateurethanes. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:62-74. (Pubitemid 29068440)
10. Mathur AB, Collier TO, Kao WJ, Wiggins M, Schubert MA, Hiltner A, Anderson JM. In vivo biocompatibility and biostability of modified polyurethanes. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:246-257. (Pubitemid 27330048)
11. Salacinski HJ, Tai NR, Carson RJ, Edwards A, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM. In vitro stability of a novel compliant poly (carbonate-urea) urethane to oxidative and hydrolytic stress. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;59:207-218. (Pubitemid 33126623)
12. Salacinski HJ, Odlyha M, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM. Thermo-mechanical analysis of a compliant poly (carbonate-urea) urethane after exposure to hydrolytic, oxidative, peroxidative and biological solutions. Biomaterials 2002;23:2231-2240. (Pubitemid 34226583)
13. Chandy T, Hee JV, Nettekoven W, Johnson J. Long-term in vitro stability assessment of polycarbonate urethane micro catheters: Resistance to oxidation and stress cracking. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2009;89B: 314-324.
14. Wiggins MJ, MacEwan M, Anderson JM, Hiltner A. Effect of softsegment chemistry on polyurethane biostability during in vitro fatigue loading. J Biomed Mater Res 2004;68 A: 668-683. (Pubitemid 38263932)
15. Guan J, Fujimoto KL, Sacks MS, Wagner WR. Preparation and characterization of highly porous, biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds for soft tissue applications. Biomaterials 2006;26:3961-3971.
16. McKee MG, Park T, Unal S, Yilgor I, Long TE. Electrospinning of linear and highly branched segmented poly (urethane urea) s. Polymer 2005;46:2011-2015. (Pubitemid 40311671)
17. Lee S. Multifunctionality of layered fabric systems based on electrospun polyurethane/zinc oxide nanocomposite fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 2009;114:3652-3658.
18. Peng P, Chen YZ, Gao YF, Yu J, Guo ZX. Phase morphology and mechanical properties of the electrospun polyoxymethylene/polyurethane blend fiber mats. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 2009;47:1853-1859.
19. Demir MM, Yilgor I, Yilgor E, Erman B. Electrospinning of polyurethane fibers. Polymer 2002;43:3303-3309. (Pubitemid 34292926)
20. Wang H, Feng Y, Behl M, Lendlein A, Zhao H, Xiao R, Lu J, Zhang L, Guo J. Hemocompatible PU/gelatin-heparin nanofibrous scaffolds as potential artificial blood vessels by bi-layer electrospinning technique. Front Chem Sci Eng 2011;5:392-400.
21. Wang H, Feng Y, Zhao H, Xiao R, Lu J, Zhang L, Guo J. Biomimetic hemocompatible nanofibrous scaffolds as potential smalldiameter blood vessels by bilayering electrospun technique. Adv Mater Res 2011;306-307:1627-1630.
22. Lee SJ, Oh SH, Liu J, Soker S, Atala A, Yoo JJ. The use of thermal treatments to enhance the mechanical properties of electrospun poly (e-caprolactone) scaffolds. Biomaterials 2008;29:1422-1430.
23. Christenson EM, Anderson JM, Hiltner A. Oxidative mechanisms of poly (carbonate urethane) and poly (ether urethane) biodegradation: In vivo and in vitro correlations. J Biomed Mater Res 2004;70A: 245-255. (Pubitemid 38988755)
24. Neamnark A, Sanchavanakit N, Pavasant P, Rujiravanit R, Supaphol P. In vitro biocompatibility of electrospun hexanoyl chitosan fibrous scaffolds towards human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Eur Polym J 2008;44:2060-2067.
25. Feng Y, Meng F, Xiao R, Zhao H, Guo J. Electrospinning of polycarbonate urethane biomaterials. Front Chem Sci Eng 2010;5:11-18.
26. Gibson P, Gibson HS, Rivin D. Transport properties of porous membranes based on electrospun nanofibers. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp 2001;187:469-481. (Pubitemid 32619181)
27. Pedicini A, Farris RJ. Mechanical behaviour of electrospun polyurethane. Polymer 2003;44:6857-6862.
28. Christenson EM, Anderson JM, Hiltner A. Antioxidant inhibition of poly (carbonate urethane) in vivo biodegradation. J Biomed Mater Res 2006;76A: 480-490.
29. Heureux NL, Dusserre N, Konig G, Victor B, Keire P, Wight TN, Chronos NAF, Kyles AE, Gregory CR, Hoyt G, Robbins RC, McAllister TN. Human tissue-engineered blood vessels for adult arterial revascularization. Nat Med 2006;12:361-365. (Pubitemid 43355087)
30. Zerris VA, James KS, Roberts JB, Bell E, Heilman CB. Repair of the dura mater with processed collagen devices. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2007;83B: 580-588. (Pubitemid 350005031)
31. Park JG, Ye Q, Topp EM, Lee CH, Kostoryz EL, Misra A, Spencer P. Dynamic mechanical analysis and esterase degradation of dentin adhesives containing a branched methacrylate. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2009;91 B: 61-70.
32. Hill DJT, Perera MCS, Pomery PJ, Toh HK. Dynamic mechanical properties of networks prepared from siloxane modified divinyl benzene pre-polymers. Polymer 2000;41:9131-9137.
33. McCabe JF, Arikawa H. Rheological properties of elastomeric impression materials before and during setting. J Dent Res 1998;77:1874-1880. (Pubitemid 32763663)
34. Lamba N, Woodhouse K, Cooper S. Polyurethanes in biomedical applications, 2nd ed. Florida: CRC Press; 1998.
35. Eceiza A, Martin MD, de la Caba K, Kortaberria G, Gabilondo N, Corcuera MA, Mondragon I. Thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers based on polycarbonate diols with different soft segment molecular weight and chemical structure: mechanical and thermal properties. Polym Eng Sci 2008;48:297-306. (Pubitemid 351262314)
36. Frank A, Lipscomb GG, Dennis M. Visualization of concentration fields in hemodialyzers by computed tomography. J Membr Sci 2000;175:239-251. (Pubitemid 30398571)
37. Ho ST, Hutmacher DW. A comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in the characterization of scaffolds. Biomaterials 2006;27:1362-1376. (Pubitemid 41739562)
38. Lamke LO, Nilsson GE, Reithner HL. The evaporative water loss from burns and the water-vapour permeability of grafts and artificial membranes used in the treatment of burns. Burns 1977;3:159-165. (Pubitemid 8130058)
39. Queen D, Gaylor JDS, Evans JH, Courtney JM, Reid WH. The preclinical evaluation of the water vapour transmission rate through burn wound dressings. Biomaterials 1987;8:367-391.
40. Struik LCE. Physical Ageing in Amorphous Polymers and Other Materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1978.
41. 2 as Wound Dressings. Fibers Polym 2011;12:207-213.