Framework for the integrated video quality assessment

Multimedia Tools and Applications

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 787-817

  Mu, Mu ^a   Romaniak, Piotr ^b   Mauthe, Andreas ^a   Leszczuk, Mikołaj ^b   Janowski, Lucjan ^b   Cerqueira, Eduardo ^c  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b AGH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Content distribution network; Mean opinion score; Perceptual quality; Quality of experience; Video quality metrics

Indexed keywords

CONTENT DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; MEAN OPINION SCORES; PERCEPTUAL QUALITY; QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE (QOE); VIDEO QUALITY;

HARDWARE; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS;

QUALITY OF SERVICE;

EID: 84869083575     PISSN: 13807501     EISSN: 15737721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-011-0946-3     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Addis B, Leyffer S (2006) A trust-region algorithm for global optimization. Comput Optim Appl 35(3):287-304. doi:10.1007/s10589-006-8716-2 (Pubitemid 44729032)
2. Botta A, Pescape A (2011) Ip packet interleaving: bridging the gap between theory and practice. In: Proc. IEEE symp. computers and communications (ISCC), pp 1022-1029. doi:10.1109/ISCC.2011.5983976
3. Botta A, Pescapè A, Ventre G (2008) Quality of service statistics over heterogeneous networks: analysis and applications. Elesevier EJOR
4. Brand ando T, Queluz M (2010) No-reference quality assessment of h.264/avc encoded video. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 20(11):1437-1447. doi:10.1109/TCSVT.2010.2077474
5. Chan A, Zeng K, Mohapatra P, Lee SJ, Banerjee S (2010) Metrics for evaluating video streaming quality in lossy ieee 802.11 wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 29th conference on information communications, INFOCOM'10. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp 1613-1621. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id= 1833515.1833741
6. Claypool M, Zhu Y (2003) Using interleaving to ameliorate the effects of packet loss in a video stream. In: Proc. 23rd int distributed computing systems workshops conf, pp 508-513. doi:10.1109/ICDCSW.2003.1203604
7. CMPMediaLLC (2009) Measuring IPTVQoS performance at the box. http://www.digitaltvdesignline. com/
8. Dosselmann R, Yang XD (2007) A prototype no-reference video quality system. In: Fourth Canadian conference on computer and robot vision, CRV '07, vol 2007, pp 411-417
9. Eskicioglu AM (2000) Quality measurement for monochrome compressed images in the past 25 years. In: Proceedings of the international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP). IEEE, Istanbul, Turkey, pp 1907-1910
10. Eskicioglu AM, Fisher PS (1995) Image quality measures and their performance. IEEE Trans Commun 43(12):2959-2965
11. Farias MCQ, Mitra SK (2005) No-reference video quality metric based on artifact measurements. In: IEEE international conference on image processing, ICIP 2005, vol 3, pp III-141-4
12. Fukumoto K (2004) Taking bounded variables seriously: extended beta binomial, asymmetric logit, and time series. In: Research workshop in applied statistics
13. Geerts D, De Moor K, Ketyko I, Jacobs A, Van den Bergh J, JosephW, Martens L, De Marez L (2010) Linking an integrated framework with appropriate methods for measuring qoe. In: Second international workshop on quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX)
14. ITU-R (1998) ITU-R BT.1129 subjective assessment of standard definition digital television (SDTV) systems. ITU-R
15. ITU-R (1998) ITU-R BT.500 methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures, Geneva, Switzerland
16. ITU-T (1996) ITU-T P.800 methods for subjective determination of transmission quality. ITU-T, Geneva, Switzerland
17. ITU-T (1999) ITU-T P.910 subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. ITU-T
18. Jain R (2004) Quality of experience. IEEE Multimed 11(1):96-95
19. Kangasharju J, Mu M, Colussi GD (2008) Application-level fairness. In: Proc. international conference on information networking 2008 (ICOIN 2008), Busan, Korea
20. Kwon JC, Jang SH, Chin Y, Oh SJ (2010) A novel video quality impairment monitoring scheme over an ipty service with packet loss. In: 2010 second international workshop on quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX), pp 224-229. doi:10.1109/QOMEX.2010.5516127
21. Lee J, Hoppel K (1989) Noise modeling and estimation of remotely-sensed images. In: Proc. international geoscience and remote sensing, Vancouver, Canada, vol 2, pp 1005-1008
22. Liang YJ, Apostolopoulos JG,Girod B (2003) Analysis of packet loss for compressed video: does burst-length matter? In: Proc. IEEE int. conf. acoustics, speech, and signal processing (ICASSP '03), vol 5. doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2003. 1200063
23. Liu T, Wang Y, Boyce JM, Yang H, Wu Z (2009) A novel video quality metric for low bitrate video considering both coding and packet-loss artifacts. IEEE J Select Top Signal Process 3(2):280-293. doi:10.1109/JSTSP.2009.2015069
24. MSU Graphics & Media Lab (Video Group) (2009) MSU video quality measurement tool. http://compression.ru/video/quality-measure/video-measurement- tool-en.html/
25. Mu M, Mauthe A, Garcia F (2008) A utility-based qos model for emerging multimedia applications. In: Proc. first IEEE future multimedia networking (FMN 08) workshop, Cardiff, UK
26. Mu M, Gostner R, Mauthe A, Garcia F, Tyson G (2009) Visibility of individual packet loss on h.264 encoded video stream - a user study on the impact of packet loss on perceived video quality. In: Proc. sixteenth annual multimedia computing and networking (MMCN'09), San Jose, California, USA
27. MuM, MautheA, Haley R, Garcia F (2011) Discrete quality assessment in IPTV content distribution networks. Signal Process Image Commun 26(7):339-357, Advances in IPTV Technologies, Elsevier
28. Ohm J-R (1999) Bildsignalverarbeitung für Multimedia-Systeme, Berlin
29. OPTICOM (2007) Perceptual evaluation of video quality. http://www.opticom.de/technology/pevq.html
30. Pinson M, Wolf S, Gallagher M (2004) The impact of monitor resolution and type on subjective video quality testing
31. van den Branden Lambrecht CJ, Verscheure O (1996) Perceptual quality measure using a spatiotemporal model of the human visual system. In: Proc. SPIE, vol 2668, pp 450-461
32. VQEG (2004) Index VQEG test sequences. ftp://vqeg.its.bldrdoc.gov/SDTV/ VQEG-PhaseI/ TestSequences/
33. VQEG (2008) Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of multimedia quality assessment, phase I. ftp://vqeg.its.bldrdoc.gov/Documents/Projects/ multimedia/MM-Final-Report/VQEG- Multimedia-PhaseI-Final-Report.zip
34. VQEG (2008) Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment, phase II.VQEGfinal report of FR-TV phase II validation test
35. VQEG (2009) The video quality experts group. http://www.vqeg.org/
36. Wang Y (2006) Survey of objective video quality measurements. EMC Corporation Hopkinton. ftp://ftp.cs.wpi.edu/pub/techreports/pdf/06-02.pdf
37. Wang Z (1998) Objective image/video quality measurement - a literature survey. In: EE 381k: multidimensional digital signal processing
38. Wang Z, Lu L, Bovik AC (2004) Video quality assessment based on structural distortion measurement. Signal Process Image Commun 19(2):121-213
39. Winkler S (1999) A perceptual distortion metric for digital color video. In: Proc. SPIE, vol 3644, pp 175-184
40. Winkler S (2005) Digital video quality - vision models and metrics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
41. Winkler S (2007) Video quality and beyond. In: Proc. European signal processing conference, Poznan, Poland
42. Wolf S, Pinson MH (1999) Spatial-temporal distortion metrics for in-service quality monitoring of any digital video system. In: Proc. SPIE, vol 3845, pp 266-277 (Pubitemid 30533860)
43. Yang F, Wan S, Xie Q, Wu HR (2010) No-reference quality assessment for networked video via primary analysis of bit stream. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 20(11):1544-1554. doi:10.1109/TCSVT.2010.2087433
44. Yim C, Bovik AC (2011) Evaluation of temporal variation of video quality in packet loss networks. Signal Process Image Commun 26(1):24-38. doi:10.1016/j.image.2010.11.002. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ B6V08-51FGSXF-1/2/b8af320f14b4e2c56a73dcb4ff042ca1