Relationships between functional and structural corticospinal tract integrity and walking post stroke

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 123, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2422-2428

  Jayaram, Gowri ^a,b   Stagg, Charlotte J ^b   Esser, Patrick ^c   Kischka, Udo ^d   Stinear, James ^e,f   Johansen Berg, Heidi ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d OXFORD CENTRE FOR ENABLEMENT   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^f NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

DTI; Locomotion; Motor recovery; Stroke; TMS

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPY; FUGL MEYER SCALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; LEG MOVEMENT; LEG MUSCLE; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYRAMIDAL TRACT; RATING SCALE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VASTUS LATERALIS MUSCLE; WALKING; WALKING AID; WALKING SPEED;

AGED; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; PYRAMIDAL TRACTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; WALKING;

EID: 84869080655     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.04.026     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ahn Y.H., Ahn S.H., Kim H., Hong J.H., Jang S.H. Can stroke patients walk after complete lateral corticospinal tract injury of the affected hemisphere?. Neuroreport 2006, 17:987-990.
2. Alagona G., Delvaux V., Gerard P., De Pasqua V., Pennisi G., Delwaide P.J., et al. Ipsilateral motor responses to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects and acute-stroke patients. Stroke 2001, 32:1304-1309.
3. Binkofski F., Seitz R.J., Arnold S., Claasen J., Benecke R., Freund H. Thalamic metabolism and corticospinal tract integrity determine motor recovery in stroke. Ann Neurol 1996, 39:460-471.
4. Caramia M., Palmieri M., Giacomini P., Iani C., Dally L., Silvestrini M. Ipsilateral activation of the unaffected motor cortex in patients with hemiparetic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 2000, 111:1990-1996.
5. Crofts J.J., Higham D.J., Bosnell R., Jbabdi S., Matthews P.M., Behrens T.E., et al. Network analysis detects changes in the contralesional hemisphere following stroke. Neuroimage 2011, 54:161-169.
6. Dawes H., Enzinger C., Johansen-Berg H., Bogdanovic M., Guy C., Collett J., et al. Walking performance and its recovery in chronic stroke in relation to extent of lesion overlap with the descending motor tract. Exp Brain Res 2008, 186:325-333.
7. Enzinger C., Dawes H., Johansen-Berg H., Wade D., Bogdanovic M., Collett J., et al. Brain activity changes associated with treadmill training after stroke. Stroke 2009, 40:2460-2467.
8. Enzinger C., Johansen-Berg H., Dawes H., Bogdanovic M.D., Collett J., Guy C., et al. Functional MRI correlates of lower limb function in stroke victims with gait impairment. Stroke 2008, 39:1507-1513.
9. Fugl-Meyer A.R., Jaasko L., Leyman I., Olsson S., Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975, 7:13-31.
10. Hendricks H.T., Hageman G., van Limbeek J. Prediction of recovery from upper extremity paralysis after stroke by measuring evoked potentials. Scand J Rehabil Med 1997, 29:155-159.
11. Hummel F., Celnik P., Giraux P., Floel A., Wu W.H., Gerloff C., et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005, 128:490-499.
12. Jang S.H., You S.H., Kwon Y.H., Hallett M., Lee M.Y., Ahn S.H. Cortical reorganization associated lower extremity motor recovery as evidenced by functional MRI and diffusion tensor tractography in a stroke patient. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2005, 23:325-329.
13. Johansen-Berg H., Della-Maggiore V., Behrens T.E., Smith S.M., Paus T. Integrity of white matter in the corpus callosum correlates with bimanual co-ordination skills. Neuroimage 2007, 36(Suppl. 2):T16-T21.
14. Luft A.R., Forrester L., Macko R.F., McCombe-Waller S., Whitall J., Villagra F., et al. Brain activation of lower extremity movement in chronically impaired stroke survivors. Neuroimage 2005, 26:184-194.
15. Luft A.R., Smith G.V., Forrester L., Whitall J., Macko R.F., Hauser T., et al. Comparing brain activation with isolated upper and lower limb movement across corresponding joints. Hum Brain Mapp 2002, 17:131-140.
16. Madhavan S., Rogers L.M., Stinear J.W. A paradox: after stroke, the non-lesioned lower limb motor cortex may be maladaptive. Eur J Neurosci 2010, 32:1032-1039.
17. Mansur C.G., Fregni F., Boggio P.S., Riberto M., Gallucci-Neto J., Santos C.M., et al. A sham-stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology 2005, 64:1802-1804.
18. Netz J., Lammers T., Homberg V. Reorganisation of motor output in the non-affected hemisphere after stroke. Brain 1997, 120:1579-1586.
19. Schaechter J.D., Fricker Z.P., Perdue K.L., Helmer K.G., Vangel M.G., Greve D.N., et al. Microstructural status of ipsilesional and contralesional corticospinal tract correlates with motor skill in chronic stroke patients. Hum Brain Mapp 2009, 30:3461-3474.
20. Shelton F., Reding M. Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 2001, 32:107-112.
21. Smith S.M., Jenkinson M., Woolrich M.W., Beckmann C.F., Behrens T.E., Johansen-Berg H., et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004, 23(Suppl. 1):S208-S219.
22. Stinear C.M., Barber P.A., Smale P.R., Coxon J.P., Fleming M.K., Byblow W.D. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain 2007, 130:170-180.
23. Tomassini V., Jbabdi S., Kincses Z.T., Bosnell R., Douaud G., Pozzilli C., et al. Structural and functional bases for individual differences in motor learning. Hum Brain Mapp 2011, 32:494-508.
24. Trompetto C., Assini A., Buccolieri A., Marchese R., Abbruzzese G. Motor recovery following stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Clin Neurophysiol 2000, 111:1860-1867.
25. Turton A., Wroe S., Trepte N., Fraser C., Lemon R.N. Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996, 101:316-328.
26. Ward N.S., Brown M.M., Thompson A.J., Frackowiak R.S. Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study. Brain 2003, 126:1430-1448.
27. Ward N.S., Newton J.M., Swayne O.B.C., Lee L., Thompson A.J., Greenwood R.J., et al. Motor system activation after subcortical stroke depends on corticospinal system integrity. Brain 2006, 129:809-819.