Recovery from an at-risk state: Clinical and functional outcomes of putatively prodromal youth who do not develop psychosis

Schizophrenia Bulletin

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1225-1233

  Schlosser, Danielle A ^a   Jacobson, Sarah ^b   Chen, Qiaolin ^c   Sugar, Catherine A ^b   Niendam, Tara A ^d   Li, Gang ^b   Bearden, Carrie E ^b   Cannon, Tyrone D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

at risk; conversion; functioning; prodrome; psychosis; schizophrenia

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOOD DISORDER; NEGATIVE SYNDROME; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOSIS; REMISSION; SURVIVAL RATE;

ADOLESCENT; AFFECTIVE SYMPTOMS; ANXIETY; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; PRODROMAL SYMPTOMS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS; REMISSION, SPONTANEOUS; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84869068015     PISSN: 05867614     EISSN: 17451701     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbr098     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Yung AR, McGorry PD. The initial prodrome in psychosis: descriptive and qualitative aspects. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1996;30:587-599.
2. Woods SW, Addington J, Cadenhead KS, et al. Validity of the prodromal risk syndrome for first psychosis: findings from the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35:894-908.
3. Klosterkoetter J, Hellmich M, Steinmeyer EM, Schultze-Lutter F. Diagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:158-164.
4. Koehler K, Sauer H. Huber's basic symptoms: another approach to negative psychopathology in schizophrenia. Compr Psychiatry. 1984;25:174-182.
5. Cannon TD, Cadenhead KD, Cornblatt B, et al. Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a multisite longitudinal study in North America. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65:28-37.
6. Olson KA, Rosenbaum B. Prospective investigations of the prodromal state of schizophrenia: assessment instruments. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006;113:273-282.
7. Ruhrmann S, Schultze-Lutter F, Salokangas RKR, et al. Prediction of psychosis in adolescents and young adults at high risk: results from the prospective European prediction of psychosis study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67:241-251.
8. Mason O, Startup M, Halpin S, Schall U, Conrad A, Carr V. Risk factors for transition to first episode psychosis among individuals with 'at-risk mental states'. Schizophr Res. 2004;71:227-237.
9. Yung AR, Nelson B, Stanford C, et al. Validation of ''prodromal'' criteria to detect individuals at ultra high risk of psychosis: 2 year follow-up. Schizophr Res. 2008;105:10-17.
10. Simon AE, Umbricht D. High remission rates from an ultrahigh risk state for psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2010;116: 168-172.
11. Addington J, Cornblatt BA, Cadenhead KS, et al. At clinical high risk for psychosis: outcome for nonconverters. Am J Psychiatry. April 15, 2011; doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011. 10081191.
12. Yung AR, Nelson B, Thompson A, Wood SJ. The psychosis threshold in ultra high risk (prodromal) research: is it valid? Schizophr Res. 2010;120:1-6.
13. Miller TJ, McGlashan TH, Rosen JL. Prospective diagnosis of the initial prodrome for schizophrenia based on the structured interview for prodromal syndromes: preliminary evidence of inter-rater reliability and predictive validity. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:863-865.
14. McGlashan TH. Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS). New Haven, CT: Yale University; 2001.
15. Meyer SE, Bearden CE, Lux SR, et al. The psychosis prodrome in adolescent patients viewed through the lens of DSM-IV. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2005;15:434-451.
16. First MB, Spitzer RI, Gibbon M, et al. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Patient Edition, Version 2.0. New York, NY: Biometric Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute; 1995.
17. Niendam TA, Bearden CE, Johnson JK, Cannon TD. Global Functioning: Role Scale (GF: Role). Los Angeles, CA: University of California; 2006.
18. Auther AM, Smith CW, Cornblatt BA. Global Functioning: Social Scale (GF: Social). Glen Oaks, NY: Zucker-Hillside Hospital; 2006.
19. Cornblatt B, Neindam T, Auther A, Smith C, Johnson JT. Validation of two new measures of functional outcome in the schizophrenia prodrome. Schizophr Bull. 2007;33:688-702.
20. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1980.
21. Cox DR, Oakes D. Analysis of Survival Data. London, UK: Chapman & Hall; 1984.
22. Kendler KS, McGuire M, Gruenberg AM, O'Hare A, Spellman M, Walsh D. The Roscommon family study: I. Methods, diagnosis of probands and risk of schizophrenia in relatives. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50:527-540.
23. Siever LJ, Koenigsberg HW, Harvey P, et al. Cognitive and brain function in schizotypal personality disorder. Schizophr Res. 2002;54:157-167.
24. Walker E, Kestler L, Bollini A, Hochman KM. Schizophrenia: etiology and course. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:401-430.
25. American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed, revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
26. Hafner H, Maurer K, Trendler G, Heiden W, Schmidt M. The early course of schizophrenia and depression. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005;167-173.
27. Yung AR, Phillips LJ, Yuen HP, et al. Psychosis prediction: 12-month follow up of a high risk (''prodromal'') group. Schizophr Res. 2003;60:21-32.