Free and open-source software application for the evaluation of coronary computed tomography angiography images

Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 944-951

  Hadlich, Marcelo Souza ^a,b,d,e,f   Oliveira, Gláucia Maria Moraes ^a,b,d   Feijóo, Raúl A ^c   Azevedo, Clerio F ^d,e,f   Tura, Bernardo Rangel ^e   Ziemer, Paulo Gustavo Portela ^c   Blanco, Pablo Javier ^c   Pina, Gustavo ^a   Meira, Márcio ^a   e Silva, Nelson Albuquerque de Souza ^a,b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b Instituto do Coração Edson Saad   (Brazil)

^c LABORATÓRIO NACIONAL DE COMPUTAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA   (Brazil)

^d Neurosurgeon at Rede Labs Dor   (Brazil)

^e INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CARDIOLOGIA   (Brazil)

^f D OR INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IDOR   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Coronary vessels; Diagnostic imaging; Software validation; Tomography scanners; X ray computed

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL IMAGING AND COMMUNICATIONS IN MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; STANDARDIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84869056524     PISSN: 0066782X     EISSN: 16784170     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0066-782X2012005000089     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Yamauchi T, Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Furuya T, Hayashi K, Sakuma T, et al. Efficacy and reliability of highly functional open source DICOM software (OsiriX) in spine surgery. J Clin Neurosc. 2010;17(6):756-9.
2. Peanykh OS. A brief history of DICOM. In: Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine. Philadelphia:Springer;2008.p.17-22.
3. Gibaud B. The DICOM standard: a brief overview. Philadelphia:Springer; 2008.p.1-10.
4. Graham RNJ, Perriss RW, Scarsbrook AF. DICOM demystified: a review of digital file formats and their use in radiological practice. Clin Radiol. 2005;60(11):1133-40.
5. Kon F. O Software aberto e a questão social. Relatório Técnico RT-MAC-2001-07. 2011:1-10.Departamento de Ciência da Computação, IME-USP.[Citado em 2011 jan 10].Disponível em: http://www.ime.usp.br/r Kon/publications.html
6. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Boxt LM, Budoff MJ, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting ofcoronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3(2):122-36.
7. Brooks RA. A quantitative theory of the Hounsfield unit and its application to dual energy scanning. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1977;1(4):487-93.
8. Budoff MJ, Cohen MC, Garcia MJ, Hogson JM, Hundley WG, Lima JA, et al. ACCF/AHA clinical competence statement on cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(2):383-402.
9. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74.
10. Janne d'Othée B, Siebert U, Cury R, Jadvar H, Dunn EJ, Hoffmann U. A systematic review on diagnostic accuracy of CT-based detection of significant coronary artery disease. Eur J Radiol. 2008;65(3):449-61.
11. Raggi P, Callister TQ, Cooil B, He ZX, Lippolis NJ, Russo DJ, et al. Identification of patients at increased risk of first unheralded acute myocardial infarction by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation.2000;101(8):850-5.
12. Guimaraes JA, Victor EG, de Britto Leite MR, Gomes JM, Victor Filho E, Reyes Liveras J. Reliability of the interpretation of coronary angiography by the simple visual method. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2000;74(4):300-8.
13. Banerjee S, Crook AM, Dawson JR, Timmis AD, Hemingway H. Magnitude and Consequences of Error in Coronary Angiography Interpretation (The ACRE Study). Am J Cardiol. 2000;85(3):309-4