Preliminary investigations into ontology-based collection selection

Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian Document Computing Symposium, ACDS 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  King, J D ^a   Li, Y ^a   Bruza, P D ^a   Nayak, R ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Digital libraries; Document databases; Information retrieval

Indexed keywords

DOCUMENT DATABASE; EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON; ONTOLOGY-BASED; SELECTION PROBLEMS; STATE OF THE ART; SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 84869044877     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. B. Billerbeck, A. Cannane, A. Chatteraj, N. Lester, W. Webber, H. E. Williams, J. Yiannis and J. Zobel. RMIT University at TREC 2004. In E. M. Voorhees and L. P. Buckland (editors), Proceedings Text Retrieval Conference (TREC), Gaithersburg, MD, November 2004. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 500-261.
2. P. Buitelaar. CoreLex: Systematic Polysemy and Underspecification. Ph.D. thesis, Computer Science Department, Brandeis University, 1998.
3. French J.C. Powell A.L. Callan, J. and M. Connell. The effects of query-based sampling on automatic database selection algorithms. In Technical Report CMU-LTI-00-162, Carnegie Mellon University, 2000. Langauage Technologies Institute, School of Computer Science.
4. J. P. Callan, Z. Lu and W. Bruce Croft. Searching Distributed Collections with Inference Networks . In E. A. Fox, P. Ingwersen and R. Fidel (editors), Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 21-28, Seattle, Washington, 1995. ACM Press.
5. Jamie Callan, Margaret Connell and Aiqun Du. Automatic discovery of language models for text databases. In Proceedings of the 1999 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pages 479-490. ACM Press, 1999.
6. Nicholas Eric Craswell. Methods for Distributed Information Retrieval. Ph.D. thesis, The Australian National University, 2001.
7. Nick Craswell, Peter Bailey and David Hawking. Server selection on the world wide web. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries, San Antonio, Texas, United States, pages 37-46. ACM Press, 2000.
8. Daryl J. D'Souza, James A. Thom and Justin Zobel. A comparison of techniques for selecting text collections. In Proceedings of the 11th Australasian Database Conference(ADC'2000), pages 28-32, Canberra, Australia, 2000.
9. F. Esposito, S. Ferelli, N. Fanizzi and G. Semeraro. Learning from parsed sentences with INTHELEX. In Claire Cardie, Walter Daelemans, Claire Ńedellec and Erik Tjong Kim Sang (editors), Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning and of the Second Learning Language in Logic Workshop, Lisbon, 2000, pages 194-198. Association for Computational Linguistics, Somerset, New Jersey, 2000.
10. D. Faure and C. N'edellec. A corpus-based conceptual clustering method for verb frames and ontology acquisition. In In LREC workshop on Adapting lexical and corpus resources to sublanguages and applications, Grana da, Spain, 1998.
11. James C. French, Allison L. Powell, James P. Callan, Charles L. Viles, Travis Emmitt, Kevin J. Prey and Yun Mou. Comparing the performance of database selection algorithms. In Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 238-245, 1999.
12. Fabien Gandon. Agents handling annotation distribution in a corporate semantic web. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems, IOS Press, Volume 1, Number 1, pages 23-46, 2003.
13. Luis Gravano and H́ector Garćia-Molina. Generalizing GlOSS to vector-space databases and broker hierarchies. In International Conference on Very Large Databases, VLDB, pages 78-89, 1995.
14. Luis Gravano, H́ector Garćia-Molina and Anthony Tomasic. GlOSS: text-source discovery over the Internet. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Volume 24, Number 2, pages 229-264, 1999.
15. David Hawking and Paul Thistlewaite. Methods for information server selection. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Volume 17, Number 1, pages 40-76, 1999.
16. David Hawking and Paul Thomas. Server selection methods in hybrid portal search. In SIGIR '05: Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 75-82, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
17. Xiaohui Tao Richi Nayak John D. King, Yuefeng Li. Mining world knowledge for analysis of search engine content. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems: An International Journal, October 2007. Accepted for publication in September 2006.
18. Joerg-Uwe Kietz, Alexander Maedche and Raphael Volz. A method for semi-automatic ontology acquisition from a corporate intranet. In Proceedings of EKAW-2000 Workshop "Ontologies and Text", Juan-Les-Pins, France, October 2000, number 1937 in Springer Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI), 2000.
19. John D. King. Deep web collection selection. Master's thesis, School of Software Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, 2003.
20. John D King. Large scale analysis of search engine content. In The Fourth International Conference on Active Media Technology, Brisbane, Australia, Volume 1, page 451 to 453, 2006.
21. John D. King and Yuefeng Li. Web based collection selection using singular value decomposition. In IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'03), pages 104-110, Halifax, Canada, 2003.
22. Y. Li and N. Zhong. Capturing evolving patterns for ontology-based web mining. In IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, pages 256-263, Beijing, China, 2004.
23. Y. Li and N. Zhong. Mining ontology for automatically acquiring web user information needs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Volume 18, Number 4, pages 554-568, 2006.
24. King-Lup Liu, Clement T. Yu andWeiyi Meng. Discovering the representative of a search engine. In CIKM, pages 652-654, 2002.
25. Z. Lu, J.P. Callan and W.B. Croft. Applying inference networks to multiple collection searching. Technical Report TR96-42, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Department of Computer Science, 1996.
26. A Maedche and S Staab. Ontology learning for the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Volume 16(2), pages 72-79, 2001.
27. Alexander Maedche and Steffen Staab. Discovering conceptual relations from text. InW. Horn (editor), Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pages 321-325, 2000.
28. Alexander Maedche and Steffen Staab. Learning ontologies for the semantic web. In SemWeb, 2001.
29. Weiyi Meng, King-Lup Liu, Clement T. Yu, Wensheng Wu and Naphtali Rishe. Estimating the usefulness of search engines. 15th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'99), Volume 1, pages 146-153, 1999.
30. Milad Shokouhi, Justin Zobel, Falk Scholer and S. M. M. Tahaghoghi. Capturing collection size for distributed non-cooperative retrieval. In SIGIR '06: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 316-323, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press.
31. L. Si and J. Callan. Relevant document distribution estimation method for resource selection, 2003.
32. Luo Si and Jamie Callan. Modeling search engine effectiveness for federated search. In SIGIR, pages 83-90, 2005.
33. Nenad Stojanovic. Information-need driven query refinement. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems, IOS Press, Volume 3, Number 3, pages 155-170, 2005.
34. H. Suryanto and P. Compton. Learning classification taxonomies from a classification knowledge based system. In C. Nedellec P. Wiemer-Hastings S. Staab, A. Maedche (editor), Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology Learning, 14 Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'00), Berlin, 2000. Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'00).
35. Jason Chaffee Susan Gauch and Alexander Pretschner. Ontology-based personalized search and browsing. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems, IOS Press, Volume 1, Number 3, pages 219-234, 2003.
36. Xiaohui Tao, John D King and Yuefeng Li. Information fusion with subject-based information gathering method for intelligent multi-agent models. In The Seventh International Conference on Information Integration and Web-Based Applications and Services, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Volume 2, page 861 to 869. iiWAS, 2005.