Investigating new advances in forest species classification: Establishing a baseline

American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing - Annual Conference of the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2006: Prospecting for Geospatial Information Integration

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 1125-1136

  Quackenbush, Lindi J ^a   Ke, Yinghai ^a   Kroll, Charles N ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE METHODS; CLASSIFICATION METHODOLOGIES; CLASSIFICATION SCHEME; CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUE; CRITICAL INFORMATION; DATA LAYER; DATA SETS; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; ENHANCED THEMATIC MAPPER PLUS (ETM+); FOREST CLASSIFICATION; FOREST INVENTORY; FOREST MANAGERS; FOREST SPECIES; HIGH SPATIAL RESOLUTION IMAGES; IMAGE DATA; INFORMATION SOURCES; INVENTORY DATA; LANDSAT; LANDSAT ETM; LANDSAT IMAGERY; MULTI-TEMPORAL; NEW YORK; PROJECT PLANS; REMOTELY SENSED DATA; RULE-BASED APPROACH; RULE-BASED CLASSIFIER; SPATIAL RESOLUTION IMAGERY; SUPERVISED CLASSIFIERS; TOPOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; TOPOGRAPHIC INDEX; TOPOGRAPHIC MODELS;

FORESTRY; IMAGE RESOLUTION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SCIENCE; OPTICAL RADAR; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84869025366     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Aicher, R. P., and W. M. Stiteler, 2004. Use of the regression tree classification and forest inventory data to predict forest types. Proceedings, 2004 ASPRS Conference, Denver, Colorado, 24-28 May.
2. Anderson, J.R., E.E. Hardy, J.T. Roach, and R.E. Witmer, 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. United States Government Printing Office, Washington 41 p.
3. Dong, Y. and J. A. Richards, 1995. Forest discrimination using SAR multifrequency and multipolarization data. Proceedings of International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Firenze, Italy, 10-14 July: 616- 618.
4. Dowling, R., and A. Accad, 2003. Vegetation classification of the riparian zone along the Brisbane River, Queensland, Australia, using light detection and ranging (lidar) and forward looking digital video. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(5): 556-563.
5. Gillespie, A.J.R., 1998. Pros and Cons of Continuous Forest Inventory: Customer perspectives, integrated tools for natural resources inventories in the 21st Century Conference, August, Boise, Idaho, accessed at http://www.fia.fs. fed.us/library/procon.htm.
6. Hodgson, M. E., J. R. Jensen, J. A. Tullis, K. D. Riordan, and C. M. Archer, 2003. Synergistic use of lidar and color aerial photography for mapping urban parcel imperviousness. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69(9): 973-980.
7. Leckie, D. G., 1998. Forestry applications using imaging radar; in: Principles and Applications of Imaging Radar: Manual of Remote Sensing, 3rd Edition, Volume 2, edited by F.M. Henderson and A.J. Lewis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
8. Leckie, D., F. Gougeon, D. Hill, R. Quinn, L. Armstrong, and R. Shreenan, 2003. Combined high-density lidar and multispectral imagery for individual tree crown analysis. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(5): 633- 649.
9. Mickelson, J.G., D.L. Civco, and J.A. Silander, 1998. Delineating forest canopy species in the northeastern United States using multi-temporal TM Imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 64(9): 891- 904.
10. Myeong, S., P. F. Hopkins, R. H. Brock, and D. J. Nowak, 2001. Urban cover classification using digital, high resolution aerial imagery, Proceedings 2001 ASPRS Conference, St. Louis, Missouri, 23-26 April.
11. Puzzolo, V., F. De Natale and F. Giannetti, 2003. Forest species discrimination in an alpine mountain area using a fuzzy classification of multi-temporal SPOT (HRV) data. Proceedings of International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Toulouse, France, 21-25 July: 2538-2540.
12. Quackenbush, L. J., P. F. Hopkins, and G. J. Kinn, 2000. Developing forestry products from high resolution digital aerial imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66(11): 1337-1346.
13. Pugh, M.L., 2005. Forest Terrain Feature Characterization using multi-sensor neural image fusion and feature extraction methods. Ph.D. Dissertation, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry. 215 p.
14. Rignot, E. J. M., C. L. Williams, J. Way, and L. A. Viereck, 1994. Mapping of forest types in Alaskan boreal forests using SAR imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32(5): 1051-1058.
15. Riordan, K. D., 2003. A statistical examination of various high spatial resolution remote sensing datasets and algorithms for the mitigation of shadow effects in land cover identification. M.S. Thesis, University of South Carolina. 106 p.
16. Stehman, S.V., 1997. Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 62(1): 77-89.
17. Szymanski, D. L., 2002. An evidence gathering and assessment technique designed for a forest cover classification based on the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Ph.D. Dissertation, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry. 135 p.
18. Volden, E., A. S. Solberg, and R. B Huseby, 1998. Forest classification using spectrometer and SAR data. Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Seattle, WA, 6-10 July: 2732-2736.
19. Zhu, C., 2003. Data fusion approach to improve forest cover classification using SAR imagery. Ph.D. Dissertation, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry. 135 p.