It Is Only New Because It Has Been Missing for so Long: Indigenous Evaluation Capacity Building

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 566-582

  Anderson, Clara ^a   Chase, Malinda ^a   Johnson III, James ^a   Mekiana, Debbie ^a   McIntyre, Drena ^a   Ruerup, Amelia ^a   Kerr, Sandy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Alaska native; cross cultural; indigenous; learning; Maori capacity building; teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869016675     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: 15570878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1098214012449686     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Adams J.,Dickinson P.Evaluation training to build capacity in the community and public health workforce.American Journal of Evaluation. 2010;31:421-433.
2. Aruskevich K.Telling a story about indigenous evaluation: Insights of practitioners from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. 2010:.
3. Davidson E.Evaluation methodology basics: The nuts and bolts of sound evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005:.
4. LaFrance J.Culturally competent evaluation in Indian country.New Directions for Evaluation. 2004;102:39-50.
5. LaFrance J.,Nichols RIndigenous evaluation framework: Telling our story in our place and time. Alexandria, VA: American Indian Higher Education Consortium; 2007:.
6. Moewaka BarnesH. (2009). The evaluation hikoi: A Maori overview of programme evaluation. [Te Ropu Whariki]. Retrieved May 20, 2011, fromhttp://www.shore.ac.nz/publications/Maori%20Evaluation%20Manual%2009.pdf.
7. Wehipeihana N.Indigenous evaluation: A journey beyond participatory and collaborative approaches in evaluation. 2008:8-12.
8. Woorama. (2006, 11 July). Linear vs circular logic: Conflict between indigenous and non-indigenous logic systems. [Aboriginal Rights by suite101]. Retrieved May 20, 2011, fromhttp://aboriginalrights.suite101.com/article.cfm/linear_vs_circular_logic#ixzz1MqsnB6nx.