Environmental adaptation contributes to gene polymorphism across the arabidopsis thaliana genome

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 3721-3728

  Lee, Cheng Ruei ^a   Mitchell Olds, Thomas ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; environment; genetic variation; genome wide polymorphism

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; BALANCING SELECTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA POLYMORPHISM; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENOME; POPULATION STRUCTURE;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ARABIDOPSIS; ENVIRONMENT; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOME, PLANT; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC;

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 84869003100     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mss174     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Anderson JT, Lee C-R, Rushworth C, Colautti RI, Mitchell-Olds T. 2012. Genetic trade-offs and conditional neutrality contribute to local adaptation. Mol Ecol. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05522.x.
2. Anderson JT, Willis JH, Mitchell-Olds T. 2011. Evolutionary genetics of plant adaptation. Trends Genet. 27:258-266.
3. Andolfatto P, Wong KM, Bachtrog D. 2011. Effective population size and the efficacy of selection on the X chromosomes of two closely related Drosophila species. Genome Biol Evol. 3:114-128.
4. Bachtrog D, Charlesworth B. 2002. Reduced adaptation of a non-recombining neo-Y chromosome. Nature 416:323-326.
5. Balkenhol N, Waits LP, Dezzani RJ. 2009. Statistical approaches in landscape genetics: an evaluation of methods for linking landscape and genetic data. Ecography 32:818-830.
6. Barrett RD, Hoekstra HE. 2011. Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level. Nat Rev Genet. 12:767-780.
7. Berardini TZ, Mundodi S, Reiser L, et al. (18 co-authors). 2004. Functional annotation of the Arabidopsis genome using controlled vocabularies. Plant Physiol. 135:745-755.
8. Cao J, Schneeberger K, Ossowski S, et al. (17 co-authors). 2011. Whole-genome sequencing of multiple Arabidopsis thaliana populations. Nat Genet. 43:956-963.
9. Colautti RI, Lee C-R, Mitchell-Olds T. 2012. Origin, fate, and architecture of ecologically relevant genetic variation. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 15: 199-204.
10. Colbourne JK, Pfrender ME, Gilbert D, et al. (69 co-authors). 2011. The ecoresponsive genome of Daphnia pulex. Science 331:555-561.
11. Comeron JM, Kreitman M, Aguade M. 1999. Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. Genetics 151:239-249.
12. Eckert AJ, Bower AD, Gonzalez-Martinez SC,Wegrzyn JL, Coop G, Neale DB. 2010. Back to nature: ecological genomics of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda, Pinaceae). Mol Ecol. 19:3789-3805.
13. Eckert AJ, van Heerwaarden J, Wegrzyn JL, Nelson CD, Ross-Ibarra J, Gonzalez-Martinez SC, Neale DB. 2010. Patterns of population structure and environmental associations to aridity across the range of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L., Pinaceae). Genetics 185: 969-982.
14. Filiault DL, Maloof JN. 2012. A genome-wide association study identifies variants underlying the Arabidopsis thaliana shade avoidance response. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002589.
15. Flowers JM, Molina J, Rubinstein S, Huang P, Schaal BA, PuruggananMD. 2012. Natural selection in gene-dense regions shapes the genomic pattern of polymorphism in wild and domesticated rice. Mol Biol Evol. 29:675-687.
16. Fournier-Level A, Korte A, Cooper MD, Nordborg M, Schmitt J, Wilczek AM. 2011. Amap of local adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 334:86-89.
17. Gaut B. 2012. Arabidopsis thaliana as a model for the genetics of local adaptation. Nat Genet. 44:115-116.
18. Gillespie JH, Langley CH. 1974. A genera model to account for enzyme variation in natural populations. Genetics 76:837-848.
19. Hall MC, Lowry DB, Willis JH. 2010. Is local adaptation in Mimulus guttatus caused by trade-offs at individual loci? Mol Ecol. 19: 2739-2753.
20. Hancock AM, Brachi B, Faure N, Horton MW, Jarymowycz LB, Sperone FG, Toomajian C, Roux F, Bergelson J. 2011. Adaptation to climate across the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Science 334:83-86.
21. Hancock AM, Witonsky DB, Ehler E, et al. (11 co-authors). 2010. Human adaptations to diet, subsistence, and ecoregion are due to subtle shifts in allele frequency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:8924-8930.
22. Hedrick PW. 1986. Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments: a decade later. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 17:535-566.
23. Hedrick PW. 2006. Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments: the age of genomics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 37:67-93.
24. Hershberg R, Petrov DA. 2008. Selection on codon bias. Annu Rev Genet. 42:287-299.
25. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 25: 1965-1978.
26. Kunstner A, Nabholz B, Ellegren H. 2011. Significant selective constraint at 4-fold degenerate sites in the avian genome and its consequence for detection of positive selection. Genome Biol Evol. 3:1381-1389.
27. Lee C-R, Mitchell-Olds T. 2011. Quantifying effects of environmental and geographical factors on patterns of genetic differentiation. Mol Ecol. 20:4631-4642.
28. Legendre P, Fortin M-J. 2010. Comparison of the Mantel test and alternative approaches for detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data. Mol Ecol Resour. 10:831-844.
29. Lercher MJ, Hurst LD. 2002. Human SNP variability and mutation rate are higher in regions of high recombination. Trends Genet. 18: 337-340.
30. Manel S, Segelbacher G. 2009. Perspectives and challenges in landscape genetics. Mol Ecol. 18:1821-1822.
31. Mitchell-Olds T. 2001. Arabidopsis thaliana and its wild relatives: a model system for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 16: 693-700.
32. Mitchell-Olds T, Willis JH, Goldstein DB. 2007. Which evolutionary processes influence natural genetic variation for phenotypic traits? Nat Rev Genet. 8:845-856.
33. Pal C, Papp B, Hurst LD. 2001. Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics 158:927-931.
34. Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D. 2006. Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet. 2:e190.
35. Pena-Castillo L, Hughes TR. 2007. Why are there still over 1000 uncharacterized yeast genes? Genetics 176:7-14.
36. Pritchard JK, Pickrell JK, Coop G. 2010. The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation. Curr Biol. 20:R208-R215.
37. Rockman MV. 2012. The QTN program and the alleles that matter for evolution: all that's gold does not glitter. Evolution 66:1-17.
38. Rushworth CA, Song B-H, Lee C-R, Mitchell-Olds T. 2011. Boechera, a model system for ecological genomics. Mol Ecol. 20:4843-4857.
39. Stajich JE, Block D, Boulez K, et al. (21 co-authors). 2002. The Bioperl toolkit: Perl modules for the life sciences. Genome Res. 12:1611-1618.
40. Stajich JE, Hahn MW. 2005. Disentangling the effects of demography and selection in human history. Mol Biol Evol. 22:63-73.
41. Storfer A, Murphy MA, Spear SF, Holderegger R, Waits LP. 2010. Landscape genetics: where are we now? Mol Ecol 19:3496-3514.
42. Weigel D. 2012. Natural variation in Arabidopsis: from molecular genetics to ecological genomics. Plant Physiol. 158:2-22.
43. Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1586-1591.
44. Yang L, Gaut BS. 2011. Factors that contribute to variation in evolutionary rate among Arabidopsis genes. Mol Biol Evol. 28:2359-2369.