Seismic response analyses for the silicon valley rapid transit project

Geotechnical Special Publication

Volumn , Issue 181, 2008, Pages

  Chiu, Peter ^a   Pradel, Daniel E ^a   Kwok, Annie On Lei ^a   Stewart, Jonathan P ^b  

^a Praad Geotechnical Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLIFICATION FACTORS; CRITICAL ISSUES; DESIGN INPUT; EQUIVALENT-LINEAR; GROUND RESPONSE; HIGHLY SENSITIVE; LARGE AMPLITUDE; LARGE STRAINS; MODULUS REDUCTION; NONLINEAR CODES; SEISMIC GROUND; SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SILICON VALLEY; SMALL STRAINS; SOIL COLUMN; SOIL TYPES; STRESS-STRAIN; TRANSIT PROJECTS;

AMPLIFICATION; CIVIL ENGINEERING; DYNAMICS; EARTHQUAKES; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING; LANDFORMS; RAILROAD TRACKS; RAPID TRANSIT; SHEAR STRAIN; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS; SOILS; STRATIGRAPHY;

GEOLOGIC MODELS;

EID: 84868944501     PISSN: 08950563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1061/40975(318)210     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP9), San Francisco, California: Millpress. 8 p.
2. Bommer, J.J. and Alarcon, J.E. (2006). "The Prediction and Use of Peak Ground Velocity," Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 10(1), 1-31.
3. Choi, Y. and Stewart, J.P. (2005). "Nonlinear site amplification as function of 30 m shear wave velocity," Earthquake Spectra, 21 (1), 1-30.
4. Darendeli (2001). "Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves," Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX.
5. Hashash, Y.M.A. and Park, D. (2001). "Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment." Engrg. Geology, 62(1-3), 185-206.
6. Hashash, Y.M.A. and Park, D. (2002). "Viscous damping formulation and high frequency motion propagation in nonlinear site response analysis." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engrg., 22(7), 611-624.
7. Park, D. and Hashash, Y. M. A. (2004). "Soil damping formulation in nonlinear time domain site response analysis." J. of Earthquake Engrg., 8(2), 249-274.
8. Idriss, I.M. and Sun J.I. (1992). SHAKE91: A computer program for conduction equivalent-linear seismic response analyses of horizontally layered soil deposits, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Univ. of California, Davis.
9. Ishihara, K. (1981). "Strength of Cohesive Soils Under Transient and Cyclic Loading Conditions," State-of-the-Art in Earthquake Engineering, 154-169.
10. Kramer, S.L. and S.B. Paulsen (2004). "Practical use of geotechnical site response models," Proc. Int. Workshop on Uncertainties in Nonlinear Soil Properties and their Impact on Modeling Dynamic Soil Response, PEER Center Headquarters, Richmond, CA.
11. nd Terzaghi Lecture." Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 117(4), 537-615.
12. nd Int. Congress on Applied Mechanics, Zurich.
13. ShakeEdit Software (2007), SHAKE2000, Version 3.0.0. Lacey, WA.
14. Sheahan, T.C., Ladd, C.C. and Germaine, J.T. (1996). "Rate-dependent undrained shear behavior of saturated clay." Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 122(2), 99-108.
15. th Decennial Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Conference, ASCE, Sacramento, CA.
16. Hsu, C. and Vucetic, M. (2002). "Dynamic and Cyclic Behavior of Soils over the Wide Range of Shear Strains in NGI-type Simple Shear Testing Devices," Research Report, Dept. of Civil Engineer, University of California, Los Angeles, ENG-02-228.
17. Weiler, W.A. (1988). "Small strain shear modulus of clay," Proceedings, ASCE Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II: Recent Advances in Ground Motion Evaluation, Geotechnical Special Publication 20, ASCE, New York, 331-335.