Emerging perspectives in the restoration of biodiversity-based ecosystem services

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 666-672

  Montoya, Daniel ^a,b   Rogers, Lucy ^c   Memmott, Jane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

^c Avon Wildlife Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; HABITAT RESTORATION; HABITAT TYPE; PEST CONTROL; POLLINATION; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SEED DISPERSAL;

ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOOD CHAIN; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; METHODOLOGY; PLANT; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; FOOD CHAIN; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANTS;

EID: 84868712798     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.004     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Normile D. UN Biodiversity Summit yields welcome and unexpected progress. Nature 2010, 330:742-743.
2. Assembly Rules and Restoration Ecology. Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice 2004, Island Press. V. Temperton (Ed.).
3. Foundations of Restoration Ecology 2006, Island Press. D.A. Falk (Ed.).
4. Cadotte M.W., et al. Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48:1079-1087.
5. Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective 2009, Oxford University Press. S. Naeem (Ed.).
6. Hegland S.J., et al. How to monitor ecological communities cost-efficiently: the example of plant-pollinator networks. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143:2092-2101.
7. Forup M.L., et al. The restoration of ecological interactions: plant-pollinator networks on ancient and restored heathlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45:742-752.
8. Montoya D., et al. Animal versus wind dispersal and the robustness of tree species to deforestation. Science 2008, 320:1502-1504.
9. O'Gorman E.J., et al. Loss of functionally unique species may gradually undermine ecosystems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2011, 278:1886-1893.
10. Hobbs R.J., et al. Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2006, 15:1-7.
11. Ewel J.J., Putz F.E. A place for alien species in ecosystem restoration. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2004, 2:354-360.
12. Funk J.L., et al. Restoration through reassembly: plant traits and invasion resistance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:695-703.
13. Griffiths C.J., et al. Resurrecting extinct interactions with extant substitutes. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:1-4.
14. Bascompte J., et al. Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 2006, 312:431-433.
15. Tylianakis J. Understanding the web of life: the birds, the bees, and sex with aliens. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:224-228.
16. Lopezaraiza-Mikel M., et al. The impact of an alien plant on a native plant-pollinator network: an experimental approach. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:539-550.
17. Christian C.E. Consequences of a biological invasion reveal the importance of mutualism for plant communities. Nature 2001, 413:635-639.
18. Nielsen A., Bascompte J. Ecological networks, nestedness, and sampling effort. J. Ecol. 2007, 95:1134-1141.
19. Gibson R.H., et al. Sampling methods influence the structure of plant-pollinator networks. Oikos 2011, 6:822-831.
20. Flynn D.F.B., et al. Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity: ecosystem-function relationships. Ecology 2011, 92:1573-1581.
21. Fukami T., et al. Assembly history dictates ecosystem functioning: evidence from wood descomposer communities. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:675-684.
22. Jiang L., et al. Species diversity, invasion, and alternative community states in sequentially assembled communities. Am. Nat. 2011, 178:411-418.
23. Verdú M.V., et al. Phylogenetic relatedness as a tool in restoration ecology: a meta-analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2012, 279:1761-1767.
24. Devoto M., et al. Understanding and planning ecological restoration of plant-pollinator networks. Ecol. Lett. 2012, 15:319-328.
25. Arroyo-Mora J.P., et al. Dynamics in landscape structure and composition for the Chorotega region, Costa Rica from 1960 to 2000. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2004, 106:27-39.
26. Society for Ecological Restoration International The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration 2004, Science & Policy Working Group, Society for Ecological Restoration International.
27. Rezende E.L., et al. Compartments in a marine food web associated with phylogeny, body mass, and habitat structure. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:779-788.
28. Macfadyen S., et al. Landscape structure influence modularity patterns in farm food webs: consequences for pest control. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21:516-524.
29. Olesen J.M., et al. The modularity of pollination networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:19891-19896.
30. Ruiz-Jaen M.C., Aide T.M. Restoration success: how is it being measured?. Restor. Ecol. 2005, 13:569-577.
31. Herrick J.E., et al. Monitoring ecological processes for restoration projects. J. Nat. Conserv. 2006, 14:161-171.
32. McCann K.S., et al. The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:513-523.
33. Tylianakis J.M., et al. Habitat modification alters the structure of tropical host-parasitoid food webs. Nature 2007, 445:202-205.
34. Shin Y.J., et al. Using size-based indicators to evaluate the ecosystem effects of fishing. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2005, 62:384-396.
35. Petchey O.L., Belgrano A. Body-size distributions and size-spectra: universal indicators of ecological status?. Biol. Lett. 2010, 6:434-437.
36. Cardinale B.J., et al. Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 2006, 443:989-992.
37. Hector A., Bagchi R. Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature 2007, 488:188-190.
38. Schuster S.C. Next-generation sequencing transforms today's biology. Nature 2008, 5:16-18.
39. Edwards R.A., et al. Using pyrosequencing to shed light on deep mine microbial ecology. BMC Genomics 2006, 7:1-13.
40. Sogin M.L., et al. Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the unexplored 'rare biosphere'. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:12115-12120.
41. Falkowski P.G., et al. The microbial engines that drive Earth's biogeochemical cycles. Science 2008, 320:1034-1039.
42. van der Heijden M.G.A., et al. The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:296-310.
43. Nicol S., Possingham H.P. Should metapopulation restoration strategies increase patch area of number of patches?. Ecol. Appl. 2010, 20:566-581.
44. Holyoak M., et al. Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities 2005, University of Chicago.
45. Purves D.W., Dushoff J. Directed seed dispersal and metapopulation response to habitat loss and disturbance: application to Eichhornia paniculata. J. Ecol. 2005, 93:658-669.
46. Brose U., et al. Unified spatial scaling of species and their trophic interactions. Nature 2004, 428:167-171.
47. Bullock J.M., et al. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:541-549.
48. Lundberg J., Moberg F. Mobile link organisms and ecosystem functioning: implications for ecosystem resilience and management. Ecosystems 2003, 6:87-98.
49. Staddon P., et al. Connectivity, non-random extinction and ecosystem function in experimental metacommunities. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:543-552.
50. Kremen C., et al. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:229-314.
51. Rooney N., et al. A landscape theory for food web architecture. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:867-881.
52. Collinge S.K., et al. Long-term dynamics of biotic and abiotic resistance to exotic species invasion in restored vernal pool plant communities. Ecology 2011, 21:2105-2118.
53. Scherber C., et al. Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature 2010, 468:553-556.
54. Doherty J.M., et al. Diversity-function relationships changed in a long-term restoration experiment. Ecology 2011, 21:2143-2155.
55. Koch J.M., Hobbs R.J. Synthesis: is Alcoa successfully restoring a jarrah forest ecosystem after bauxite mining in Western Australia?. Restor. Ecol. 2007, 15:137-144.
56. Tropek R., et al. Spontaneous succession in limestone quarries as an effective restoration tool for endangered arthropods and plants. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 47:139-148.
57. Pfisterer A.B., Schmid B. Diversity-dependent production can decrease the stability of ecosystem functioning. Nature 2002, 416:84-86.
58. Rey-Benayas J.M., et al. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration. Science 2009, 325:1121-1124.
59. Partap U.M.A., et al. Pollination failure in apple crop and farmers' management strategies in Hengduan mountains, China. Acta Hortic. 2001, 561:225-230.
60. The New Economy of Nature: The Quest to Make Conservation Profitable 2002, Island Press. G. Daily, K. Ellison (Eds.).
61. Tylianakis J.M., et al. Conservation of species interaction networks. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143:2270-2279.
62. Thomas C.D., et al. Short-term studies underestimate 30-generation changes in a butterfly metapopulation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 269:563-569.
63. Thornton I.W.B., et al. How important were stepping stones in the colonization of Krakatau?. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2002, 77:275-317.
64. Burgos E., et al. Why nestedness in mutualistic networks?. J. Theor. Biol. 2007, 249:307-313.