Phase diagram of the modified Lennard-Jones system

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 137, Issue 17, 2012, Pages

  Asano, Yuta ^a   Fuchizaki, Kazuhiro ^a  

^a EHIME UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOLTZMANN CONSTANTS; CRITICAL POINTS; EQUILIBRIUM CALCULATION; LENGTH SCALE; LENNARD-JONES PARAMETERS; LENNARD-JONES SYSTEMS; NONEQUILIBRIUM PROBLEMS; TRIPLE POINTS;

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PHYSICS;

PHASE DIAGRAMS;

EID: 84868679087     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.4764855     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. For example, see M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Clarendon, Oxford, 1987).
2. B. J. Alder and T. E. Wainwright, Phys. Rev. 127, 359 (1962). 10.1103/PhysRev.127.359
3. R. W. Zwanzig, J. Chem. Phys. 22, 1420 (1954); 10.1063/1.1740193
4. J. A. Barker and D. Henderson, J. Chem. Phys. 47, 4714 (1967); 10.1063/1.1701689
5. J. D. Weeks, D. Chandler, and H. C. Andersen, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 5237 (1971). 10.1063/1.1674820
6. K. Fuchizaki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79, 024004 (2010). 10.1143/JPSJ.79. 024004
7. W. Kob, C. Donati, S. J. Plimton, P. H. Poole, and S. C. Glotzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2827 (1997); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2827
8. R. Yamamoto and A. Onuki, Phys. Rev. E 58, 3515 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.3515
9. 3, which, although curved, is a finite manifold. See J. M. Caillol, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 4885 (1998). 10.1063/1.477099
10. K. Fuchizaki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63, 4051 (1994); 10.1143/JPSJ.63.4051
11. D. C. Rapaport, The Art of Molecular Dynamics Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2004), p. 344.
12. L. Greengard, The Rapid Evaluation of Potential Fields in Particle Systems (MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1987).
13. c 2.5σ. Note that the mLJ system is not thermodynamically equivalent to the original LJ system. 10.1063/1.445633
14. J.-P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald, Theory of Simple Liquids, 2nd ed. (Academic, London, 1986), p. 6.
15. See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4764855 E-JCPSA6-137-026242 for numerical details.
16. M. de Koning, A. Antonelli, and S. Yip, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3973 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3973
17. Y. Asano and K. Fuchizaki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 055002 (2009). 10.1143/JPSJ.78.055002
18. L. V. Woodcock, Chem. Phys. Lett. 10, 257 (1971). 10.1016/0009-2614(71) 80281-6
19. H. C. Andersen, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 2384 (1980). 10.1063/1.439486
20. See, for example, M. J. Romanelli, Mathematical Methods for Digital Computer (Wiley, New York, 1967), Vol. 2, pp. 110-120.
21. A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, Mol. Phys. 61, 813 (1987). 10.1080/ 00268978700101491
22. K. Fuchizaki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, 024003 (2011). 10.1143/JPSJ.80. 024003
23. We found after submission that H. Watanabe, N. Ito, and C.-K. Hu, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 204102 (2012), investigated the critical behavior of a similar system, employing a huge-scale isothermal-isochoric MD simulations. 10.1063/1.4720089
24. B. Smit and D. Frenkel, Mol. Phys. 68, 931 (1989). 10.1080/ 00268978900102641
25. B. Widom, J. Chem. Phys. 39, 2808 (1963). 10.1063/1.1734110
26. c is the critical temperature. See J. S. Rowlinson and B. Widom, Molecular Theory of Capillarity (Dover, New York, 2002), p. 249.
27. A. Ahmed and R. J. Sadus, J. Chem. Phys. 133, 124515 (2010). 10.1063/1.3481102
28. J.-P. Hansen and L. Verlet, Phys. Rev. 184, 151 (1969). 10.1103/PhysRev.184.151
29. A. Ahmed and R. J. Sadus, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 174504 (2009). 10.1063/1.3253686
30. B. Smit, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 8639 (1992). 10.1063/1.462271
31. K. K. Mon, and K. Binder, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 6989 (1992); 10.1063/1.462557
32. J. R. Recht and A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, Mol. Phys. 80, 843 (1993). 10.1080/00268979300102701
33. H. Okumura and F. Yonezawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 70, 1990 (2001). 10.1143/JPSJ.70.1990
34. J. Pérez-Pellitero, P. Ungerer, G. Orkoukas, and A. D. Mackie, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 054515 (2006). 10.1063/1.2227027
35. I. Szalai, J. Liszi, and D. Boda, Chem. Phys. Lett. 246, 214 (1995). 10.1016/0009-2614(95)01100-N
36. J. E. Hunter and W. P. Reinhardt, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8627 (1995). 10.1063/1.470121
37. S. D. Stoddard and J. Ford, Phys. Rev. A 8, 1504 (1973). 10.1103/PhysRevA.8.1504
38. K. Binder, Z. Phys. B 43, 119 (1981). 10.1007/BF01293604
39. N. B. Wilding, Annual Review of Computational Physics IV, edited by, D. Stauffer, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996).
40. F. A. Lindemann, Phys. Z. 11, 609 (1910);
41. F. E. Simon and G. Z. Glatzel, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 178, 309 (1929); 10.1002/zaac.19291780123
42. M. Ross, Phys. Rev. 184, 233 (1969); 10.1103/PhysRev.184.233
43. R. K. Crawford and W. B. Daniels, J. Chem. Phys. 55, 5651 (1971). 10.1063/1.1675734
44. M. A. van der Hoef, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 8142 (2000). 10.1063/1.1314342
45. Finite-size and potential-cutoff effects on the melting point of the LJ system were systematically investigated by E. A. Mastny and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 104504 (2007). They tried to identify the melting curve for the infinite-size and full-potential LJ systems. Reference supports their findings about the cutoff size that can emulate the behavior derivable from the full potential, but contradicts their findings about the dependence of the melting curve on the size. 10.1063/1.2753149
46. Z. H. Jin, P. Gumbsch, K. Lu, and E. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 055703 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.055703
47. S. Toxvaerd and J. C. Dyre, J. Chem. Phys. 134, 081102 (2011). 10.1063/1.3558787