Comparison of walking overground and in a Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN) in individuals with and without transtibial amputation

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Gates, Deanna H ^a   Darter, Benjamin J ^a,b   Dingwell, Jonathan B ^c   Wilken, Jason M ^a  

^a BROOKE ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Kinematics; Rehabilitation; Treadmill; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOINT; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; LEG; MALE; MOTION; PELVIS; PHYSICAL EDUCATION; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THORAX; TIBIA; WALKING;

ADULT; AMPUTATION; BIOMECHANICS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINTS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MALE; MOTION; PELVIS; PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; THORAX; TIBIA; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WALKING; YOUNG ADULT;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84868677147     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-81     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Gait training with virtual reality-based real-time feedback: improving gait performance following transfemoral amputation. Darter BJ, Wilken JM, Phys Ther 2011 91 9 1385 1394 10.2522/ptj.20100360 21757579
2. Schmidt RA, Lee T, Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 5th 2011
3. Some fundamental aspects of the biomechanics of overground versus treadmill locomotion. van Ingen Schenau GJ, Med Sci Sports Exerc 1980 12 4 257 261 7421475 (Pubitemid 11196494)
4. Changes in knee function associated with treadmill ambulation. Strathy GM, Chao EY, Laughman RK, J Biomech 1983 16 7 517 522 10.1016/0021-9290(83) 90066-0 6619169 (Pubitemid 13020205)
5. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Riley PO, Paolini G, Della U, Croce K, Paylo W, Kerrigan DC, Gait Posture 2007 26 1 17 24 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.003 16905322 (Pubitemid 46617923)
6. Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill walking. White SC, Yack HJ, Tucker CA, Lin HY, Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998 30 10 1537 1542 10.1097/00005768-199810000-00011 9789855 (Pubitemid 28465520)
7. Energy cost of treadmill and floor walking at self-selected paces. Pearce ME, Cunningham DA, Donner AP, Rechnitzer PA, Fullerton GM, Howard JH, Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1983 52 1 115 119 10.1007/BF00429037 6686120 (Pubitemid 14245211)
8. Energy cost of walking measurements in subjects with lower limb amputations: a comparison study between floor and treadmill test. Traballesi M, Porcacchia P, Averna T, Brunelli S, Gait Posture 2008 27 1 70 75 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.01.006 17360186 (Pubitemid 350258620)
9. Hemiparetic gait parameters in overground versus treadmill walking. Harris-Love ML, Forrester LW, Macko RF, Silver KH, Smith GV, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2001 15 2 105 112 10.1177/154596830101500204 11811252 (Pubitemid 34031131)
10. Improved hemiparetic muscle activation in treadmill versus overground walking. Harris-Love ML, Macko RF, Whitall J, Forrester LW, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2004 18 3 154 160 10.1177/0888439004267678 15375275
11. Treadmill walking in old age may not reproduce the real life situation. Greig C, Butler F, Skelton D, Mahmud S, Young A, J Am Geriatr Soc 1993 41 1 15 18 8418117 (Pubitemid 23018044)
12. Familiarisation to treadmill walking in unimpaired older people. Wass E, Taylor NF, Matsas A, Gait Posture 2005 21 1 72 79 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.01.003 15536036 (Pubitemid 41569254)
13. Kinematic, kinetic and metabolic parameters of treadmill versus overground walking in healthy older adults. Parvataneni K, Ploeg L, Olney SJ, Brouwer B, Clin Biomech 2009 24 1 95 100 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.07.002
14. Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking. Dingwell JB, Cusumano JP, Cavanagh PR, Sternad D, J Biomech Eng 2001 123 1 27 32 10.1115/1.1336798 11277298 (Pubitemid 32202575)
15. Intra-stride belt-speed variation affects treadmill locomotion. Savelberg HH, Vorstenbosch MA, Kamman EH, van de Weijer JG, Schambardt HC, Gait Posture 1998 7 1 26 34 10.1016/S0966-6362(97)00023-4 10200372 (Pubitemid 28102780)
16. Knee joint kinematics from familiarised treadmill walking can be generalised to overground walking in young unimpaired subjects. Matsas A, Taylor N, McBurney H, Gait Posture 2000 11 1 46 53 10.1016/S0966-6362(99)00048-X 10664485 (Pubitemid 30069485)
17. Treadmill versus walkway locomotion in humans: an EMG study. Arsenault AB, Winter DA, Marteniuk RG, Ergon 1986 29 5 665 676 10.1080/00140138608968301 (Pubitemid 16117533)
18. Modulation of walking speed by changing optic flow in persons with stroke. Lamontagne A, Fung J, McFadyen BJ, Faubert J, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007 4 22 10.1186/1743-0003-4-22 17594501 (Pubitemid 47038004)
19. Visual influence on human locomotion. Modulation to changes in optic flow. Prokop T, Schubert M, Berger W, Exp Brain Res 1997 114 1 63 70 10.1007/PL00005624 9125452 (Pubitemid 27153528)
20. The utility of a virtual reality locomotion interface for studying gait behavior. Sheik-Nainar MA, Kaber DB, Hum Factors 2007 49 4 696 709 10.1518/001872007X215773 17702221 (Pubitemid 47122698)
21. Unintentional modulations of human gait by optical flow. Pailhous J, Ferrandez AM, Fluckiger M, Baumberger B, Behav Brain Res 1990 38 3 275 281 10.1016/0166-4328(90)90181-D 2363843 (Pubitemid 20180254)
22. The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait. Waters RL, Mulroy S, Gait Posture 1999 9 3 207 231 10.1016/S0966-6362(99)00009-0 10575082 (Pubitemid 29320143)
23. Comparison of below-knee amputee gait performed overground and on a motorized treadmill. Button C, Moyle S, Davids K, Adapt Phys Activ Q 2010 27 2 96 112 20440022
24. Lower limb kinematic and kinetic differences between transtibial amputee fallers and non-fallers. Vanicek N, Strike SC, McNaughton L, Polman R, Prosthet Orthot Int 2010 34 4 399 410 10.3109/03093646.2010.480964 20450461
25. Postural sway in amputees and normal subjects. Fernie GR, Holliday PJ, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978 60 7 895 898 701337
26. Reliability and minimal detectible change values for gait kinematics and kinetics in healthy adults. Wilken JM, Rodriguez KM, Brawner M, Darter BJ, Gait Posture 2012 35 2 301 307 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.09.105 22041096
27. A six degrees-of-freedom marker set for gait analysis: repeatability and comparison with a modified Helen Hayes set. Collins TD, Ghoussayni SN, Ewins DJ, Kent JA, Gait Posture 2009 30 2 173 180 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.04.004 19473844
28. Froude and the contribution of naval architecture to our understanding of bipedal locomotion. Vaughan CL, O'Malley MJ, Gait Posture 2005 21 3 350 362 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.01.011 15760752 (Pubitemid 41583200)
29. Walking variability during continuous pseudo-random oscillations of the support surface and visual field. McAndrew PM, Dingwell JB, Wilken JM, J Biomech 2010 43 8 1470 1475 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.003 20346453
30. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion-Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. Wu G, van der Helm FC, Veeger HE, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C, Nagels J, Karduna AR, McQuade K, Wang X, Werner FW, Buchholz B, J Biomech 2005 38 5 981 992 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042 15844264 (Pubitemid 40431439)
31. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion-part I: ankle, hip, and spine. Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, Whittle M, D'Lima DD, Cristofolini L, Witte H, Schmid O, Stokes I, J Biomech 2002 35 4 543 548 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00222-6 11934426 (Pubitemid 34273649)
32. Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. Zeni JA Jr, Richards JG, Higginson JS, Gait Posture 2008 27 4 710 714 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.007 17723303 (Pubitemid 351469976)
33. Kinematic variability and local dynamic stability of upper body motions when walking at different speeds. Dingwell JB, Marin LC, J Biomech 2006 39 3 444 452 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.12.014 16389084 (Pubitemid 43028507)
34. Reliability and minimal detectible change values for gait kinematics and kinetics in healthy adults. Wilken J, Rodriguez K, Brawner M, Darter B, Gait Posture In Press
35. Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM, Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006 4 54 10.1186/1477-7525-4-54 16925807 (Pubitemid 44501757)
36. Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review. Sadeghi H, Allard P, Prince F, Labelle H, Gait Posture 2000 12 1 34 45 10.1016/S0966- 6362(00)00070-9 10996295
37. Gait analysis during treadmill and overground locomotion in children and adults. Stolze H, Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Mondwurf C, Boczek-Funcke A, Johnk K, Deuschl G, Illert M, Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997 105 6 490 497 10.1016/S0924-980X(97)00055-6 9448652 (Pubitemid 28020527)
38. Measures of frontal plane stability during treadmill and overground walking. Rosenblatt NJ, Grabiner MD, Gait Posture 2010 31 3 380 384 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.01.002 20129786
39. Kinematic variability, fractal dynamics and local dynamic stability of treadmill walking. Terrier P, Deriaz O, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011 8 12 10.1186/1743-0003-8-12 21345241
40. Self-motion perception during locomotor recalibration: more than meets the eye. Durgin FH, Pelah A, Fox LF, Lewis J, Kane R, Walley KA, J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2005 31 3 398 419 15982122 (Pubitemid 41017467)