The use of individual cut points from treadmill walking to assess free-living moderate to vigorous physical activity in obese subjects by accelerometry: Is it useful?

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 12, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Aadland, Eivind ^a   Steene Johannessen, Jostein ^a  

^a WESTERN NORWAY UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Accelerometer; Actigraph; Exercise; Individual calibration

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; EXERCISE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; OBESITY; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; RISK REDUCTION; WALKING;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; BODY MASS INDEX; EXERCISE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; OBESITY; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; RISK REDUCTION BEHAVIOR; WALKING;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84868675687     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-172     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Accelerometer profiles of physical activity and inactivity in normal weight, overweight, and obese US men and women. Tudor-Locke C, Brashear MM, Johnson WD, Katzmarzyk PT, IJBNPA 2010 7 60 1 11 20145731
2. Physical activity guidelines advisory committee report 2008. Part A: Executive Summary. US Department of Health and Human Services, Nutr Rev 2009 67 114 120 19178654
3. Assessing physical activity using wearable monitors: measures of physical activity. Butte NF, Ekelund U, Westerterp KR, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012 44 1S 5 12 22157774
4. Physical activity and public health: Updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Macera CA, Heath GW, Thompson PD, Bauman A, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007 39 1423 1434 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27 17762377
5. Principles of design and analyses for the calibration of accelerometry-based activity monitors. Welk GJ, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005 37 501 511 10.1249/01.mss.0000185660.38335.de 16294113
6. Validation of ActiReg (R) to measure physical activity and energy expenditure against doubly labelled water in obese persons. Hustvedt BE, Svendsen M, Lovo A, Ellegard L, Hallen J, Tonstad S, Br J Nutr 2008 100 219 226 18197993
7. Reliability and validity of the combined heart rate and movement sensor Actiheart. Brage S, Brage N, Franks PW, Ekelund U, Wareham NJ, Eur J Clin Nutr 2005 59 561 570 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602118 15714212
8. A statistics primer: validity and reliability. Greenfield MLVH, Kuhn JE, Wojtys EM, Am J Sports Med 1998 26 483 485 9617417
9. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005 37 531 S543 10.1249/01.mss.0000185657.86065.98 16294116
10. Technical reliability of the CSA activity monitor: the EarlyBird Study. Metcalf BS, Curnow JSH, Evans C, Voss LD, Wilkin TJ, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002 34 1533 1537 10.1097/00005768-200209000-00022 12218751
11. Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: a generalizability study. Welk GJ, Schaben JA, Morrow JR Jr, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004 36 1637 1645 15354049
12. Unit-specific calibration of Actigraph accelerometers in a mechanical setup-Is it worth the effort? The effect on random output variation caused by technical inter-instrument variability in the laboratory and in the field. Moeller NC, Korsholm L, Kristensen PL, Andersen LB, Wedderkopp N, Froberg K, BMC Med Res Methodol 2008 8 19 10.1186/1471-2288-8-19 18405353
13. Reliability and validity of the computer science and applications accelerometer in a mechanical setting. Brage S, Brage N, Wedderkopp N, Froberg K, Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 2003 7 101 119 10.1207/S15327841MPEE0702-4
14. Individual calibration for estimating free-living walking speed using the MTI monitor. Barnett A, Cerin E, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006 38 761 767 10.1249/01.mss.0000210206.55941.b2 16679994
15. Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations. Ward DS, Evenson KR, Vaughn A, Rodgers AB, Troiano RP, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005 37 582 S588 10.1249/01.mss.0000185292.71933.91 16294121
16. Accelerometer use with children, older adults, and adults with functional limitations. Strath SJ, Pfeiffer KA, Whitt-Glover MC, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012 44 77 S85 22157778
17. Effects of obesity and sex on the energetic cost and preferred speed of walking. Browning RC, Baker EA, Herron JA, Kram R, J Appl Physiol (Bethesda, Md: 1985) 2006 100 390 398 10.1152/japplphysiol.00767.2005
18. Metabolic cost, mechanical work, and efficiency during walking in young and older men. Mian OS, Thom JM, Ardigo LP, Narici MV, Minetti AE, Acta Physiol 2006 186 127 139 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01522.x
19. Effects of age and walking speed on coactivation and cost of walking in healthy adults. Peterson DS, Martin PE, Gait Posture 2010 31 355 359 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.12.005 20106666
20. Effects of body mass index and tilt angle on output of two wearable activity monitors. Feito Y, Bassett DR, Tyo B, Thompson DL, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011 43 861 866 20962689
21. Estimating absolute and relative physical activity intensity across age via accelerometry in adults. Miller NE, Strath SJ, Swartz AM, Cashin SE, J Aging Phys Act 2010 18 158 170 20440028
22. Actigraph and Actical physical activity monitors: a peek under the hood. John D, Frreedson P, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012 44 1S 86 S89 22157779
23. A practical system of units for the description of the heat exchange of man with his environment. Gagge AP, Burton AC, Bazett HC, Science 1941 94 428 430 10.1126/science.94.2445.428 17758307
24. New examination of the performance of the MetaMax I metabolic analyser with the Douglas-bag technique. Medbø JI, Mamen A, Resaland GK, Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2012 72 2 158 168 10.3109/00365513.2011.649013 22217323
25. Accelerometer test-retest reliability by data processing algorithms: results from the twin cities walking study. Sirard JR, Forsyth A, Oakes JM, Schmitz KH, JPAH 2011 8 668 674
26. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Bland JM, Altman DG, Lancet 1986 1 307 310 2868172
27. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. / Mesures de fiabilite en medecine du sport et science du sport. Hopkins WG, Sports Med 2000 30 1 15 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001 10907753
28. A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. Welk GJ, Blair SN, Wood K, Jones S, Thompson RW, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000 32 489 S497 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00008 10993419
29. Physical activity guidelines advisory committee, Physical activity guidelines advisory committee report 2008. Part D: Background Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services 2008
30. Assessment of physical activity-a review of methodologies with reference to epidemiological research: a report of the exercise physiology section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Warren JM, Ekelund U, Besson H, Mezzani A, Geladas N, Vanhees L, Experts P, Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2010 17 127 139 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32832ed875 20215971
31. Assessment of physical activity: a critical appraisal. Westerterp KR, Eur J Appl Physiol 2009 105 823 828 10.1007/s00421-009-1000-2 19205725
32. Physical activity assessment with accelerometers: an evaluation against doubly labeled water. Plasqui G, Westerterp KR, Obesity 2007 15 2371 2379 10.1038/oby.2007.281 17925461
33. The International Physical Activity Questionare [ http://www.ipaq.ki.se ] (assessed 2011.08.22).
34. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. SpA P, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Gorber SC, Tremblay M, IJBNPA 2008 5 56 56 18990237
35. Predictors of 6-minute walk test results in lean, obese and morbidly obese women. Hulens M, Vansant G, Claessens AL, Lysens R, Muls E, Scand J Med Sci Sports 2003 13 98 105 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.10273.x 12641641
36. Effect of monitor placement and of activity setting on the MTI accelerometer output. Yngve A, Nilsson A, Sjostrom M, Ekelund U, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003 35 320 326 10.1249/01.MSS.0000048829.75758.A0 12569223
37. Assessment of physical activity with the Computer Science and Applications, Inc., accelerometer: Laboratory versus field validation. Nichols JF, Morgan CG, Chabot LE, Sallis JF, Calfas KJ, Res Q Exerc Sport 2000 71 1 36 43 10763519
38. Metabolic equivalent: one size does not fit all. Byrne NM, Hills AP, Hunter GR, Weinsier RL, Schutz Y, J Appl Physiol 2005 99 3 1112 1119 10.1152/japplphysiol.00023.2004 15831804