To dichotomize or not to dichotomize?

European Union Politics

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 334-339

  Marks, Gary ^a,b   Steenbergen, Marco ^c   Hooghe, Liesbet ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868663701     PISSN: 14651165     EISSN: 17412757     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1465116511435823     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Benoit K,Laver MParty Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge; 2006:.
2. De Vries C.EU issue voting: Asset or liability. How European integration affects parties' electoral fortunes.European Union Politics. 2010;11:89-117.
3. Hooghe L,Marks G.Calculation, community, and cues: Public opinion on European integration.European Union Politics. 2005;6:419-443.
4. Marks G,Bakker R,Hooghe L,Steenbergen M.Cross-validating data on party positioning on European integration.Electoral Studies. 2007;26:23-38.
5. Proksch S,Lo J.Reflections on the European integration dimension.European Union Politics. 2012;13 (2): 317-333.
6. Rabinowitz G,Macdonald SE.A directional theory of issue voting.American Political Science Review. 1989;83:93-121.
7. Whitefield S,Vachudova M,Steenbergen M,Rohrschneider R,Marks G,Loveless M,Hooghe L.Do expert surveys produce consistent estimates of party stances on European integration? Comparing expert surveys in the difficult case of Central and Eastern Europe.Electoral Studies. 2007;26:50-61.