Results from the Pilot Project of the Techniker Krankenkasse (TK) Quality Monitoring in Outpatient Psychotherapy: The Evaluators Perspective;Zu den Ergebnissen des Modellprojektes der Techniker-Krankenkasse zum Qualitätsmonitoring in der ambulanten Psychotherapie aus Sicht des wissenschaftlichen Evaluationsteams

PPmP Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie

Volumn 62, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 413-417

  Lutz, Wolfgang ^a   Wittmann, Werner W ^b   Böhnke, Jan R ^a   Rubel, Julian ^a   Steffanowski, Andres ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

feedback; quality assurance; TK project; treatment length

Indexed keywords

FEASIBILITY STUDY; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH INSURANCE; OUTPATIENT CARE; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; TREATMENT DURATION;

AMBULATORY CARE; FEEDBACK; GERMANY; HUMANS; PILOT PROJECTS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84868656268     PISSN: 09372032     EISSN: 14391058     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1327565     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Scheidt C., Brockmann J., Caspar F. et al. Das Modellprojekt der Techniker-Krankenkasse. Eine Kommentierung der Ergebnisse aus der Sicht des wissenschaftlichen Projektbeirates. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol: 2012
2. Lutz W., Böhnke J. R., Köck K. et al. Diagnostik und psychometrische Verlaufsrückmeldungen im Rahmen eines Modellprojektes zur Qualitätssicherung in der ambulanten Psychotherapie. Z Klin Psychol Psychother: 2011; 40 283 297
3. Wittmann W. W., Lutz W., Steffanowski A. et al. Qualitätsmonitoring in der ambulanten Psychotherapie: Abschlussbericht. Hamburg Techniker Krankenkasse: 2011
4. Hiller W., Zaudig M., Mombour W. IDCL - International Diagnostic Checklists for ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Bern Huber: 2004
5. Lutz W. Editorial - Strengthening Psychotherapy Outcome: Neue Ansätze in Qualitätsicherung, Evaluation und Versorgungsforschung. Z Klin Psychol Psychother: 2011; 40 221 223
6. Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. Using multivariate statistics. Boston Pearson Education: 2009
7. Lambert M. J., Whipple J. L., Vermeersch D. A. et al. Enhancing psychotherapy outcomes via providing feedback on client progress: a replication. Clin Psychol Psychother: 2002; 9 91 103 (Pubitemid 40309230)
8. Lambert M. J., Whipple J. L., Smart D. et al. The Effects of Providing Therapists With Feedback on Patient Progress During Psychotherapy: Are Outcomes Enhanced? Psychother Res. 2001; 11 49 68
9. Whipple J. L., Lambert M. J., Vermeersch D. A. et al. Improving the effects of psychotherapy: The use of early identification of treatment and problem-solving strategies in routine practice. J Couns Psychol: 2003; 50 59 68 (Pubitemid 36138830)
10. Carlier IV E., Meuldijk D., Van Vliet I. M. et al. Routine outcome monitoring and feedback on physical or mental health status: evidence and theory. J Eval Clin Pract: 2012; 18 104 110
11. Knaup C., Koesters M., Schoefer D. et al. Effect of feedback of treatment outcome in specialist mental healthcare: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry: 2009; 195 15 22
12. Lambert M. J., Shimokawa K. Collecting client feedback. Psychotherapy: 2011; 48 72 79
13. Shimokawa K., Lambert M. J., Smart D. W. Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. J Consult Clin Psychol: 2010; 78 298 311
14. Hanson W. E., Poston J. M. Building confidence in psychological assessment as a therapeutic intervention: An empirically based reply to Lilienfeld, Garb, and Wood (2011). Psychol Assess: 2011; 23 1056 1062
15. Lilienfeld S. O., Garb H. N., Wood J. M. Unsolved questions concerning the effectiveness of psychological assessment as a therapeutic intervention: Comment on Poston and Hanson (2010). Psychol Assess: 2011; 23 1047 1055
16. Valderas J., Kotzeva A., Espallargues M. et al. The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res: 2008; 17 179 193
17. Bickman L., Kelley S. D., Breda C. et al. Effects of Routine Feedback to Clinicians on Mental Health Outcomes of Youths: Results of a Randomized Trial. Psychiatr Serv: 2011; 62 1423 1429
18. Simon W., Lambert M. J., Harris M. W. et al. Providing patient progress information and clinical support tools to therapists: Effects on patients at risk of treatment failure. Psychother Res: 2012; Epub ahead of print: 1-10
19. De Jong K., van Sluis P., Nugter M. A. et al. Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychother Res: 2012; 22 464 474
20. Lutz W. Patienten in der ambulanten Psychotherapie - Belastungsschwere und Behandlungsintensitäten. Symposium der Bundespsychotherapeutenkammer zur Wirksamkeit der Psychotherapie, Berlin: 2011