Development of a new technique for pedicle screw and magerl screw insertion using a 3-dimensional image guide

Spine

Volumn 37, Issue 23, 2012, Pages 1983-1988

  Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu ^a   Nakano, Masato ^a   Yasuda, Taketoshi ^a   Seki, Shoji ^a   Hori, Takeshi ^a   Kimura, Tomoatsu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOYAMA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Cervical spine; Computed tomography; Computer navigation system; Guide; Magerl screw insertion; Pedicle screw insertion; Surgical technique

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; CERVICAL PEDICLE SCREW INSERTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DRILL; FEMALE; GUIDE WIRE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; KYPHOSCOLIOSIS; MAGERL SCREW INSERTION; MALE; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THICKNESS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BONE SCREWS; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84868647226     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825ab547     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Curylo L, An HS. Spinal instrumentation in degenerative disorders of the cervical spine. In: Clark CR, ed. The Cervical Spine Research Society Editorial Committee: The Cervical Spine. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005: 1115-27.
2. Abumi K, Itoh H, Taneichi H, et al. Transpedicular screw fi xation for traumatic lesions of the middle and lower cervical spine: description of the techniques and preliminary report. J Spinal Disord 1994 ; 7: 19-28.
3. Abumi K, Kaneda K, Shono Y, et al. One-stage posterior decompression and reconstruction of the cervical spine by using pedicle screw fi xation systems. J Neurosurg 1999 ; 90: 19-26.
4. Abumi K, Kaneda K. Pedicle screw fi xation for nontraumatic lesions of the cervical spine. Spine 1997 ; 22: 1853-63.
5. Abumi K, Shono Y, Taneichi H, et al. Correction of cervical kyphosis using pedicle screw fi xation systems. Spine 1999 ; 24: 2389-96.
6. Sakamoto T, Neo M, Nakamura T. Transpedicular screw placement evaluated by axial computed tomography of the cervical pedicle. Spine 2004 ; 29: 2510-4.
7. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Yoshihara H, et al. Cervical pedicle screw fi xation in 100 cases of unstable cervical injuries: pedicle axis views obtained using fl uoroscopy. J Neurosurg Spine 2006 ; 5: 488-93.
8. Johnston TL, Karaikovic EE, Lautenschlager EP, et al. Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths. Spine J 2006 ; 6: 667-72.
9. Jones EL, Heller JG, Silcox DH, et al. Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison. Spine 1997 ; 22: 977-82.
10. Kotani Y, Cunningham BW, Abumi K, et al. Biomechanical analysis of cervical stabilization systems. An assessment of transpedicular screw fi xation in the cervical spine. Spine 1994 ; 19: 2529-39.
11. Kothe R, Rüther W, Schneider E, et al. Biomechanical analysis of transpedicular screw fi xation in the subaxial cervical spine. Spine 2004 ; 29: 1869-75.
12. Papagelopoulos PJ, Currier BL, Neale PG, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of posterior screw fi xation in cadaveric cervical spines. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003 ; 411: 13-24.
13. Rhee JM, Kraiwattanapong C, Hutton WC. A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study. Spine 2005 ; 30: E636-40.
14. Neo M, Fujibayashi S, Miyata M, et al. Vertebral artery injury during cervical spine surgery: a survey of more than 5600 operations. Spine 2008 ; 33: 779-85.
15. Neo M, Sakamoto T, Fujibayashi S, et al. The clinical risk of vertebral artery injury from cervical pedicle screws inserted in degenerative vertebrae. Spine 2005 ; 30: 2800-5.
16. Kast E, Mohr K, Richter HP, et al. Complications of transpedicular screw fi xation in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 2006 ; 15: 327-34.
17. Daentzer D, Deinsberger W, Böker DK. Vertebral artery complications in anterior approaches to the cervical spine: report of two cases and review of literature. Surg Neurol 2003 ; 59: 300-9.
18. Onishi E, Sekimoto Y, Fukumitsu R, et al. Cerebral infarction due to an embolism after cervical pedicle screw fi xation. Spine 2010 ; 35: E63-6.
19. Coric D, Branch CL Jr, Wilson JA, et al. Arteriovenous fi stula as a complication of C1-2 transarticular screw fi xation. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 1996 ; 85: 340-3.
20. Madawi AA, Casey AT, Solanki GA, et al. Radiological and anatomical evaluation of the atlantoaxial transarticular screw fi xation technique. J Neurosurg 1997 ; 86: 961-8.
21. Wright NM, Lauryssen C. Vertebral artery injury in C1-2 transarticular screw fi xation: results of a survey of the AANS/CNS section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves. American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons. J Neurosurg 1998 ; 88: 634-40.
22. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, et al. Placement and complications of cervical pedicle screws in 144 cervical trauma patients using pedicle axis view techniques by fl uoroscope. Eur Spine J 2009 ; 18: 1293-9.
23. Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M, et al. Improved accuracy of computerassisted cervical pedicle screw insertion. J Neurosurg 2003 ; 99: 257-63.
24. Richter M, Amiot LP, Neller S, et al. Computer-assisted surgery in posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine: an in-vitro feasibility study. Eur Spine J 2000; 9: S65-70.
25. Richter M, Cakir B, Schmidt R. Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws. Spine 2005 ; 30: 2280-7.
26. Weidner A, Wähler M, Chiu ST, et al. Modifi cation of C1-C2 transarticular screw fi xation by image-guided surgery. Spine 2000 ; 25: 2668-73.
27. Yoshimoto H, Sato S, Hyakumachi T, et al. Clinical accuracy of cervical pedicle screw insertion using lateral fl uoroscopy: a radiographic analysis of the learning curve. Eur Spine J 2009 ; 18: 1326-34.
28. Miyamoto H, Uno K. Cervical pedicle screw insertion using a computed tomography cutout technique. J Neurosurg Spine 2009 ; 11: 681-7.
29. Abumi K, Shono Y, Ito M, et al. Complications of pedicle screw fi xation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine. Spine 2000 ; 25: 962-9.
30. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Laville C, et al. Treatment of lower cervical spine injuries - C3 to C7. Spine 1992 ; 17: S442-6.
31. Klein S, Whyne CM, Rush R, et al. CT-based patient-specifi c simulation software for pedicle screw insertion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009 ; 22: 502-6.
32. Yamazaki M, Akazawa T, Koda M, et al. Surgical simulation of instrumented posterior occipitocervical fusion in a child with congenital skeletal anomaly: case report. Spine 2006 ; 31: E590-4.
33. Yamazaki M, Akazawa T, Okawa A, et al. Usefulness of threedimensional full-scale modeling of surgery for a giant cell tumor of the cervical spine. Spinal Cord 2007 ; 45: 250-3.
34. Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Akazawa T, et al. Usefulness of 3-dimensional full-scale modeling for preoperative simulation of surgery in a patient with old unilateral cervical fracture-dislocation. Spine 2007 ; 32: E532-6.
35. Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Fujiyoshi T, et al. Simulated surgery for a patient with neurofi bromatosis type-1 who had severe cervicothoracic kyphoscoliosis and an anomalous vertebral artery. Spine 2010 ; 35: E368-73.
36. Ryken RC, Kim J, Owen BD, et al. Engineering patients-specifi c drill templates and bioabsorbable posterior cervical plates: a feasibility study. J Neurosurg Spine 2009 ; 10: 129-32.