Early adverse results with bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort comparison to total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2011, Pages 35-39

  Morrison, Todd A ^a   Nyce, Jonathan D ^a   Macaulay, William B ^a   Geller, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a NewYork Presbyterian at Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Osteoarthritis; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOINT STIFFNESS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PAIN; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 12; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX;

EID: 84868610076     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.041     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Saccomanni B. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review of literature. Clin Rheumatol 2010;29:339.
2. Hopper G, Leach W. Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement: total versus unicompartmental. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008;16: 973.
3. Stern SH, Becker MW, Insall JN. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An evaluation of selection criteria. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;143.
4. Miller R, Kettelkamp DB, Laubenthal KN, et al. Quantitative correlations in degenerative arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973;55:956.
5. Temple MM, Bae WC, Chen MQ, et al. Age- and siteassociated biomechanical weakening of human articular cartilage of the femoral condyle. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007;15:1042.
6. Lawrence R, Felson D, Helmick C, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States: part II. Arthritis Rheum 2007;58:26.
7. Rolston L, Bresch J, Engh G, et al. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a bone-sparing, ligament-sparing, and minimally invasive alternative for active patients. Orthopedics 2007;30:70.
8. Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, et al. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;151.
9. Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:862.
10. Patil S, Colwell CW, Ezzet KA, et al. Can normal knee kinematics be restored with unicompartmental knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:332.
11. Rolston L, Siewert K. Assessment of knee alignment after bicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24:1111.
12. Wang H, Dugan E, Frame J, et al. Gait analysis after bicompartmental knee replacement. Clin Biomech 2009;24: 751.
13. Scuderi GR. The stiff total knee arthroplasty: causality and solution. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:23.
14. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Stiehl JB, et al. Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: the effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:748.
15. Aleto TJ, Berend ME, Ritter MA, et al. Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:159.