Validation of deformable registration in head and neck cancer using analysis of variance

Medical Physics

Volumn 39, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 6879-6884

  Mencarelli, A ^a   Van Beek, S ^a   Van Kranen, S ^a   Rasch, C ^a   Van Herk, M ^a   Sonke, J J ^a  

^a ANTONI VAN LEEUWENHOEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

analysis of variance; deformable registration validation; head and neck cancer; observer variation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DEFORMATION; DISEASES;

ANATOMICAL FEATURES; ANATOMICAL LANDMARKS; DEFORMABLE IMAGE REGISTRATION; DEFORMABLE REGISTRATION; HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER; OBSERVER VARIATIONS; PAIRWISE DISTANCES; REGISTRATION METHODS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA);

EID: 84868596560     PISSN: 00942405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1118/1.4760990     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. B. Schaly, J. A. Kempe, G. S. Bauman, J. J. Battista, and J. Van Dyk, Tracking the dose distribution in radiation therapy by accounting for variable anatomy., Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 791-805 (2004). 10.1088/0031-9155/49/5/010
2. J. Orban de Xivry, Tumour delineation and cumulative dose computation in radiotherapy based on deformable registration of respiratory correlated CT images of lung cancer patients., Radiother. Oncol. 85, 232-238 (2007). 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.08.012
3. W. Lu, G. H. Olivera, Q. Chen, M. L. Chen, and K. J. Ruchala, Automatic re-contouring in 4D radiotherapy., Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 1077-1099 (2006). 10.1088/0031-9155/51/5/002
4. M. Chao, Y. Xie, and L. Xing, Auto-propagation of contours for adaptive prostate radiation therapy., Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 4533-4542 (2008). 10.1088/0031-9155/53/17/005
5. U. Malsch, C. Thieke, P. E. Huber, and R. Bendl, An enhanced block matching algorithm for fast elastic registration in adaptive radiotherapy., Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 4789-4806 (2006). 10.1088/0031-9155/51/19/005
6. D. Sarrut, V. Boldea, S. Miguet, and C. Ginestet, Simulation of four-dimensional CT images from deformable registration between inhale and exhale breath-hold CT scans., Med. Phys. 33, 605-617 (2006). 10.1118/1.2161409
7. R. Kashani, M. Hub, M. L. Kessler, and J. M. Balter, A physical phantom for assessment of accuracy of deformable alignment algorithms., Med. Phys. 34 2785-2788 (2007). 10.1118/1.2739812
8. K. O. Noe, B. D. de Senneville, U. V. Elstrom, K. Tanderup, and T. S. Sorensen, Acceleration and validation of optical flow based deformable registration for image-guided radiotherapy., Acta Oncol. 47, 1286-1293 (2008). 10.1080/02841860802258760
9. M. Serban, E. Heath, G. Stroian, D. L. Collins, and J. Seuntjens, A deformable phantom for 4D radiotherapy verification: Design and image registration evaluation., Med. Phys. 35, 1094-2002 (2008). 10.1118/1.2836417
10. S. Nithiananthan, K. K. Brock, M. J. Daly, H. Chan, J. C. Irish, and J. H. Siewerdsen, Demons deformable registration for CBCT-guided procedures in the head and neck: Convergence and accuracy., Med. Phys. 36, 4755-4764 (2009). 10.1118/1.3223631
11. R. Castillo, A framework for evaluation of deformable image registration spatial accuracy using large landmark point sets., Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 1849-1870 (2009). 10.1088/0031-9155/54/7/001
12. K. K. Brock, Results of a multi-institution deformable registration accuracy study (MIDRAS)., Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 76, 583-596 (2010). 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.031
13. K. G. Gilhuijs, A. Touw, M. van Herk, and R. E. Vijlbrief, Optimization of automatic portal image analysis., Med. Phys. 22, 1089-1099 (1995). 10.1118/1.597610
14. S. van Kranen, S. van Beek, C. Rasch, M. van Herk, and J.-J. Sonke, Setup uncertainties of anatomical sub-regions in head-And-neck cancer patients after offline CBCT guidance., Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 73, 1566-1573 (2009). 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.035
15. M. van Herk and H. M. Kooy, Automatic three-dimensional correlation of CT-CT, CTMRI, and CT-SPECT using chamfer matching., Med. Phys. 21, 1163-1178 (1994). 10.1118/1.597344
16. F. L. Bookstein, Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations., IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11, 567-585 (1989). 10.1109/34.24792
17. G. E. Christensen and H. J. Johnson, Consistent image registration., IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20, 568-582 (2001). 10.1109/42.932742
18. P. Castadot, J. A. Lee, A. Parraga, X. Geets, B. Macq, and V. Grègoire, Comparison of 12 deformable registration strategies in adaptive radiation therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors., Radiother. Oncol. 89, 1-12 (2008). 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.04.010
19. K. I. Penny, Appropriate critical values when testing for a single multivariate outlier by using the Mahalanobis distance., J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. C, Appl. Stat. 45 (1), 73-81 (1996). 10.2307/2986224
20. S. Klein, M. Staring, and J. P. W. Pluim, Comparison of gradient approximation techniques for optimisation of mutual information in nonrigid registration., Proc. SPIE 5747, 192-203 (2005). 10.1117/12.595277
21. H. Wang, L. Dong, J. O'Daniel, R. Mohan, A. S. Garden, K. K. Ang, D. A. Kuban, M. Bonnen, J. Y. Chang, and R. Cheung, Validation of an accelerated demons' algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy., Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 2887-2905 (2005). 10.1088/0031-9155/50/12/011
22. H. Zhong, J. Kim, and I. J. Chetty, Analysis of deformable image registration accuracy using computational modeling., Med. Phys. 37, 970-979 (2010). 10.1118/1.3302141